Skip to content

docs: add stable 0.92.0 changelog - #455

Merged
Leeeon233 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/stable-0-92-0-changelog
Sep 7, 2026
Merged

Leeeon233 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/stable-0-92-0-changelog

Conversation

@Leeeon233

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Risk: 🟢 low | Confidence: high — two localized changelog entries; Chinese copy confirmed and bilingual release metadata validated.

Related issue

Refs #439

Problem / pressure

The next stable client release needs matching Chinese and English public notes, including attribution for merged community contributions.

Summary

Add site-docs/content/changelog/{zh,en}/20260907.mdx for candidate 0.92.0. Chinese copy follows the confirmed concise format; English conveys the same changes. Both end with the contributor credits. The version remains subject to Release Please's final output.

Frozen public base: 4fa35d7f76ef4ffc83ecfbffe27a328cec6039e3. Only these two documents change; product and recursive submodule source stays fixed.

Before / after

Before: no 0.92.0 public entry. After: matching 2026-09-07 entries describing live session creation cards, Skills search, HTML downloads, and agent/chat/file preview improvements.

Included public PRs and contributor attribution

#439 #447 #148 #367 #286 #442 #440 #428 #409 #410 #416 #402 #386 #88 #213 #342 #360 #372 #431 #437 #413 #401

Thanks to @audichuang, @slashdevcorpse, @tommy0103, @Pleasurecruise, @hasak21, @specter119, @Astro-Han, @wibus-wee, and @zxch3n. The changelog keeps the credits together at the end.

Test plan

  • Prettier passed for both MDX files.
  • Production Electron changelog loader accepted exact version 0.92.0, date 2026-09-07, unique entries for English and Chinese, nonempty bodies, and size limits.
  • Checked that both languages contain the same contributor handles and three feature / nine improvement bullets.
  • Diff whitespace and two-file scope checked; no recursive gitlinks change.
  • Product source was already verified; this documentation-only change uses focused release-note validation without repeating product tests or a site build.

Context handoff

Instructions for reviewing agents

  • Review focus: Compare the two new entries for equivalent meaning, exact version/date, and complete contributor credits.
  • Decisions to challenge: Keep task-time display and in-app attachment retention claims within the actual merged fixes' scope.
  • Plausible failures / evidence gaps: Release Please may choose a different final version, requiring a metadata correction before release.

Authoring context

  • User goal / directives: Publish concise bilingual stable notes and acknowledge public contributions.
  • Constraints / non-goals: Limit the diff to the two changelog files; preserve all product source and submodule pins.
  • Risk-bearing decisions: 0.92.0 is a candidate derived from the feature range since 0.91.1 and remains subject to the generated release output.
  • Destructive or irreversible behavior: This adds public documents only and does not publish application artifacts or change stored user data.
  • Deliberately not done or tested: No product or site rebuild for a text-only addition; release-note parsing and formatting directly validate the changed contract.
  • Unknowns / confidence: Copy and metadata are verified; only the final generated release version remains provisional.

Add confirmed Chinese notes, equivalent English copy, and contributor credits.

Model: gpt-6
@Leeeon233
Leeeon233 marked this pull request as ready for review September 7, 2026 02:08
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-07T02:11:01.509929Z 02fc97c Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@Leeeon233
Leeeon233 merged commit 17c9dc3 into main Sep 7, 2026
7 of 10 checks passed
@Leeeon233
Leeeon233 deleted the docs/stable-0-92-0-changelog branch September 7, 2026 02:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant