hi @CarlosPoses,
When applying the masking function, something like this can happen:
Because we mask the largest number, we know that the masked count at dat_hist$gestweek == 27 can only be 13 or higher. The current result is not 'wrong' but basically already ruling out some numbers.
We currently anyway embrace that potential numbers within a masked range may not have equal probability to be the true number. So shall we trim the range to the 'real' potential range? Thus, in case of the above example, the result should show [13-21].
hi @CarlosPoses,
When applying the masking function, something like this can happen:
Because we mask the largest number, we know that the masked count at
dat_hist$gestweek == 27can only be 13 or higher. The current result is not 'wrong' but basically already ruling out some numbers.We currently anyway embrace that potential numbers within a masked range may not have equal probability to be the true number. So shall we trim the range to the 'real' potential range? Thus, in case of the above example, the result should show
[13-21].