Skip to content

Add logo header to README + single-glyph icon font - #3

Merged
HarryCordewener merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/logo-readme
Jul 28, 2026
Merged

Add logo header to README + single-glyph icon font#3
HarryCordewener merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/logo-readme

Conversation

@HarryCordewener

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Small, self-contained branch off main for the logo/README items (separate from the M5 feature PR).

Changes

  • README — center the MuGlyph mark (docs/logo.svg) above the title.
  • Icon fontassets/fonts/MuGlyph.ttf, a single-glyph TrueType font carrying the mark at U+E000 (Private Use Area), so users can merge it into their terminal font / Nerd-Font patch and show the logo in the TUI header as a normal character.
  • Generatortools/make-glyph-font.py builds the font from the SVG (scales the 512-unit viewBox to a 1000-unit em and flips the Y axis), plus assets/fonts/README.md documenting regeneration.

Notes

Terminals render text in the user's configured font, so the app can't ship its own glyph — the font is an opt-in for users who want the mark in their terminal; the header falls back to a text label otherwise.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code


Generated by Claude Code

Center the MuGlyph mark (docs/logo.svg) above the title in the README,
and add a generator that bakes the mark into a single-glyph TrueType
font (assets/fonts/MuGlyph.ttf at U+E000) for users who want the logo
to appear in their terminal.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015w2WJ5M22CZmg9md67zpeB
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@HarryCordewener, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 11 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: a1160810-cf9e-4e09-b100-598e9ea76e0a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 86adede and e7bc987.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • assets/fonts/MuGlyph.ttf is excluded by !**/*.ttf
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • README.md
  • assets/fonts/README.md
  • tools/make-glyph-font.py
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch claude/logo-readme

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@HarryCordewener
HarryCordewener merged commit 3819826 into main Jul 28, 2026
3 checks passed
@HarryCordewener
HarryCordewener deleted the claude/logo-readme branch July 28, 2026 01:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants