You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Colmap and Mast3r pose scales are inconsistent #83
I have a question, theoretically speaking, the pose scales of colmap and mast3R are not consistent because dust3R cannot estimate a point cloud of the same scale as colmap. Therefore, you used colmap's pose for optimization during testing. Is this correct, or was there something I thought wrong? Please correct me. Thank you
For the scale inconsistency between COLMAP and learned SfM (MASt3R/VGGT) — I built a pipeline that handles this via Sim(3) alignment across chunks with confidence weighting. Also exports directly to COLMAP format with consistent scale:
Activity
jashshah999 commentedon May 6, 2026
For the scale inconsistency between COLMAP and learned SfM (MASt3R/VGGT) — I built a pipeline that handles this via Sim(3) alignment across chunks with confidence weighting. Also exports directly to COLMAP format with consistent scale:
Factor graph (iSAM2 + DINOv2 loop closure) ensures global scale consistency across chunks. Works on 8GB+ GPUs.
https://github.com/jashshah999/vggt-factor-refinement
jashshah999 commentedon May 8, 2026
recon3d handles scale consistency via Sim(3) chunk alignment + factor graph. Outputs COLMAP format directly:
Works on 8GB+ GPUs, 250k Gaussians in ~5 min.