Skip to content

Repo-agnostic capability audit #4780

Description

@JSONbored

Problem: Today's discovery and claim code was built against gittensory's own repos, labels, and scoring conventions. Before generalizing it, someone needs to know exactly everywhere it currently assumes "this specific ecosystem" rather than "an arbitrary repo."

Area: Product spec / audit

Proposal: Audit the miner package's discovery, claim, and scoring code, producing a concrete checklist of every hardcoded or implicitly gittensory-specific assumption (label names, issue-template shape, scoring weights, repo list) that must become per-tenant configuration instead of a default.

Deliverables:

Acceptance criteria:

Resources:

  • The miner package's discovery, claim, and ledger modules.

Boundaries:

  • Audit and document only — no code changes in this issue.

Part of #4778.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    gittensor:priorityMaintainer-selected Gittensor priority — scores a 1.5x multiplier.

    Projects

    Status
    Done

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions