The bits related to the style transfer experiments are unclear to me. The prosodic control is now represented by the latent space instead of the GST compared to Mellotron/Tacotron 2, but I'm missing how you can project an utterance to the latent space, i.e Section 4.4, especially Section 4.4.4 in the paper.
My guess is the following, and please confirm if that's right:
- getting z from style utterance ("prior evidence") you do flowtron.forward( mel, speaker_vecs, text, in_lens, out_lens). You do this with the style utterance's transcription. What's the correct way to assign speaker vecs then, if it is an unseen speaker?
- running flowtron.inference() using that z (residual) from the code.
I tried using the style speaker's id and I found that the style is very nicely represented but the spoken text is gibberish.
I put the style example (angry.wav) and the synthesised example here. The utterance to synth: "How are you today?"
Here is what I changed in inference.py (sorry, my padding solution is criminal):
with torch.no_grad():
if utterance is None:
residual = torch.cuda.FloatTensor(1, 80, n_frames).normal_() * sigma
else:
utt_text = "Dogs are sitting by the door!"
utt_text = trainset.get_text(utt_text).cuda()
utt_text = utt_text[None]
# loading mel spectra, in_lens, out_lens?
audio, _ = load_wav_to_torch(utterance)
mel = trainset.get_mel(audio).to(device="cuda")
# You need to padd this because of the permute
mel = mel[None]
out_lens = torch.LongTensor(1).to(device="cuda")
out_lens[0] = mel.size(2)
in_lens = torch.LongTensor([utt_text.shape[1]]).to(device="cuda")
residual, _, _, _, _, _, _ = model.forward(mel, speaker_vecs, utt_text, in_lens, out_lens)
residual = residual.permute(1,2,0)
# TODO: This is a horrible solution to pad once if needed
if n_frames > residual.shape[2]:
pad_len = n_frames - residual.shape[2]
residual = torch.cat((residual,residual[:,:,:pad_len]),axis=2)
else:
residual = residual[:,:,:n_frames]
mels, attentions = model.infer(residual, speaker_vecs, text)
The bits related to the style transfer experiments are unclear to me. The prosodic control is now represented by the latent space instead of the GST compared to Mellotron/Tacotron 2, but I'm missing how you can project an utterance to the latent space, i.e Section 4.4, especially Section 4.4.4 in the paper.
My guess is the following, and please confirm if that's right:
I tried using the style speaker's id and I found that the style is very nicely represented but the spoken text is gibberish.
I put the style example (angry.wav) and the synthesised example here. The utterance to synth: "How are you today?"
Here is what I changed in inference.py (sorry, my padding solution is criminal):