Skip to content

Update the policy taxes table to the new style - #94208

Merged
rlinoz merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
cmartins-taxTable
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

rlinoz merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
cmartins-taxTable

Conversation

@luacmartins

@luacmartins luacmartins commented Jun 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Migrate the policy taxes page to the shared Table component.

Fixed Issues

$ #86208

Tests

  1. Open a workspace Taxes page with tax rates configured
  2. Confirm name, rate value/default label, and enabled switch render
  3. Tap a row → tax edit page opens
  4. Select multiple rates and confirm bulk delete/enable/disable still work
  5. With 12+ rates, confirm search and sorting work
  6. Confirm Add rate, Settings, and accounting import banner still work
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
Screen.Recording.2026-06-22.at.3.28.54.PM.mov
Screenshot 2026-06-22 at 3 26 37 PM

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Extract taxes table row and table wrapper using the shared Table component pattern.
Replace SelectionListWithModal with the shared Table component while preserving bulk actions, search, and row interactions.
@luacmartins
luacmartins requested review from a team as code owners June 22, 2026 18:38
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from Krishna2323, joekaufmanexpensify and situchan and removed request for a team June 22, 2026 18:38
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Krishna2323 @situchan One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team June 22, 2026 18:38

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 683227a349

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/CONST/index.ts 93.84% <ø> (ø)
src/components/SearchBar.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/Table/TableHeader.tsx 95.52% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
src/components/Table/TableSearchBar.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/Switch.tsx 94.11% <50.00%> (-5.89%) ⬇️
src/components/Table/middlewares/selection.ts 53.22% <0.00%> (-1.78%) ⬇️
src/components/Table/TableRow.tsx 71.23% <0.00%> (-10.02%) ⬇️
...les/WorkspaceTaxesTable/WorkspaceTaxesTableRow.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/workspace/taxes/WorkspaceTaxesPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...rc/components/Tables/WorkspaceTaxesTable/index.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 20 files with indirect coverage changes

@luacmartins
luacmartins marked this pull request as draft June 22, 2026 19:30
@luacmartins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This is not ready for review yet

Skip mobile row-tap selection when item.disabled is true, matching checkbox behavior and preserving the default tax rate guard.
@luacmartins
luacmartins marked this pull request as ready for review June 22, 2026 21:29
@luacmartins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ready for review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2e4629165c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/components/Tables/WorkspaceTaxesTable/WorkspaceTaxesTableRow.tsx Outdated
@Krishna2323

Krishna2323 commented Jun 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • When items are removed from the list optimistically, the last item does not show the bottom border radius.
image
  • Search input focus is lost when using the toggle
input_focus_lost.mp4
  • Select cursor is shown instead of disabled cursor when no items can be selected
cursor_select_shown.mp4

Comment thread src/pages/workspace/taxes/WorkspaceTaxesPage.tsx
Match the Categories page pattern by excluding optimistically deleted
rates while online so the last visible row keeps its bottom border radius.
Show the disabled cursor instead of the pointer when every row is locked
or otherwise unselectable.
Prevent mousedown from moving focus off the search input and restore it
after table data updates, matching the SelectionList focus behavior.
@luacmartins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

When items are removed from the list optimistically, the last item does not show the bottom border radius.

Screen.Recording.2026-06-23.at.12.46.13.PM.mov

Search input focus is lost when using the toggle

Screen.Recording.2026-06-23.at.12.45.47.PM.mov

Select cursor is shown instead of disabled cursor when no items can be selected

Screen.Recording.2026-06-23.at.12.47.32.PM.mov

@luacmartins
luacmartins requested a review from Krishna2323 June 23, 2026 18:48
@luacmartins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Krishna2323 fixed

@joekaufmanexpensify joekaufmanexpensify left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good for product

@Krishna2323

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
android_hybrid.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
andorid_mWeb.mp4
iOS: HybridApp
ios_hybrid.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_mWeb.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web_chrome.mp4

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested a review from rlinoz June 24, 2026 08:18
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rlinoz Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@rlinoz
rlinoz merged commit 619d885 into main Jun 24, 2026
38 of 40 checks passed
@rlinoz
rlinoz deleted the cmartins-taxTable branch June 24, 2026 13:11
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 rlinoz has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify OSBotify mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2026
69 tasks done
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/rlinoz in version: 9.4.19-1 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 I reviewed the changes in this PR against the help site files under docs/articles.

No help site changes are required.

This PR migrates the workspace Taxes page to the shared Table component — a visual/structural refactor. The user-facing behavior is unchanged: tax rates still render with name, rate/default label, and an enabled switch; rows still open the tax edit page; bulk delete/enable/disable, search, sorting, Add rate, Settings, and the accounting import banner all behave as before.

The relevant help articles (Learn about Tracking Taxes, Track taxes) describe how tax tracking works and how to configure tax rates conceptually — none of that documented behavior changes here, so the docs remain accurate.

@luacmartins, no help site PR was created since no documentation updates are needed. Please confirm this assessment reflects the current behavior — if you'd like docs changes anyway, let me know and I'll open a draft PR.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/blimpich in version: 9.4.19-5 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants