You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Impact of Text Prompts on Video Generation Results #50
In the paper, the block diagram suggests that different videos are assigned corresponding text prompts. However, in the inference examples, only very short prompts are used.
1.Prompt Importance Comparison:
Has there been any comparative analysis on how prompt length/structure affects the final results?
Is the model relatively insensitive to prompts because Wan 2.1 inherently supports short prompts for image-to-video generation?
Conversely, would models like DiT—which rely on longer, structured prompts—be more sensitive to prompt variations?
2.Follow-up Questions:
Were there ablation studies on prompt design (e.g., concise vs. detailed descriptions)?
If prompt sensitivity varies across architectures, could this explain performance differences in controlled experiments?
This would help clarify the role of text conditioning in video generation. Thanks!
Activity