[Onyx bump] Bump react-native-onyx from 3.0.98 to 3.0.100

[LukasMod]

Explanation of Change

This PR bumps Onyx from 3.0.98 to 3.0.100 (diff), which includes the following changes:

• 3.0.99 — fix: add getSnapshot memoizedShallowEqual to skip rerenders react-native-onyx#819: Classify SQLite disk-pressure errors (disk I/O error, unable to open database file) into a new DISK_PRESSURE class and stop blindly retrying them; log one throttled alert + a storage quota snapshot (with free-disk bytes on native) instead. Related to [Metrics] Investigate remaining ~1-2s ManualSendMessage spans #95584 (companion App PR: fix: add getSnapshot memoizedShallowEqual to skip rerenders #97952).

• 3.0.100 — Batch collection member removals and coalesce cross-tab sync events react-native-onyx#820: Batches collection member removals into a single cross-tab sync event (and skips no-op removals), and coalesces incoming sync-event floods on the receiving side. This removes the per-key transactionViolations_ event storm (~2,000 events per boot on heavy accounts) that made two tabs crash each other ([Due for payment 2026-09-02] [$250] Certain actions in LHN don't sync between tabs #94839; companion App PR: [TESTING ONLY] Pin react-native-onyx to batch-collection-removals fix (Onyx #820) #98121). - It was already introduced as a onyx patch to unblock onyx queue, which is mentioned here [Onyx bump] Bump react-native-onyx from 3.0.95 to 3.0.98 #99051 - local patch removed.

Fixed Issues

$ #95584
$ #94839
PROPOSAL:

Tests

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Manual test steps per included change:

For Expensify/react-native-onyx#819 (add getSnapshot memoizedShallowEqual to skip rerenders):

No visible changes. Smoke tests:

Test 1: Send messages in open report

1. As account A, open Report A
2. Send 5 messages in quick succession
3. Confirm each message appears
4. Confirm the LHN row for Report A shows the last sent message as its preview

Test 2: Rapid report switching

1. As account A, switch between Report A and Report B 5 times quickly
2. Confirm each report shows its own content immediately
3. Confirm no report gets stuck in a loading skeleton
4. Send a message mid-switching and confirm it lands in the right report

Test 3: New subscriber mounts on an already-open report

1. As account A, open Report A and note its content
2. Open the report details page (header click), then a thread on any message
3. Close both and return to the report
4. As account B, send a message to Report A
5. Confirm the message appears in the open report and the LHN preview updates

Test 4: Report data change reaches all subscribers

1. As account A, open a group chat or workspace room
2. Rename the room (or update its description)
3. Confirm the header, the report screen, and the LHN row all show the new name
4. Pin and unpin the report and confirm the LHN reorders both times

Test 5: Receive messages while report is open

1. As account A, keep Report A open
2. As account B, send 3 messages to Report A, one with an edit right after sending
3. Confirm all messages and the edit appear for account A in real time
4. As account B, add a reaction to the last message and confirm it appears for account A

Test 6: Fresh key and loading transitions

1. As account A, sign out and sign back in
2. Open a chat that was never o
3. Confirm the skeleton is replaced by content and never gets stuck on loading
4. Start a brand-new DM with a new user and send a message
5. Confirm the new chat renders and appears in the LHN

For Expensify/react-native-onyx#820 (Batch collection member removals and coalesce cross-tab sync events):

With two NewDot tabs signed in to the same heavy account (e.g. Applause):

1. Refresh both tabs and stay in Tab A. Wait ~30 seconds. Verify neither tab crashes and both stay responsive.
2. In Tab A: pin/unpin a report, draft a message in a mid-list report, mark a report unread/read, and send a message. Verify each action syncs to Tab B without refreshing.
3. In Tab A, import a really heavy Onyx state (Account > Troubleshoot > Import Onyx state). Verify Tab B adopts the imported state.
4. Go to Account > Troubleshoot > Clear cache and restart. Verify Tab B is restored to the normal state as well.

Offline tests

QA Steps

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
  • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
  • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

memoizedShallowEqual-android-1.mov

memoizedShallowEqual-android-2.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

memoizedShallowEqual-android-web.mov

iOS: Native

memoizedShallowEqual-ios.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

memoizedShallowEqual-ios-web.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

memoizedShallowEqual:

Test 1-3

memoizedShallowEqual-web-1-3.mov

Test 3-4

memoizedShallowEqual-web-3b-4.mov

Test 5

memoizedShallowEqual-web-5.mov

Batch collection member:

Test 1-2

Batch-collection-1.2a.mov

Test 2

Batch-collection-1.2b.mov

Test 3

Batch-collection-3.mov

Test 4

Batch-collection-4.mov

[github-actions]

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

[melvin-bot]

@FitseTLT @abdulrahuman5196 @situchan One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[github-actions]

🚧 mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

[FitseTLT]

Reviewer Checklist

• I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
• I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
  • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
  • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
  • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
• I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
• I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
  • Android: HybridApp
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: HybridApp
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
• I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
• If a new component is created I verified that:
  • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
  • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
  • The file is named correctly
  • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
  • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
  • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
  • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
  • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
  • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
• I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp

2026-08-25.00-56-38.mp4

Android: mWeb Chrome

2026-08-25.00-03-10.mp4

iOS: HybridApp

iOS: mWeb Safari

2026-08-24.23-10-50.mp4

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

2026-08-24.22-50-41.mp4

[FitseTLT]

Testing Looks Good 🎉

[mountiny]

Thanks!

[github-actions]

🚧 mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

[OSBotify]

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

[github-actions]

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #99301.

Android 🤖	iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-android-Adhoc-935235c-dcbf3cd-d91d38e1addb0e27e42acb5bcbd59ec255ff1a6d/index.html	https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-ios-device-AdHoc-935235c-dcbf3cd-e1caa716561ace842703c505ecc283772c6b6543/index.html

Web 🕸️
https://99301.pr-testing.expensify.com

---

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.4.61-0 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 9.4.61-4 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

• Android