Skip to content

Align ButtonComposed wrapper props (variant/buttonVariant/buttonSize) - #99080

Merged
mountiny merged 7 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:Guccio163/button/propsCleanup
Aug 30, 2026
Merged

mountiny merged 7 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:Guccio163/button/propsCleanup

Conversation

@Guccio163

@Guccio163 Guccio163 commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Aligns several ButtonComposed wrapper components' public props to match ButtonComposed's own prop shapes, so no boolean->enum conversion happens at any layer between the caller and the actual <Button>. Pure rename/retype refactor, no intended behavior change.

  • ConfirmModal/ConfirmContent: success/danger booleans -> single variant/buttonVariant (ButtonVariant, default SUCCESS). Updated every call site (JSX props, showConfirmModal/showConfirmModalAfterMoreMenuDismiss object calls, getDiscardChangesModalConfig.ts).
  • EmptyStateComponent's EmptyStateButton config type (shared by Table.EmptyState, TableEmptyState, GenericEmptyStateComponent): success?: boolean -> buttonVariant?: ButtonVariant. Updated every button-config call site, including a duplicated inline type in SearchUIUtils.ts.
  • FormAlertWithSubmitButton + its Form/FormWrapper forwarding chain: isSubmitActionDangerous -> buttonVariant, shouldBlendOpacity -> blendButtonOpacity. Renamed through every layer (Form -> FormWrapper -> FormAlertWithSubmitButton) so the value reaches <Button> unconverted.
  • AmountFilterContent: largeButton -> buttonSize (ValueOf<typeof CONST.BUTTON_SIZE>, excluding SMALL — the old boolean only ever toggled MEDIUM/LARGE).
  • Removed two dead props found while doing the above: FormAlertWithSubmitButton's size flag (no caller ever set it) and FormWrapper's blend-opacity flag (not even declared on Form's public type, so unreachable from any <Form> caller).

Fixed Issues

$ #99057
PROPOSAL:

Tests

5 button testing categories with test steps
  • Open a destructive ConfirmModal (e.g. delete a workspace, or Settings -> Security -> Close Account) and verify the confirm button still renders red
      1. Settings -> Security -> tap "Close account"
      1. On the Close Account page, enter a reason in the text field
      1. Tap the red "Close account" submit button at the bottom
      1. A second confirm dialog pops up: title "Closing your account cannot be undone", confirm button "Yes, continue"
      1. Verify that confirm button renders red
      1. Tap Cancel — do not actually confirm (destructive, irreversible)
  • Open a non-destructive ConfirmModal with a cancel button and verify the confirm button still renders green
      1. Go to a workspace with 2+ members
      1. Workspaces list -> tap the "⋯" (three-dot) menu on that workspace row -> "Duplicate workspace"
      1. On the "Select features to duplicate" page, check the "Members" feature
      1. Tap "Continue" at the bottom
      1. A confirm dialog appears: prompt mentions duplicating members, confirm button text "Proceed", cancel button "Cancel"
      1. Verify the confirm button renders green
      1. Tap Cancel
  • "Add expense" button in EmptyStateComponent still renders green and works
      1. Go to Reports (Search)
      1. Switch to / land on the "Expenses" view
      1. If it has zero expenses (new account, or filter to a date range with none), you land on "No expenses yet" empty state
      1. Verify the "Create expense" button renders green
  • Reject expense report / Close Account submit button still renders red and submits
    • The same steps as "Open a destructive ConfirmModal"
  • Search -> Amount filter -> Confirm button still renders at expected large size
      1. Shrink your browser window below the small-screen breakpoint (or test on mobile web/native)
      1. Search -> tap "Filters"
      1. Since it's small screen, this navigates to the full-screen "Advanced filters" page (not the popup)
      1. Tap "Total amount"
      1. Confirm button at the bottom
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
step2.mov
step3 step5
steps1_4.mov

…to ButtonComposed

Rename isSubmitActionDangerous/useSmallerSubmitButtonSize/shouldBlendOpacity
(and their Form/FormWrapper forwarding chain) to buttonVariant/buttonSize/
blendButtonOpacity, matching ButtonComposed's own prop shapes so no
boolean-to-enum conversion happens along the way. Same for AmountFilterContent's
largeButton -> buttonSize. Drop the dead buttonSize (FormAlertWithSubmitButton)
and submitButtonBlendOpacity (FormWrapper) props that no caller ever set.
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@Guccio163 Guccio163 changed the title BookCallButton wrappers variant props Align ButtonComposed wrapper props (variant/buttonVariant/buttonSize) Aug 20, 2026
CopyPolicySettingsProgressModalTest and LeaveWorkspaceFlowTest were
left checking success/danger — missed earlier because the migration
sweep only searched src/, not tests/. Update to assert buttonVariant.
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...mponents/AccountingConnectionConfirmationModal.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/components/ConfirmContent.tsx 88.88% <100.00%> (-0.18%) ⬇️
src/components/ConfirmModal.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/EmptyStateComponent/index.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/Form/FormWrapper.tsx 90.32% <ø> (-0.31%) ⬇️
src/components/FormAlertWithSubmitButton.tsx 97.14% <100.00%> (+4.64%) ⬆️
src/components/GPSInProgressModal/index.native.tsx 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...aderActions/MoneyReportHeaderSelectionDropdown.tsx 0.92% <ø> (ø)
.../components/MoneyRequestHeaderSecondaryActions.tsx 0.45% <ø> (ø)
...tReportView/SearchMoneyRequestReportEmptyState.tsx 2.17% <ø> (ø)
... and 111 more
... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@Guccio163
Guccio163 marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2026 20:22
@Guccio163
Guccio163 requested review from a team as code owners August 20, 2026 20:22
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from a team, ZhenjaHorbach and joekaufmanexpensify and removed request for a team August 20, 2026 20:22
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ZhenjaHorbach Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from flaviadefaria and removed request for a team August 20, 2026 20:22
@joekaufmanexpensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No Product review needed.

@joekaufmanexpensify
joekaufmanexpensify removed their request for review August 20, 2026 22:04
@ZhenjaHorbach

ZhenjaHorbach commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
2026-08-27.11.08.04.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
2026-08-27.11.08.04.mov
iOS: HybridApp
2026-08-27.11.06.39.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
2026-08-27.10.56.59.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
2026-08-27.10.52.53.mov

@ZhenjaHorbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Working on this PR
Will complete today or tomorrow!

@ZhenjaHorbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Guccio163
But can you fix conflicts, please?

@Guccio163

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ZhenjaHorbach done

@ZhenjaHorbach

ZhenjaHorbach commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Changes look good!

@ZhenjaHorbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Guccio163
But can you fix the conflicts again, please?

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested a review from mountiny August 27, 2026 09:22
@Guccio163

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ZhenjaHorbach done

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this clean up

@mountiny
mountiny merged commit 49ab2f3 into Expensify:main Aug 30, 2026
34 of 35 checks passed
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.4.65-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No help site changes are required for this PR, so I did not create a draft docs PR.

This is a type-level refactor of internal React component props. Nothing a help site article describes has changed.

What I checked

No user-facing surface changed:

  • No files under docs/ were touched.
  • No files under src/languages/ were touched — no UI copy, button label, tab name, or setting label changed.
  • The only diff line touching translate() is a reformat of the existing translate('iou.addExpense') call, with the same key.

Every change is a 1:1 prop rename with an equivalent value:

  • success: truebuttonVariant: CONST.BUTTON_VARIANT.SUCCESS
  • danger: truebuttonVariant: CONST.BUTTON_VARIANT.DANGER
  • isSubmitActionDangerousbuttonVariant, shouldBlendOpacityblendButtonOpacity
  • largeButtonbuttonSize

Buttons keep the same text, the same colors, and the same actions. The two removed props were dead code with no callers.

Help site articles document workflows, settings, and features — for example how to close an account, delete a workspace, or use Advanced filters. None of those steps, screens, or labels changed here, so no article text becomes inaccurate.

@Guccio163, please confirm you agree that no help site updates are needed. If you think an article does need updating because of this change, reply with the article and what should change, and I'll open the draft PR.


view run

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.4.65-3 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants