Collaboration & Orchestration

[mhingston]

Feature Request: Collaboration & Orchestration

Problem Description

Spec writing is inherently collaborative, but current tools are often single-player or rely on generic git conflicts. Complex specs may benefit from multiple AI "eyes" (agents) to review or brainstorm.

Proposed Solution

1. Multi-user Workspaces: Shared views, RBAC, and real-time edits.
2. Discussion Threads: Google-Docs-style comments on spec sections.
3. Multi-Agent Orchestration: Parallel pipelines where different agents review security, performance, or logic of a spec.
4. Consensus Building: Aggregating results from multiple models.

Benefits

• Better specs through diverse input (human and AI).
• Streamlined team workflows.
• Higher confidence in spec quality.

Industry Inspiration

• Traycer: "Multi-Agent Orchestration Framework" - parallel planning and consensus.

[clay-good]

Thanks for raising this, @mhingston 🙏

This is about Multi-user workspaces/RBAC, inline comments, multi-agent orchestration, consensus. — an open-ended feature/design idea rather than a discrete, PR-actionable bug or task. To honor it properly we've moved it to Discussions, where it can keep evolving with community input and you can re-engage anytime:

👉 #1546

The original issue (and any comments) stays here for the record, so nothing is lost — please continue the conversation in the discussion above. Closing the issue in favor of that thread.