Repository navigation
feat(engine): graph lineage in __manifest — single-source fold, v3→v4 migration, schema-version floor - #299
Conversation
…ts (§5.1)
3b shipped a minimal WriteTxn{branch,base} and deferred the full §4.1 opener
unification (pinned-base opener, shared Session, write-local handle cache,
strict-op conflict-timing move) to step 5. The greptile comments on the #295
spec were moot for #298 (none of those constructs were built) but are
load-bearing for step 5: (1) the handle cache must be Send+Sync (Mutex, not
RefCell); (2) the strict-op timing move needs an explicit retry contract — txn
discarded after any commit, retry re-opens a fresh base — which is the SAME
contract as the stale-view false-fail (§1d.2); (3) the opener-equivalence test
must advance HEAD externally then assert pinned-base, not the trivial HEAD==base.
…-013 Phase 7)
Graph lineage no longer lives in a second write to _graph_commits.lance. Each
commit's graph_commit + graph_head:<branch> rows now ride the SAME __manifest
merge-insert as the table-version rows (one atomic version), and CommitGraph reads
its cache from the manifest projection (read_graph_lineage). _graph_commits.lance is
no longer written commit rows (it remains only as a Lance branch-ref carrier).
Mechanism: a LineageIntent { graph_commit_id (ULID, minted once), branch, actor,
merged_parent, created_at } threads through ManifestBatchPublisher::publish. Inside
the publisher retry loop the parent is resolved per attempt from the just-loaded
branch-scoped manifest (the should_replace_head winner over the visible graph_commit
rows — branch-correct by Lance branch isolation; the graph_head row is written for
forward-compat + the §7.1 contention point but is not the parent source, so a
freshly-forked branch resolves the right fork-point parent). A CAS-conflict retry
re-reads the advanced head → correct new parent; the commit_id is stable across
retries.
Closes two known gaps BY CONSTRUCTION (one write, no second step to fail/ race):
- manifest→commit-graph atomicity (no crash window between manifest + lineage),
- commit-graph parent under concurrency (no refresh→append TOCTOU; the per-write
commit_graph.refresh() is gone).
Recovery, branch-merge, and genesis route their lineage through the same CAS
(merge: one commit_merge_with_actor; recovery: publish_recovery_commit folds the
recovery commit, actor=omnigraph:recovery; genesis rides the init __manifest write).
The dead _graph_commits write helpers (append_commit/_merge/_actor) are
#[allow(dead_code)] (the actor sidecar table is still enumerated by optimize).
Verified (sequential): build clean; the new lineage_projection gate (manifest-only —
_graph_commits/_actors have 0 rows; full lineage reconstructs via the projection);
branching/merge_truth_table (exhaustive, branch-aware)/composite_flow/point_in_time/
changes/consistency/recovery; failpoints (59, incl. recovery lifecycle + the
now-closed atomicity gap); full --workspace. Cost tests REVERT to their pre-fold
values (writes +1, write_cost ceiling 80) — the proof of true single-CAS (no extra
write). invariants.md marks both gaps CLOSED.
PENDING (next stages, this PR): the §7.1 concurrent graph_head one-winner gate (stage
5 — two concurrent same-branch commits, exactly one wins); the stamp bump v4 +
migrate_v3_to_v4 backfill + read-only refuse for EXISTING graphs (stage 4); full
doc-sync of storage.md/architecture.md/writes.md.
… Phase 7 stage 4) The Phase-7 fold made CommitGraph read lineage from the __manifest projection, so a pre-Phase-7 (internal-schema v3) graph — lineage in _graph_commits.lance, none in __manifest — would read an empty commit DAG. Stage 4 makes existing graphs upgrade seamlessly and not break reads. - Stamp 3 -> 4 + migrate_v3_to_v4: bumps INTERNAL_MANIFEST_SCHEMA_VERSION and adds the 3 => migrate_v3_to_v4 arm. The migration reads this branch's _graph_commits/_actors, emits one graph_commit row per commit + exactly one graph_head:<branch> for the head (should_replace_head winner, deterministic id-sort — no hash-map-order in migration output), merge-inserts into __manifest, then set_stamp(4) LAST. Idempotency guard first (read_graph_lineage non-empty -> just stamp); crash before set_stamp re-enters at v3 and the guard completes it. Does NOT touch the unenforced-PK metadata. Runs per branch: migrate_on_open backfills main; load_publish_state backfills each branch on its first write (root_uri/branch threaded through migrate_internal_schema). - v3-read fallback: CommitGraph version-gates the lineage source — stamp < 4 reads the (re-activated) _graph_commits.lance; >= 4 uses the manifest projection. So a READ-ONLY open of an un-migrated graph reads correct history with no write. Correctness catch: the legacy _graph_commit_actors.lance was never branched, so the fallback reads it FLAT (no branch checkout) while checking out the branch only on the commits dataset. - Read-only stamp-refuse: a ReadOnly open of a FUTURE-stamped graph now refuses with the same upgrade error (future-proofing the next format bump; the write path already refused via migrate_internal_schema). - Docs: storage/architecture/writes/invariants/constants updated to manifest-stored lineage; release note docs/releases/v0.8.0.md (format v4, old writers clean-break, data preserved, upgrade writers first). 6 new tests (v3 backfill, idempotent, v3 read-only fallback, future-stamp refuse in both modes, crash-before-stamp completes, legacy branch+flat-actor read). Full engine suite + failpoints (59) + cargo test --workspace --locked green; check-agents-md passes.
…ers form a linear commit DAG (RFC-013 Phase 7) Two (or N) writers committing disjoint tables on one branch still share the mutable `graph_head:<branch>` manifest row, so the only row-level CAS contention is that row. The contract — exactly one writer wins each CAS round; the loser retries inside the publisher, re-resolves its parent off the freshly-advanced head, and re-commits, so every writer lands and the graph_commit DAG stays a single LINEAR chain (no fork) — had no acceptance test. This adds it. - concurrent_disjoint_writes_share_head_and_form_linear_chain: two disjoint writers + distinct LineageIntent, tokio::join!; both commit; the on-disk DAG is genesis -> c -> c' (asserted linear: exactly one genesis, no two commits share a parent, the head is the unique non-parent). - n_concurrent_disjoint_writers_converge_to_one_linear_chain: N=8 disjoint writers each with an app-level retry loop (the publisher's internal budget can be exhausted under contention); all converge to one linear chain of 8. - concurrent_disjoint_writes_form_linear_chain_on_s3: the same race on a real object store (true conditional-put CAS), bucket-gated. Cites both tests from the §7.1 contention note in invariants.md. Test-only; no production change.
…ngle __manifest scan (RFC-013 P2) Each lineage publish scanned `__manifest` twice: `load_publish_state` read table state via one scan, then `resolve_lineage_rows` did a second full `read_graph_lineage` scan only to find the parent commit. Fold the `graph_commit` extraction into the existing scan. - `read_manifest_scan` gains a `collect_lineage` flag. The publish path (`read_publish_scan`) collects the `graph_commit` rows in the same pass; the table-state hot path leaves them in the forward-compat skip arm, so it never pays the O(commits) lineage JSON decode (it also skips reading the `object_id` column entirely). One shared `decode_graph_commit_row` serves both the folded path and the standalone `read_graph_lineage`, so the two cannot drift. - `resolve_lineage_rows` is now sync and takes the already-parsed rows; the per-attempt re-read is preserved because `load_publish_state` runs once per CAS attempt, so a retry still re-parents off the advanced head. - `load_publish_state` returns a named `LoadedPublishState` instead of a four-tuple; the thin `read_registered_table_locations` / `read_tombstone_versions` accessors fold away. `read_manifest_entries` becomes `#[cfg(test)]`: the fold removes its last production caller, leaving only the test-only namespace module (`db/manifest.rs`: `#[cfg(test)] mod namespace`), so gating it keeps it from becoming dead code in non-test builds. Measured at depth ~5: per-write `__manifest` reads drop 44 -> 26 (total reads 54 -> 36). write_cost.rs gains a `manifest_reads <= 34` sub-ceiling that trips if a publish-path scan is re-added, and its calibration comment is corrected.
…the v3→v4 migration A pre-Phase-7 (internal schema v3) graph keeps its graph lineage in `_graph_commits.lance`; the v3→v4 internal-schema migration backfills it into `__manifest` and stamps v4. `read_legacy_commit_cache` currently maps EVERY `Dataset::open` error to "no legacy data" (`Err(_) => empty`), so a transient or corrupt open during the one-time migration backfills nothing and still stamps v4 — orphaning the real lineage permanently (the migration runs once; the v3 fallback is then disabled). Add a `migration.v3_to_v4.legacy_open` failpoint that injects a non-not-found Lance error at the legacy open, and a fault-injection regression test in the `failpoints` binary. Against the current swallow the migration completes anyway, so the test fails on its "migration must abort" assertion — the predicted symptom. The fix follows in the next commit. Test support reachable from the `failpoints` integration binary (it compiles the crate without `cfg(test)`): the v3-fixture helpers and a stamp/row-count reader are gated `cfg(any(test, feature = "failpoints"))`, still excluded from release builds. Failpoint tests stay in the integration binary because the fail registry is process-global.
…migration `read_legacy_commit_cache` mapped EVERY `Dataset::open` error to an empty cache (`Err(_) => empty`) on both the legacy commits dataset and its actor sidecar. The v3→v4 internal-schema migration reads this once before stamping internal-schema v4; a transient or corrupt open therefore backfilled nothing and stamped v4 anyway, orphaning the graph's real lineage permanently (the migration runs once, and the stamp-gated v3 fallback is disabled at v4). This is the "no silent failures" deny-list violation, and realistic on object storage. Both opens now match the not-found variants — Lance maps an object-store NotFound to `DatasetNotFound` — as the benign "no legacy data" / "no authors" signal, and propagate anything else as a loud error. The two arms share the variant contract but carry different rationale (commits-absent is the legitimate empty signal; actor-sidecar-absent is benign, but a corrupt actor open silently wiping authorship before stamping v4 is the same loss hole), commented at each site. Pinned by the `lance_surface_guards.rs::dataset_open_missing_returns_not_found_variant` guard (turns red if a Lance bump changes the absence variant) and greens the fault-injection regression test from the previous commit.
…ce branch `seed_legacy_v3_lineage` writes every commit (including the "feature"-tagged one) to MAIN's `_graph_commits.lance` with `manifest_branch` as a mere field, so the production per-branch migration path — `read_legacy_commit_cache` checking out a real Lance branch, and a branch-scoped `__manifest` — was never exercised. Add `seed_legacy_v3_lineage_with_branch`, which forks a real `feature` Lance branch on BOTH `_graph_commits.lance` and `__manifest` (the branch inherits main's stripped v3 state), and a test that migrates the BRANCH and asserts the branch's lineage lands in the BRANCH's `__manifest` (genesis + A + branch commit, `graph_head:feature` → branch commit, parents + actors intact) with main's `__manifest` untouched. This empirically resolves the open question behind the merge robustness work: the fast-path `read_graph_lineage(dataset)` has no `manifest_branch` filter, but `__manifest` is Lance-branched per graph-branch, so a branch reads only its own lineage — the test confirms migrating one branch does not leak into another. No branch filter is needed.
…blisher classifier
`state::merge_lineage_rows` (the v3→v4 lineage backfill's standalone `__manifest`
merge-insert) stringified its `execute_reader` error, discarding the Lance
variant. Route it through the publisher's `map_lance_publish_error` (now
`pub(crate)`) so a concurrent first-open's row-level CAS loss surfaces as the
SAME typed `OmniError::Manifest{ details: RowLevelCasContention }` the publisher's
own retry consumes — one vocabulary, no raw-Lance matching in the migration.
Deliberately NOT unified with `optimize::is_retryable_lance_conflict`: that
classifier also matches `CommitConflict`/`RetryableCommitConflict` from the
compaction commit path, which a row-level merge-insert never emits. Cross-linked
with a comment at both sites.
Behavior-preserving: the only path that changes is the error TYPE on a CAS loss
(previously an opaque `Lance` string, now a typed conflict); no success/failure
outcome changes. The bounded re-open retry that consumes the new type lands next.
…erging
`migrate_v2_to_v3` is concurrent-runner idempotent by design; v3→v4 regressed it.
`merge_lineage_rows` uses `conflict_retries(0)` and `migrate_v3_to_v4` has no
app-level retry, so when two processes open the same legacy graph at once the
backfill's row-level CAS loser errors the whole open instead of converging.
The test opens two `__manifest` handles at the same pre-migration (v3,
empty-lineage) HEAD and runs both `migrate_internal_schema` calls under
`tokio::join!`, forcing the `graph_head:main` CAS to fire every run. Against the
current code the loser fails with `RowLevelCasContention` ("Attempted 0
retries.") — the predicted symptom — so the "both must converge" assertion
panics. The bounded re-open retry that makes both converge lands next.
…t runners `migrate_v2_to_v3` is concurrent-runner idempotent; v3→v4 was not. Two processes (or open-for-write handles) opening the same legacy graph at once both reach the backfill merge, and `merge_lineage_rows`'s `conflict_retries(0)` made the row-level CAS loser error the whole open instead of converging. Two contention points, both now handled all-or-nothing: 1. The backfill merge on `graph_head:<branch>`. Wrap (fast-path re-read → read legacy → merge) in a bounded re-open retry loop: a `RowLevelCasContention` loss re-opens the manifest past the winner's (atomic) commit and re-loops; the fast-path re-read then sees the winner's lineage and stamps. On budget exhaustion it returns a `RowLevelCasContention`-typed error so the publisher's OUTER retry loop completes it. The retry decision reuses the publisher's `is_retryable_publish_conflict` so the two stay in lockstep. 2. The terminal stamp bump. Making the merge loser converge newly lets BOTH runners reach `set_stamp(4)` — an `UpdateConfig` commit on the same key — so the loser gets `lance::Error::IncompatibleTransaction` (NOT a row-level CAS, so the merge loop doesn't catch it). This surfaced only under the concurrent full-suite run, not the isolated test. Both write the SAME value, so the conflict is benign: `commit_v4_stamp_idempotently` re-opens and, if the stamp already reached the target, succeeds; else re-applies (bounded). Greens the race test from the previous commit (3x isolated, 5x full-suite, no flake). The new `IncompatibleTransaction` match is pinned by `lance_surface_guards.rs::lance_error_incompatible_transaction_variant_exists`.
… path `load_commit_cache_for_branch` dispatched on the branch's internal-schema stamp — `< CURRENT` to the v3 legacy fallback, `>= CURRENT` to the manifest projection — but never refused a `> CURRENT` branch stamp, so a newer-binary shape would be misread by the projection rather than rejected. Add `refuse_if_stamp_too_new(stamp)` (re-exported `pub(crate)` from `migrations`) right after the branch stamp is read, mirroring the main read path's `refuse_if_internal_schema_too_new`. This is defense-in-depth, not a live hole: migrations run main-first (main migrates on open; each branch on its first write), so main's stamp is always >= every branch's and the main path refuses first. The guard closes the gap if that ordering invariant is ever weakened. Tested by force-stamping a real branch past CURRENT and asserting the branch read refuses with the upgrade error (the test misreads via the projection — returns Ok — without the guard, confirmed by removing it).
invariants.md Known Gaps: the `migrate_v3_to_v4` entry now states the migration is loud on non-not-found legacy-open errors and concurrent-runner idempotent (bounded re-open retry on the merge CAS + idempotent stamp bump), and that the branch read path refuses a `> CURRENT` stamp. lance.md: note the two new surface guards the migration depends on (`dataset_open_missing_returns_not_found_variant`, `lance_error_incompatible_transaction_variant_exists`). testing.md: note the migration fault-injection test in the failpoints row.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b18818a815
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| None => HashMap::new(), | ||
| }; | ||
| let (commit_by_id, head_commit) = load_commit_cache(&dataset, &actor_by_commit_id).await?; | ||
| let (commit_by_id, head_commit) = load_commit_cache_for_branch(root, Some(branch)).await?; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid gating manifest lineage reads on derived refs
When a live manifest branch exists but its derived _graph_commits.lance branch ref is missing or stale (for example after a failed branch-create rollback or branch-ref reclaim drift), open_at_branch still fails during the earlier _graph_commits checkout before reaching this manifest-backed projection. Since this cache is now sourced from authoritative __manifest lineage, keeping the empty commit-graph branch as a hard precondition can wedge branch commit-list, merge-base, and snapshot resolution even though the logical lineage is readable; tolerate or recreate the derived ref before projecting from __manifest.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Dead-code sweep follow-up to the RFC-013 stack. No behavior change. - engine: delete the orphaned `validate_edge_cardinality` — the load path uses `validate_edge_cardinality_with_pending_loader` for every mode (including Overwrite, which it treats as the replacement table image), so the old standalone validator had no caller — and correct its sibling's now-stale doc reference. Gate `TableStore::append_batch` `#[cfg(test)]`: it is the inline- commit residual kept only for recovery test setup, with no non-test caller. - cluster: drop unused imports in `lib.rs`, delete the unused `ClusterStore::payload_display`, and raise `LiveGraphObservation` / `GraphObservationJson` / `PolicyTarget` to `pub(crate)` to match the functions that return them. Both lib crates now build warning-free.
…e string
The internal create-or-open idempotency fallbacks in `db/commit_graph.rs` and
`db/recovery_audit.rs` classified the "already exists" race by
`err.to_string().contains("Dataset already exists")` — a Lance display string,
not an API contract. A wording change upstream would silently break the fallback
(a re-create would error instead of opening the existing table). Match the typed
`lance::Error::DatasetAlreadyExists { .. }` variant instead — the same discipline
as the v3→v4 migration's not-found classifier — pinned by the new
`lance_surface_guards.rs::lance_error_dataset_already_exists_variant_exists`
guard so a Lance rename turns red instead of silently regressing.
Four `fn now_micros() -> Result<i64>` copies (commit_graph, recovery_audit,
graph_coordinator, manifest/graph) had already drifted: three mapped the
clock error to `OmniError::manifest("...UNIX_EPOCH...")` while recovery_audit
used `OmniError::manifest_internal("...unix epoch...")`. Replace all four with
one `pub(crate) fn now_micros()` in `db/mod.rs` (the majority `manifest`
variant), and repoint the eight call sites at `crate::db::now_micros()`. No
test asserts on the failure message, so unifying the variant is behavior-safe;
the timestamp-mapping contract can no longer fork across the rows it stamps.
`roll_back_sidecar` took `snapshot: &Snapshot` only to discard it with `let _ = snapshot;` — rollbacks now always publish (the restored HEAD plus a recovery-commit lineage row), so the snapshot is never read to decide whether to skip a publish. Remove the parameter, the two call-site arguments, and the suppressor. A signature must not advertise inputs it does not consume. The `Snapshot` import stays — `process_sidecar`, `roll_forward_all`, and `record_audit_recovery_rollforward` still take it.
…t-graph ref A v4 graph keeps its graph lineage in `__manifest` (RFC-013 Phase 7); the `_graph_commits.lance` branch ref is a derived artifact. An interrupted fork-reclaim or a `cleanup` race can drop that derived ref while the manifest lineage stays intact. Per invariants 7 + 15 a missing derived ref must not fail a logical read of the lineage. This wedge builds a real v4 `feature` branch (its `graph_head:feature` row in `__manifest`), force-deletes ONLY the `_graph_commits.lance` `feature` ref, then asserts the branch reads (`open_at_branch` / list-commits / `merge_base`) succeed from `__manifest` while a write that needs the derived ref (`create_branch`) fails loudly with the typed actionable error. Red against current code: `open_at_branch`'s hard `checkout_branch(branch)?` on the missing ref errors `OmniError::Lance` (Lance "Not found: _graph_commits.lance/tree/feature/_versions"), wedging the logical read.
…commits ref `CommitGraph::open_at_branch` did a hard `checkout_branch(branch)?` on the `_graph_commits.lance` branch ref before reading lineage — so a missing derived ref (an interrupted fork-reclaim, or a `cleanup` race) wedged the branch's commit-list / merge-base / snapshot resolution even though the lineage is readable from the authoritative `__manifest` (RFC-013 Phase 7). That is a derived/physical artifact failing a logical read — invariants 7 and 15. Make the held commits handle `Option<Dataset>` (mirroring `actor_dataset`). `open_at_branch` and `refresh` check out the derived ref best-effort: a typed not-found (`RefNotFound`/`NotFound`) yields a `None` handle while the read re-syncs from `__manifest`; any other open error still propagates. The manifest existence gate is unchanged — `load_commit_cache_for_branch` keeps its hard `?`, so a truly absent branch still fails loudly at the manifest. `create_branch` (the only writer that forks a ref) and the folded-in version lookup return a loud, actionable error on `None`, deferring repair to `cleanup`'s existing orphan reconciler rather than inlining a write on a read-side refresh. Reads (`head_commit`/`load_commits`/`get_commit`/`merge_base`) never touch the handle. Greens the wedge regression from the preceding commit.
`commit_v4_stamp_idempotently`'s retry loop used `0..=STAMP_RETRY_BUDGET`
(6 iterations) with an `attempt < STAMP_RETRY_BUDGET` guard, so the LAST
iteration's `IncompatibleTransaction` fell through to
`Err(e) => OmniError::Lance(...)` — stringified, non-retryable — instead of the
intended `RowLevelCasContention`, and the post-loop contention return was dead
code. The publisher's outer retry only re-runs `is_retryable_publish_conflict`,
so under sustained concurrent v3→v4 migration the one-time stamp bump could fail
instead of converging, defeating the idempotency the migration is supposed to add.
Fix the loop to `0..BUDGET` with an UNGUARDED `IncompatibleTransaction` arm: the
retryable variant is always handled inside the loop (re-open + same-value check +
retry), so it can never reach the stringifying catch-all, and the post-loop is the
SINGLE reachable exhaustion path — the typed `RowLevelCasContention`. The `Err(e)`
arm now catches only genuine non-contention errors. Apply the same range alignment
to the sibling merge loop in `migrate_v3_to_v4` (behaviorally correct today — its
`Err(err)` returns the already-typed contention — but it carried the identical
off-by-one structure the stamp loop was copied from; aligning both stops the next
copy from re-introducing it).
Test-first. The exhaustion path is otherwise near-unreachable — a real concurrent
winner stamps the same value, so the re-read returns Ok on the first retry — so a
new `migration.v4_stamp.force_incompatible` failpoint forces every stamp attempt to
lose, driving exhaustion deterministically. Against the pre-fix loop the new
`v4_stamp_exhaustion_returns_retryable_contention` test goes red with
`Lance("Incompatible transaction: injected failpoint triggered…")`; with the fix it
asserts the typed `RowLevelCasContention`. Found by automated review on #299.
Integrates #296 (recovery roll-forward converges on a concurrent manifest advance — the schema-apply→reopen flake fix) into this branch's RFC-013 Phase 7 work. Both sides rewrote the recovery path, so the conflicts were a SEMANTIC merge, not a textual pick — each side fixed a different real bug in the same code, and both survive: - recovery.rs: kept #296's convergence (roll_forward_all wrapped so an expected-version mismatch converges via converge_or_defer_roll_forward instead of failing the open) AND Phase-7's manifest-CAS recovery (roll_forward_all's 3-tuple graph_commit_id; roll_back_sidecar's dropped dead snapshot param + storage.as_ref). Reconciled converge_or_defer to Phase-7's audit model: on convergence the audit references the winner's folded graph_commit_id (the current graph_head), not a freshly minted one. - failpoints.rs: kept BOTH this branch's typed-Lance injectors (maybe_fail_lance_open/_incompatible) AND main's compile-checked `names` catalog; registered the branch's migration failpoint names and pointed every call site at the constants (the new failpoint_names_guard enforces this). - graph_coordinator.rs: took Phase-7's folded commit_changes_with_lineage publish (supersedes the old commit-then-record_graph_commit two-step), adopting main's names:: failpoint constants. - table_store.rs: both sides #[cfg(test)]-gated append_batch; kept main's comment. - testing.md: unioned both sides' failpoint-test entries. - #296 deleted the now-fixed schema-apply-recovery-flake handoff; updated the RFC-013 handoff's references to mark #296 merged. Gate (the objective check for a two-rewrite merge): cargo build --workspace clean; the UNION of both sides' suites green on the merge — failpoints 62/0 (incl. #296's convergence test + the migration tests), failpoint_names_guard, db::manifest 66/0, recovery 19/0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.
❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.
Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6e20d70. Configure here.
…ipwire The internal-schema migration chain (`migrate_internal_schema`) had a too-new ceiling but no floor, so every old `migrate_vN_…` arm and the v3 legacy readers it needs stay forever — the pile grows by one migration + readers + tests every schema version. Add `MIN_SUPPORTED_INTERNAL_SCHEMA_VERSION` (1 today, a pure no-op: `read_stamp` floors an absent stamp at 1 and no real graph carries 0) as the oldest stamp this binary opens; raising it is how the chain sheds old code. Collapse the one-sided `refuse_if_stamp_too_new` into `refuse_if_stamp_unsupported` checking both bounds, so the floor lands at all three stamp-enforcement sites — the write-path migrate dispatcher, the read-only open guard, and the branch lineage-read path (`commit_graph.rs`) — via one compiler-enforced rename. A hand-wired floor twin would have had to touch each site, and the branch-read path is easy to miss; one combined guard cannot half-enforce. Rename the read-only wrapper `refuse_if_internal_schema_unsupported` to match. A compile-time tripwire (`const _: () = assert!(LOWEST_REGISTERED_MIGRATION_SOURCE == MIN_SUPPORTED…)`) fails the build if a future floor bump forgets to delete the now-dead migration arm (or vice versa) — stronger than a runtime test, impossible to skip, and it doubles as the use that keeps the mirror const live. Tests: a sub-floor graph is refused in both open modes (twin of `future_stamp_is_refused_in_both_open_modes`); the guard accepts exactly [MIN, CURRENT]. No behavior change for any real graph. The retirement runbook lives on the `MIN_SUPPORTED` doc-comment + invariants.md.
…se recovery-converge audit commit Three review-surfaced fixes on the RFC-013 Phase 7 path. Publisher retry vs migration contention: `publish()` propagated a `load_publish_state` error fatally via `?`, so a `RowLevelCasContention` surfaced by the v3->v4 migration's exhausted merge/stamp budgets aborted the publish instead of being retried — only `merge_rows` conflicts hit the retry. This contradicted the migration's own design, which returns that typed error EXPECTING the publisher to re-run the load (by which point a concurrent winner has usually finished the migration, so the next scan is a no-op). Route a retryable load error through the same retry path as a retryable `merge_rows` conflict. Regression test (failpoints): a one-shot retryable contention injected into `load_publish_state` now commits via the retry; red without the fix (the write fails with the injected contention). Recovery-converge audit commit id: `converge_or_defer_roll_forward` recorded the branch HEAD as the audit row's `graph_commit_id`, but a concurrent user write can advance `graph_head` past the recovery commit between the winner's publish and this read — attributing the audit to a later, wrong commit. Use the latest `RECOVERY_ACTOR`-authored commit (what `publish_recovery_commit` mints), which is the recovery commit by construction. The audit's actor was already correct (it comes from `sidecar.actor_id`, not the commit). Dead param: drop the unused `snapshot` from `record_audit_recovery_rollforward` (removing the `let _ = snapshot;` suppressor). `storage` stays — it is used to delete the sidecar.
Folds in v0.7.2 (release #301) + RFC-013 Phase 7 (graph lineage in __manifest, internal schema v3→v4 migration #299; WriteTxn #298; recovery convergence #296) under the MCP branch. Conflict resolutions (2 files): - crates/omnigraph-server/Cargo.toml: take main's 0.7.2 path-dep constraints; keep our omnigraph-mcp dep (bumped to 0.7.2). - docs/releases/v0.8.0.md (add/add): both branches drafted v0.8.0 notes for the same next minor — combined them. v0.8.0 now documents BOTH the MCP surface (ours) and main's __manifest lineage fold + the breaking internal-schema-v4 upgrade-order requirement (kept prominent under Upgrade notes). Corrected our 'no breaking changes / on-disk format unchanged' line, which the v4 migration makes false. Coherence: omnigraph-mcp [package] + Cargo.lock bumped 0.7.1→0.7.2; openapi.json auto-merged to info.version 0.7.2 (no API-surface drift from the incoming engine-internal commits). Verification deferred to CI (no local rebuild).
…anded) Prepend a current-state section (§A) for the __manifest scan-amplification / version-chain thread: the problem, what landed on main (step 2a, Phase 7 #299), what is in flight on this branch / PR #307 (PR2 scan-halving, the owner-branch handoff fold fix, the PR2.1 ground-truth cost harness), the accurate measurement (per-write __manifest ops ~50->410 pre-PR2 vs 28->208 ground truth; the hidden 3-RPC freshness probe), the remaining roadmap (PR1a manual cleanup, PR3-scoping, deferred PR1b/PR4), critical files, and gotchas. Staleness fixes: Phase 7 was listed as a future "step 4" but landed as #299, so mark it LANDED in the TL;DR landed list and in the remaining-steps section.
* test(write_cost): served-regime __manifest scan tripwire Adds `internal_table_scans_grow_without_compaction`, the served-regime twin of `internal_table_scans_are_flat_in_history`. The flat gate `optimize()`s before every measured write, so it only proves the *compacted* invariant and stays green even when a served graph's per-write `__manifest` scan amplifies without bound. This tripwire measures the uncompacted regime and asserts the scan grows — green today, and it flips RED once the amplification is bounded (write-path warm-reuse + version-GC), at which point it inverts to a permanent `assert_flat` gate. RFC-013. * perf(engine): halve per-write __manifest scans (RFC-013 PR2) Cuts a same-branch write from ~4 to ~2 `__manifest` scans (measured 50->25 at depth 10, 410->205 at depth 100) with the OCC contract and snapshot isolation preserved: - #1a probe-gate the OCC re-capture in `commit_all` via `occ_snapshot_for_branch` (mirrors the read path's `resolve_target_inner`): reuse the warm coordinator when a cheap incarnation probe proves it current, fall through to a cold read on mismatch. - #1b fold the post-publish `known_state` in-memory from `existing_versions` plus the committed rows instead of an O(fragments) re-scan; extracted the shared `assemble_manifest_state` reduction so the fold is byte-identical to a scan, proven by the new `post_publish_fold_matches_fresh_reopen` test. - #1c project `read_manifest_scan` to the columns it reads (drop `base_objects` always, `object_id` on the table-state path). The two remaining publish scans (`load_publish_state` and the `use_index(false)` merge-insert join) stay O(fragments), bounded by compaction/version-GC (RFC-013 PR1, not in this change). * test(manifest): reproduce owner-branch handoff fold desync The PR #307 post-publish fold appends pending table_version rows after existing_versions, and assemble_manifest_state keeps the first equal-version entry. A same-version owner-branch handoff updates a table_version row in place at the same Lance version with a new table_branch (merge-insert UpdateAll on the deterministic version_object_id), so the warm coordinator keeps the stale fork while a fresh re-scan reflects the handoff. This test commits a handoff through the coordinator commit path (exercising the fold) and asserts the warm snapshot equals a fresh reopen. It is red against the current fold; the following commit turns it green. Flagged by Cursor Bugbot (High) and ChatGPT Codex (P2) on PR #307. * fix(engine): fold table_version rows by (table_key, version) identity fold_inputs now keys version entries by (table_key, table_version), the manifest row identity carried by the deterministic version_object_id that the merge-insert CAS uses. A pending row at the same identity replaces the pre-publish entry, mirroring merge-insert UpdateAll on disk. Previously the fold appended pending rows after existing_versions, so an owner-branch handoff left two equal-version entries and assemble_manifest_state retained the stale one. The fold input now carries the same one-row-per-(table_key, version) uniqueness a fresh scan produces, so both feed assemble_manifest_state equivalent inputs and the warm known_state stays byte-identical to read_manifest_state. This corrects the derivation's identity model structurally and applies to any same-version in-place update. Closes the PR #307 review finding. * test(cost): enable lance-io test-util for IO request diagnostics Gives IoStats.requests + assert_io_eq!, used by the cost harness to record the __manifest read log (method + path) for failure diagnostics. Dev-dependency only, so production builds (which exclude dev-deps) never compile it. * test(cost): rebuild IO harness on GraphIoMeter + incremental_stats Consolidate the per-op ProbeHandles into OpProbes plus a persistent GraphIoMeter, and read per-op deltas via lance's incremental_stats() (get-and-reset) instead of cumulative stats() -- the upstream per-request idiom (rust/lance/src/dataset/tests/dataset_io.rs). Add cost_harness(body): it installs one __manifest tracker for a whole test body, so the graph opens under it and every coordinator handle (init plus each post-publish reassignment) carries the same tracker. measure reuses that ambient tracker when present, making manifest_reads ground truth (warm probe plus cold scans, handle-age-irrelevant); outside cost_harness it falls back to a fresh per-op tracker (today's behavior). The body future is boxed so wrapping a whole test body does not overflow the test thread's stack. Also stash each op's __manifest read log on the meter for assert_io_eq!-style failure diagnostics (last_manifest_reads). Behavior-preserving: no test wraps its body in cost_harness yet, so measure takes the fallback path and every cost number is unchanged. write_cost and warm_read_cost stay green. * test(write_cost): ground-truth __manifest counting via cost_harness Wrap the three __manifest-asserting tests (flat, grow, ceiling) in cost_harness so manifest_reads is ground truth -- the warm-coordinator freshness probe rides a long-lived handle a per-op tracker installed at measure time cannot see. The flat/grow gates are depth-difference assertions, so the constant per-write probe offset cancels and they pass unchanged; the absolute ceiling is retightened from 34 to 24 (~18 measured = ~15 publish-path scans + ~3 probe RPCs) with the read log dumped on a breach. Add manifest_reads_capture_warm_probe: it measures the same warm write fresh-only and under cost_harness and asserts ground truth strictly exceeds fresh-only by the probe's RPCs (11 vs 14). Reverting the ground-truth wiring makes the two equal, so this guards that a write's warm-handle probe (3 object-store RPCs that were counted as a single version_probe) cannot silently escape manifest_reads again. * test(warm_read_cost): ground-truth __manifest counting via cost_harness Wrap the warm (== 0) manifest gates in cost_harness so manifest_reads is ground truth. A read's freshness probe is served from Lance's cached manifest at 0 object-store reads (unlike a write's probe, which re-reads after its commit), so the == 0 assertions hold with no re-baseline -- and now also catch any future warm-handle scan a per-op tracker would miss. The stale (> 0) tests are unaffected either way and stay on the fresh fallback. * docs(testing): document ground-truth cost harness (GraphIoMeter) The cost harness now reads incremental_stats() deltas and, under cost_harness, installs one __manifest tracker before the graph opens so manifest_reads is ground truth (handle-age-irrelevant). Note that version_probes is the probe call count and that ground truth reveals a write's probe does ~3 object-store RPCs. * docs(rfc-013): bring write-path handoff current (Thread B + Phase 7 landed) Prepend a current-state section (§A) for the __manifest scan-amplification / version-chain thread: the problem, what landed on main (step 2a, Phase 7 #299), what is in flight on this branch / PR #307 (PR2 scan-halving, the owner-branch handoff fold fix, the PR2.1 ground-truth cost harness), the accurate measurement (per-write __manifest ops ~50->410 pre-PR2 vs 28->208 ground truth; the hidden 3-RPC freshness probe), the remaining roadmap (PR1a manual cleanup, PR3-scoping, deferred PR1b/PR4), critical files, and gotchas. Staleness fixes: Phase 7 was listed as a future "step 4" but landed as #299, so mark it LANDED in the TL;DR landed list and in the remaining-steps section. * docs(rfc-013): refresh PR307 handoff state

Summary
This change makes
__manifestthe single source of graph lineage: a graphcommit and its lineage land in one merge-insert CAS, closing the
manifest→commit-graph atomicity gap and the parent-under-concurrency TOCTOU by
construction. This PR delivers the fold, the migration for existing graphs, a
concurrency acceptance gate, a publish-path scan fold, a bound on the
internal-schema migration framework, and the review-driven robustness fixes.
Internal-schema stamp bumps v3 → v4. Existing graphs migrate automatically on
their first read-write open; an older binary refuses a v4-stamped graph with the
standard upgrade error.
Single-source lineage
graph_commit+ mutablegraph_head:<branch>rows ride the sameMergeInsertBuildercommit as the table-version rows._graph_commits.lancenolonger receives commit rows (kept only as a Lance branch-ref carrier); the
commit-graph cache is now a pure projection of those manifest rows. The publisher
resolves each commit's parent inside the CAS retry loop, per attempt, from the
just-loaded
__manifest— so a CAS-conflict retry re-reads the advanced head andre-parents correctly. Two concurrent same-branch commits contend on the shared
graph_head:<branch>row: one wins, the loser retries and re-parents → a singlelinear DAG, no fork.
Migration — existing v3 graphs → v4
migrate_v3_to_v4backfills a graph's legacy lineage into__manifeston thefirst read-write open, per branch (idempotent, crash-safe, data-preserving). A
read-only open of an un-migrated graph sources the DAG from
_graph_commits.lancevia a stamp-gated transitional fallback, so reads stay correct until the first
write migrates it.
Four review-surfaced robustness findings, all fixed correct-by-construction and
test-first:
read_legacy_commit_cachenow treats only a genuine not-found as "no legacydata" and propagates any other open error — a transient/corrupt read can no
longer orphan real lineage permanently.
retry on the
graph_head:<branch>row-level CAS and an idempotent terminalstamp bump, so two runners opening the same legacy graph both converge instead
of one erroring the open.
commits and asserts
graph_head:<branch>, parents, and actors survive theper-branch migration.
> CURRENTrefusal, previouslymain-only, now also guards the branch lineage-read path (defense-in-depth).
Minimum-supported schema-version floor
The migration framework gains a lower bound so it stops accumulating forever.
MIN_SUPPORTED_INTERNAL_SCHEMA_VERSION(1 today — a pure no-op) is the oldeststamp this binary opens; the one-sided ceiling check is collapsed into a single
refuse_if_stamp_unsupportedguard enforced at all three stamp-read sites(write-path migrate, read-only open, branch lineage-read) via one compiler-enforced
rename. A compile-time tripwire couples the floor to the lowest registered
migration arm, so raising the floor to shed an old migration fails the build until
the now-dead arm is deleted. The retirement runbook lives on the
MIN_SUPPORTEDdoc-comment.
Publish-path scan fold
The publish path scanned
__manifesttwice (table state + a separate lineage readfor the parent); now one scan collects both. Per-write
__manifestreads drop44 → 26 at commit depth ~5, pinned by a
manifest_readssub-ceiling inwrite_cost.rs.Other review fixes
publish()propagated aload_publish_stateerror fatally; the migration's exhaustion-timeRowLevelCasContentionnow routes through the same retry as amerge_rowsconflict (regression test: a one-shot injected contention commits via the retry,
red without the fix).
RECOVERY_ACTOR-authored commit (the recovery commit by construction) ratherthan the branch head, which a concurrent user write could advance past.
now_microsintocrate::db::now_micros;dropped dead
snapshotparams fromroll_back_sidecarandrecord_audit_recovery_rollforward; made the commit-graph branch-ref handlebest-effort (
Option<Dataset>) so a missing/stale derived ref cannot wedge amanifest-readable branch.
Testing
cargo test --workspace --lockedgreen; the feature-gated failpoints suite green.failure with the predicted symptom before the fix turns it green.
graph_headone-winner contract: disjointsame-branch writers (2, and N=8 with app-level retry) converge to one linear
chain, never a fork; plus a bucket-gated S3 variant exercising the real
conditional-put CAS.
Upgrade notes
Internal-schema v3 → v4. The first read-write open of an existing graph migrates it
(per-branch, automatic). Read-only opens of an un-migrated graph still read correct
history via the legacy fallback. A binary without this change refuses a v4-stamped
graph with the standard upgrade error — roll forward, not back.