feat(agent): add risk-adjusted action portfolio - #219
Merged
JSONbored merged 7 commits intoJun 2, 2026
Conversation
JSONbored
requested changes
Jun 2, 2026
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@MkDev11 the portfolio grouping is a useful direction, and the deterministic buckets make the decision pack easier to reason about.
A few notes:
- CI is green on the branch.
- The branch is now stale against current
main. - Conflicts are in
src/services/agent-orchestrator.tsandtest/unit/decision-pack.test.ts. - It also touches
apps/gittensory-ui/public/openapi.json; the frontend-touch screenshot rule still needs to be satisfied with actual evidence.
Required changes:
- Resolve the current merge conflicts.
- Re-run OpenAPI generation/checks after the conflict fix.
- Attach screenshot/recording evidence for the frontend-touched surface, or remove the frontend artifact change if it is unnecessary.
Validation expected:
- Re-run
npm run test:ci. - Confirm portfolio, orchestrator, and decision-pack tests pass after the rebase.
This was referenced Jun 2, 2026
Resolve conflicts in agent-orchestrator.ts and decision-pack.test.ts by keeping both the action-portfolio additions (this branch) and the evidence-graph additions (main) on the context snapshot payload and the determinism test.
mkdev5
force-pushed
the
feat/risk-adjusted-action-portfolio
branch
from
June 2, 2026 06:54
cd6fa61 to
d99f4a3
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@JSONbored fixed the conflicts |
JSONbored
previously requested changes
Jun 2, 2026
JSONbored
left a comment
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@MkDev11 please fix merge conflicts.
…action-portfolio # Conflicts: # apps/gittensory-ui/public/openapi.json # src/openapi/schemas.ts
JSONbored
dismissed
their stale review
June 2, 2026 16:41
@MkDev11 no current code changes requested. The branch is clean, CI is green, and the old conflict blocker appears resolved.
This was referenced Jun 2, 2026
Closed
12 tasks
This was referenced Jul 2, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Closes #94
Scope
CONTRIBUTING.mdand does not reintroduce GitHub Pages, VitePress,site/, orCNAME.Validation
git diff --checknpm run actionlintnpm run typechecknpm run test:coveragelocally; global coverage stays at or above 97% for lines, statements, functions, and branches (aim for 98%+ branch coverage locally so CI variance does not fail near the threshold)npm run test:workersnpm run build:mcpnpm run test:mcp-packnpm run ui:openapi:checknpm run ui:lintnpm run ui:typechecknpm run ui:buildnpm audit --audit-level=moderateIf any required check was skipped, explain why:
npm run test:cipassed end to end. Local coverage summary: statements 99.02%, branches 97.06%, functions 98.11%, lines 99.62%.Safety
Notes
ContributorDecisionPacknow includesactionPortfolio; the UI OpenAPI artifact was regenerated.CONTRIBUTING.mdguidance for ordinary feature PRs.