Skip to content

Bump Android module targetSdkVersion and compileSdkVersion to 36 - #96774

Merged
marcaaron merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
marcaaron-target-api-36
Jul 27, 2026
Merged

marcaaron merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
marcaaron-target-api-36

Conversation

@marcaaron

@marcaaron marcaaron commented Jul 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Bumps `targetSdkVersion` and `compileSdkVersion` from 35 to 36 in the `gradle.properties` files for the `ExpensifyNitroUtils`, `hybrid-app`, and `background-task` Android modules. Companion to the Mobile-Expensify PR that bumps the main app target SDK to meet Google Play's API 36 requirement.

MOBILE-EXPENSIFY: https://github.com/Expensify/Mobile-Expensify/pull/14025

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/662541
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A — no behavior change.

QA Steps

[No QA] - Build config only. No user-facing behavior changes.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like `Avatar`, I verified the components using `Avatar` are working as expected)
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that: [N/A]
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified: [N/A]
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages: [N/A]
  • If the PR modifies a generic component: [N/A]
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories: [N/A]
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink: [N/A]
  • If the PR modifies the UI: [N/A]
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow. [N/A - build config]
  • If the `main` branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the `Test` steps.

Screenshots/Videos

N/A — no UI changes.

@marcaaron marcaaron self-assigned this Jul 22, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 roryabraham has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No regressions found

@marcaaron
marcaaron marked this pull request as ready for review July 27, 2026 21:40
@marcaaron
marcaaron requested a review from a team as a code owner July 27, 2026 21:40
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested a review from thesahindia July 27, 2026 21:40
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@thesahindia Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team July 27, 2026 21:40
@marcaaron
marcaaron requested review from a team and removed request for thesahindia July 27, 2026 21:41
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from marufsharifi and removed request for a team July 27, 2026 21:41
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@marufsharifi Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@marcaaron
marcaaron removed the request for review from marufsharifi July 27, 2026 21:41
@marcaaron
marcaaron merged commit 7f24969 into main Jul 27, 2026
32 checks passed
@marcaaron
marcaaron deleted the marcaaron-target-api-36 branch July 27, 2026 21:47
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 marcaaron has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 9.4.46-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@izarutskaya

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@marcaaron Can I check it off the list?

@marcaaron

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@izarutskaya yes go for it!

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 9.4.46-10 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants