feat(app): turn registration readiness into a guided owner workflow

[jonathanchang31]

Summary

Turns the owner-facing registration workspace into a guided workflow instead of only a raw readiness report. The owner app now groups readiness into policy, data quality, queue health, docs/onboarding, and maintainer capacity, shows accepted / needs cleanup / not ready states, and surfaces concrete remediation steps or explicit manual follow-up reasons for each bucket.

Related Issue

Closes: #246

Change Type

• Feature
• UI / UX update
• Validation / test update
• Bug fix
• Refactor
• Performance improvement
• Dependency change

Real Behavior Proof

Validated locally against the real app route:

GET http://127.0.0.1:4174/app/owner
HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Validated browser-rendered owner workflow states with Playwright using controlled API responses:

API response proof captured during browser validation:

200 /v1/auth/session
200 /v1/repos/entrius/gittensor/registration-readiness
200 /v1/repos/entrius/gittensor/gittensor-config-recommendation
404 /v1/repos/entrius/gittensor/gittensor-config-recommendation   # intentional for blocked scenario

Checklist

• I analyzed issue feat(app): turn registration readiness into a guided owner workflow #246 and its linked roadmap context.
• I reviewed linked parent issues roadmap(phase 3): repo owner intake console #236 and roadmap: Gittensory ecosystem adoption v1 #127.
• I implemented the guided owner workflow in the live owner app surface.
• I updated focused tests instead of relying on green checks alone.
• I validated the project locally.
• I validated the owner route returns 200 OK.
• I captured screenshot evidence for accepted / needs-cleanup / not-ready states.
• I avoided unrelated dependency or lockfile churn.

UI Evidence

[ghost]

Note

Gittensory Gate skipped

PR closed before full evaluation. No late first comment was created.

Signal	Result	Evidence	Action
Gate result	⚠️ Skipped	#487 is no longer open.	No action.

---

Checked by Gittensory, a quiet PR intelligence layer for OSS maintainers.

[superagent-security]

Superagent didn't find any vulnerabilities or security issues in this PR.

[JSONbored]

@jonathanchang31 this is good to land.

A few notes:

• The owner workflow is wired into the real app surface, not a detached mock.
• The readiness buckets and remediation states match the issue direction.
• Screenshot evidence is present; clickable thumbnail formatting would be better next time, but it is not blocking here.
• No code changes requested.

[JSONbored]

@jonathanchang31 please fix failing CI

[jonathanchang31]

@JSONbored Could you plz review my PR again? Thanks! && I love Gittensory.

[JSONbored]

@jonathanchang31 this is good to land.

A few notes:

• The owner workflow is now visible in the real /app/owner surface, not just in helper code.
• The readiness buckets, next actions, and supporting signals match #246.
• Screenshot evidence is present; next time, use smaller clickable thumbnails with state captions, but that is not blocking here.
• CI is green on the current head.

No code changes requested.