Skip to content

fix(experiments): repair dead qualitative-feedback links in experiment skills #91281

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
trunk-io merged 2 commits into from
Sep 1, 2026
Merged

fix(experiments): repair dead qualitative-feedback links in experiment skills #91281

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
62fc6b5
fix(experiments): repair dead qualitative-feedback link in replay skill
posthog[bot] Aug 29, 2026
3cc5827
fix(experiments): repair the same dead qualitative-feedback link in t…
mp-hog Sep 1, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion products/experiments/skills/analyzing-experiment-session-replays/SKILL.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ worth checking with the people who produced it. Once per conversation at most; d
Default to asking every exposed user rather than one variant: a popover shown to only one arm is itself a
difference between the arms, and the response event carries the variant anyway, so the split survives.

→ See `references/qualitative-feedback.md` in [[diagnosing-experiment-results]]
→ See [`references/qualitative-feedback.md`](../diagnosing-experiment-results/references/qualitative-feedback.md) in [[diagnosing-experiment-results]]

## Example interaction

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion products/experiments/skills/managing-experiment-lifecycle/SKILL.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ One optional item worth a single mention at launch, when the change is user-faci
short survey, shown when users finish the experimented flow (e.g. triggered by the form's submit event),
collects qualitative feedback (a rating, an optional comment) alongside the metrics, from day one. Offer it once as setup advice, drop it if declined, and
never let it delay the launch. Do **not** raise it at end or ship-variant time — there it reads as a gate
on rolling out. → See `references/qualitative-feedback.md` in [[diagnosing-experiment-results]]
on rolling out. → See [`references/qualitative-feedback.md`](../diagnosing-experiment-results/references/qualitative-feedback.md) in [[diagnosing-experiment-results]]

### Pause (`experiment-pause`)

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion products/experiments/skills/scanning-experiments-with-replay-vision/SKILL.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -229,4 +229,4 @@ The check that does settle it is asking the people. A short survey, triggered wh

Two constraints carry over from this skill and matter as much here. Don't name the variant in the survey question, for the same reason the scanner prompt doesn't: the answer stops being evidence about the surface. And prefer asking everyone who completes the flow over targeting one variant, because a popover shown to one variant is a difference between the variants that the experiment is still measuring.

→ See `references/qualitative-feedback.md` in [[diagnosing-experiment-results]]
→ See [`references/qualitative-feedback.md`](../diagnosing-experiment-results/references/qualitative-feedback.md) in [[diagnosing-experiment-results]]
Loading