Skip to content

[Improve] Show a bullet mask for preconfigured setup secret fields - #39

Merged
mrubens merged 1 commit into
developfrom
improve/mask-preconfigured-inference-keys-1zelyqtejh7uc
Jul 9, 2026
Merged

[Improve] Show a bullet mask for preconfigured setup secret fields#39
mrubens merged 1 commit into
developfrom
improve/mask-preconfigured-inference-keys-1zelyqtejh7uc

Conversation

@roomote-roomote-v1

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Opened on behalf of Matt Rubens. Follow up by mentioning @openmote, in the web UI, or in Slack.

What changed

When a setup secret is already satisfied by a runtime ENV var (or a saved credential in the usual mask path), the field now shows the standard bullet mask (••••••••…) instead of an empty input next to the checkmark. Applied on Configure inference, plus the same runtime-secret gap on compute and source-control setup secret fields.

Why this change was made

A prepopulated inference key only showed a checkmark while the input looked blank, so it was unclear that a key was already configured. Masking matches the established settings pattern and makes the pre-filled state obvious without revealing the secret.

Impact

On setup steps with a configured secret, users see a filled masked field rather than an empty box. Empty still only means "no value yet." Focus-to-edit for saved keys is unchanged.

When a runtime ENV or saved secret already satisfies a setup field, render the standard bullet mask so the field is visibly configured instead of looking empty.
@roomote-roomote-v1

roomote-roomote-v1 Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

No code issues found. See task

@mrubens
mrubens marked this pull request as ready for review July 9, 2026 16:01
@mrubens
mrubens merged commit bbed642 into develop Jul 9, 2026
@mrubens
mrubens deleted the improve/mask-preconfigured-inference-keys-1zelyqtejh7uc branch July 9, 2026 16:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant