You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Claude prioritizes speed over user-defined workflow sequencing even when explicitly instructed not to #44027
When users define strict sequential workflows (e.g., "run step A, wait for result, then step B"), Claude frequently parallelizes steps or starts downstream work before upstream steps complete — even when the workflow document and conversation both explicitly say "strict sequencing" and "quality over speed."
Observed Behavior
Parallelizes sequential gates: When a workflow defines steps that must run in order (e.g., code review → security review → deploy), Claude runs them all in parallel to appear faster. If an earlier step rejects, the downstream work is wasted.
Starts downstream work before upstream completes: Claude spawns deployment agents before review agents have reported back. If review finds issues, the deployment was wasted time and tokens.
Acknowledges the mistake but repeats it: When called out, Claude says "you're right, won't happen again" but continues optimizing for speed in the same session. The correction doesn't stick within the conversation.
"Automode" is misinterpreted as "skip steps": Users define automode to mean "no approval prompts needed." Claude interprets it as license to reorder, parallelize, or skip workflow steps.
Expected Behavior
When a user defines a sequential workflow, follow it exactly as written
Do not start step N+1 until step N has completed and passed
If a step fails, do not let already-spawned downstream agents continue burning tokens — kill them immediately
"Automode" should mean "proceed without asking for permission" not "proceed without following the process"
Impact
Wasted API tokens on work that gets thrown away (deploying code that hasn't passed review)
User has to repeatedly correct the same behavior in the same session
Undermines trust in Claude following user-defined processes
Reproduction
Define a sequential multi-step workflow in CLAUDE.md or a project file
Ask Claude to execute it in "automode"
Observe that Claude parallelizes steps that should be sequential
Reject at an early step and observe that downstream agents keep running
This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.
Activity
github-actions commentedon Apr 6, 2026
Found 3 possible duplicate issues:
This issue will be automatically closed as a duplicate in 3 days.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
github-actions commentedon Apr 9, 2026
This issue has been automatically closed as a duplicate of #29852.
If this is incorrect, please re-open this issue or create a new one.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
github-actions commentedon Apr 16, 2026
This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.