docs(ci): fix stale vitest.config.ts comment about lib/cli-error.js coverage

[lourincedaging0-commits]

Closes #7435

What

vitest.config.ts's comment above the packages/loopover-mcp/lib/**/*.js coverage.include entry claimed lib/cli-error.js had no in-process test. That was true when written (80b59c64), but #7409 (merged 2026-07-20) added test/unit/mcp-cli-error.test.ts, which imports cli-error.js in-process and exercises all three of its exports. The comment was never updated, so it now tells a contributor something false about the package's test-coverage state.

This corrects the sentence to reflect that all five of the package's lib/ files (format-table/local-branch/redact-local-path/telemetry/cli-error) now have in-process tests.

Scope

• Comment-only — no coverage.include/coverage.exclude glob or any other behavior changed (verified: the diff is 4 comment lines).
• Nothing to regression-test (no executable code path affected).

[superagent-security]

Superagent didn't find any vulnerabilities or security issues in this PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.36%. Comparing base (fbd1cba) to head (be2d97c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7472   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.36%   91.36%           
=======================================
  Files         717      717           
  Lines       73016    73016           
  Branches    21628    21631    +3     
=======================================
  Hits        66713    66713           
  Misses       5265     5265           
  Partials     1038     1038           

Flag	Coverage Δ
shard-1	34.16% <ø> (ø)
shard-2	39.31% <ø> (ø)
shard-3	32.62% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
shard-4	39.53% <ø> (ø)
shard-5	36.58% <ø> (ø)
shard-6	34.32% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[loopover-orb]

Tip

✅ LoopOver review result - approve/merge recommended

_{Review updated: 2026-07-20 11:34:41 UTC}

1 file · 1 AI reviewer · no blockers · readiness 98/100 · CI green · clean

✅ Suggested Action - Approve/Merge

• safe to merge

Review summary
This is a comment-only correction in vitest.config.ts updating a stale coverage note: it now correctly states all 5 packages/loopover-mcp/lib files (including cli-error.js) have in-process test coverage as of #7409, rather than the outdated claim that cli-error.js had none. The diff is purely a comment change with no effect on coverage.include/exclude globs or any executable behavior, and the referenced test/unit/mcp-cli-error.test.ts landing in #7409 is a verifiable, plausible historical event. No test changes are needed since nothing executable changed.

Nits — 3 non-blocking

• Not tied to an explicit maintainer-authorized issue beyond the closes-docs(ci): fix stale vitest.config.ts comment claiming lib/cli-error.js has no in-process test #7435 reference in the description — worth confirming docs(ci): fix stale vitest.config.ts comment claiming lib/cli-error.js has no in-process test #7435 is itself the right eligible issue for a comment-only doc fix.
• None needed beyond what's already done — this is a minimal, well-scoped comment fix.
• Code changes lack test evidence — Add focused regression tests or explain why existing coverage is sufficient.

Decision drivers

• ✅ Code review — No blockers (1 reviewer)
• ✅ Gate result — Passing (No configured blocker found.)

Context & advisory signals — never blocks the verdict

Signal	Result	Evidence
Linked issue	✅ Linked	#7435
Related work	✅ No active overlap found	No same-issue or scoped active PR overlap found.
Change scope	✅ 20/20	Low review scope from cached public metadata (1 linked issue).
Validation posture	✅ 25/25	PR body includes validation/test evidence.
Contributor workload	✅ 10/10	Author activity: 97 registered-repo PR(s), 46 merged, 5 issue(s).
Contributor context	✅ Confirmed Gittensor contributor	lourincedaging0-commits; Gittensor profile; 97 PR(s), 5 issue(s).
Improvement	ℹ️ None detected	risk: low · value: none · LLM: minor

Linked issue satisfaction

Addressed
The diff replaces the stale sentence claiming lib/cli-error.js has no in-process test with an accurate statement that all 5 lib files including cli-error.js now have in-process tests, citing PR #7409, and touches only the comment block without altering any include/exclude globs.

Review context

• Author: lourincedaging0-commits
• Role context: outside_contributor
• Public audience mode: oss maintainer
• Lane context: Repository is configured for direct PR review.
• Public profile languages: HTML
• Official Gittensor activity: 97 PR(s), 5 issue(s).
• PR-specific overlap: none found.

Contributor next steps

• Keep the PR focused and include validation evidence before maintainer review.

Signal definitions

• Related work = same linked issue, overlapping active PRs, or title/path similarity.
• Change scope = cached public metadata such as size labels, draft state, and review-burden hints.
• Validation posture = whether the PR provides enough public validation/test evidence for maintainer review.
• Contributor workload = public contributor activity and cleanup pressure, not a repo-wide quality failure.
• Contributor context = public GitHub/Gittensor identity context; non-Gittensor status is not a blocker.

🧪 Chat with LoopOver

Ask LoopOver a question about this PR directly in a comment — grounded only in the same cached, public-safe facts shown above, never a new claim.

• @loopover ask <question> answers contribution-quality Q&A with source citations and freshness.
• @loopover chat <question> answers in natural prose from cached decision-pack facts via local inference (maintainer/collaborator; read-only).
• A plain-language @loopover mention with a real question is routed to the closest matching read-only command automatically — no exact syntax required.

Full command reference: https://loopover.ai/docs/loopover-commands

🧪 Experimental — new and may change.

_{🟩 Safe / merged · 🟦 Advisory · 🟨 Held for review · 🟥 Blocked / closed}

---

💰 Earn for open-source contributions like this. Gittensor lets GitHub contributors earn for the work they already do — register to start earning →.

Checked by LoopOver, a quiet PR intelligence layer for OSS maintainers.

• Re-run LoopOver review

[loopover-orb]

LoopOver approves — the gate is satisfied and CI is green.