adding security_policy field in regionBackendService resource#8208
Conversation
|
Hello! I am a robot who works on Magic Modules PRs. I've detected that you're a community contributor. @slevenick, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to assist you and help review your changes. ❓ First time contributing? Click here for more detailsYour assigned reviewer will help review your code by:
You can help make sure that review is quick by running local tests and ensuring they're passing in between each push you make to your PR's branch. Also, try to leave a comment with each push you make, as pushes generally don't generate emails. If your reviewer doesn't get back to you within a week after your most recent change, please feel free to leave a comment on the issue asking them to take a look! In the absence of a dedicated review dashboard most maintainers manage their pending reviews through email, and those will sometimes get lost in their inbox. |
slevenick
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like there are merge conflicts. Can you fix those?
|
@slevenick Thanks for warning me that. I fixed the conflicts. Could you please continue with the code review? |
|
@slevenick Is there anything else I have to do to proceed with the code review? Thanks |
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)) Missing test reportYour PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test. Resource: Please add acceptance tests which include these fields. |
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Action takenFound 3 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccContainerAwsNodePool_BetaBasicHandWritten|TestAccComputeFirewallPolicyRule_multipleRules|TestAccComputeRegionBackendService_withSecurityPolicy |
|
Tests passed during RECORDING mode: Tests failed during RECORDING mode: Please fix these to complete your PR |
…-policy-in-region-backend-service
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)) Missing test reportYour PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test. Resource: Please add acceptance tests which include these fields. |
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Action takenFound 3 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccComputeRegionBackendService_withSecurityPolicy|TestAccComputeFirewallPolicyRule_multipleRules|TestAccContainerAwsNodePool_BetaBasicHandWritten |
|
Rerun these tests in REPLAYING mode to catch issues
|
|
@slevenick Is there anything else from my side? Thanks |
slevenick
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me. Only issue is that the YAML file is not passing linting, can you fix that?
I'm not sure exactly why, it looks fine to my eye, but you may need to run the linter locally to see the error
…-policy-in-region-backend-service
Thanks for pointing that out. I had duplicated the "min_version: beta" definition. Ready for review again. |
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)) Missing test reportYour PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test. Resource: Please add acceptance tests which include these fields. |
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Action takenFound 3 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccSpannerDatabaseIamPolicy|TestAccComputeFirewallPolicyRule_multipleRules|TestAccContainerAwsNodePool_BetaBasicHandWritten |
|
Rerun these tests in REPLAYING mode to catch issues
|
* adding security_policy field in regionBackendService resource * fixing code review to use http calls instead of lib in RegionBackendService * removing ParseSecurityPolicyRegionalFieldValue method * fixing lint issue
…CloudPlatform#8208) * adding security_policy field in regionBackendService resource * fixing code review to use http calls instead of lib in RegionBackendService * removing ParseSecurityPolicyRegionalFieldValue method * fixing lint issue
…CloudPlatform#8208) * adding security_policy field in regionBackendService resource * fixing code review to use http calls instead of lib in RegionBackendService * removing ParseSecurityPolicyRegionalFieldValue method * fixing lint issue
…CloudPlatform#8208) * adding security_policy field in regionBackendService resource * fixing code review to use http calls instead of lib in RegionBackendService * removing ParseSecurityPolicyRegionalFieldValue method * fixing lint issue
* adding security_policy field in regionBackendService resource * fixing code review to use http calls instead of lib in RegionBackendService * removing ParseSecurityPolicyRegionalFieldValue method * fixing lint issue
…CloudPlatform#8208) * adding security_policy field in regionBackendService resource * fixing code review to use http calls instead of lib in RegionBackendService * removing ParseSecurityPolicyRegionalFieldValue method * fixing lint issue
fixes:
hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#14987
Adding security_policy field in google_compute_region_backend_service resource.
If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:
make testandmake lintin the generated providers to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)