Raised by: @nigel81562
Summary: The statement "an IES Link can lose or gain intermediate Nodes over time" is inconsistent with IES 4D principles. In a 4D model, a Link does not change — it has different configurations of intermediate Nodes across its temporal parts (Link and Node States).
Proposed resolution direction: Replace "can lose or gain" language with 4D-consistent language: "a Link may have different intermediate Node configurations across its lifetime, represented as States of the Link." Audit the Networks documentation for similar endurantist phrasing.
Raised by: @nigel81562
Summary: The statement "an IES Link can lose or gain intermediate Nodes over time" is inconsistent with IES 4D principles. In a 4D model, a
Linkdoes not change — it has different configurations of intermediateNodesacross its temporal parts (LinkandNodeStates).Proposed resolution direction: Replace "can lose or gain" language with 4D-consistent language: "a
Linkmay have different intermediateNodeconfigurations across its lifetime, represented asStatesof theLink." Audit the Networks documentation for similar endurantist phrasing.