Skip to content

[CP Staging] fix: prevent focus-return side effects on confirmation-field save and SelectionList RHP close - #90869

Merged
MonilBhavsar merged 9 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
TaduJR:fix-Keyboard-Navigation-Many-Pages-The-focus-is-lost-and-does-not-return-to-triggering-element
May 18, 2026
Merged

MonilBhavsar merged 9 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
TaduJR:fix-Keyboard-Navigation-Many-Pages-The-focus-is-lost-and-does-not-return-to-triggering-element

Conversation

@TaduJR

@TaduJR TaduJR commented May 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

#87852 restores keyboard focus to the element you came from on back navigation. That programmatic .focus() is the right thing for accessibility, but three places were mistaking it for the user actually navigating there by keyboard — three deploy blockers, one root cause.

To tell a real focus from the restore, NavigationFocusReturn now exposes isFocusRestoreInProgress(), true only for the synchronous moment restoreTriggerForRoute calls .focus(). Lists check it in their onFocus handlers.

#90838 — Merchant: pressing Enter again re-opens Merchant instead of creating the expense.
Saving the field with Enter returns to the confirm page and focus lands back on the Merchant row. Because that row is a button, Button.shouldDisableEnterShortcut switches off the page's "Create expense" Enter shortcut, so the next Enter just re-opens Merchant. Fix: a one-shot skipNextFocusRestore() that the merchant screen sets right before its save-and-go-back. Back and Esc don't set it, so normal dismissals still restore focus (WCAG intact).

#90839 — Categories: the list scroll-jumps after closing the details RHP.
The restored row's onFocus moved the SelectionList's arrow cursor, which scrolled the list to it. Fix: on a focus-return restore the cursor still tracks the restored row (so keyboard nav continues from the right place), but the scroll that move would trigger is suppressed.

#90845 — Spend: the expense stays highlighted after closing the RHP.
Same onFocus path in the Search list, where the cursor is the row highlight — so the opened expense stayed lit up and scrolled into view. Fix: the Search list ignores the restore for cursor purposes; focus is still restored for screen readers, it just doesn't paint the keyboard highlight.

Fixed Issues

$ #90838
$ #90839
$ #90845
PROPOSAL:

Tests

[#90838] Confirmation field save → Enter creates the expense

  1. Open a DM with any user.
  2. Click + > Create expense > Manual.
  3. Enter an amount, click Next.
  4. On the confirm page, click Merchant.
  5. Type a merchant and press Enter (saves, returns to the confirm page).
  6. Press Enter again → the expense is created (you land back on the report); Merchant does not re-open.

[#90839] Category details RHP close → no scroll jump

  1. Go to workspace settings > Categories.
  2. Click the Advertising category (RHP opens).
  3. Click the RHP back button.
  4. The category list does not scroll (stays at the top) and focus returns to the Advertising row.

[#90845] Spend expense RHP close → row not highlighted

  1. Create 2–3 expenses, go to the Spend page (Expenses).
  2. Press Enter / click an expense to open it (RHP opens).
  3. Click the RHP back button.
  4. The expense row is not highlighted and the list does not scroll to it; focus is still restored to the row for screen readers.

All steps verified on web (dev); the three blockers are fixed with no regression to focus-return, keyboard arrow/Tab navigation, or mouse interaction.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."
Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Mac-Chrome.mp4

@TaduJR
TaduJR requested review from a team as code owners May 16, 2026 08:35
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from heyjennahay and shubham1206agra and removed request for a team May 16, 2026 08:35
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented May 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@shubham1206agra Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@TaduJR

TaduJR commented May 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

cc @mkhutornyi

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ec1506c27a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/components/SelectionList/ListItem/ListItemRenderer.tsx Outdated
@codecov

codecov Bot commented May 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/components/SelectionList/BaseSelectionList.tsx 67.07% <100.00%> (+0.68%) ⬆️
src/libs/NavigationFocusReturn.ts 95.00% <100.00%> (+0.30%) ⬆️
.../pages/iou/request/step/IOURequestStepMerchant.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ponents/Search/SearchList/BaseSearchList/index.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ListWithSections/BaseSelectionListWithSections.tsx 83.67% <50.00%> (-0.36%) ⬇️
src/libs/NavigationFocusReturn.native.ts 20.00% <0.00%> (-8.58%) ⬇️
... and 25 files with indirect coverage changes

@mkhutornyi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@TaduJR #90845 is related to our PR. Confirmed not reproducible after revert

@TaduJR

TaduJR commented May 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@TaduJR #90845 is related to our PR. Confirmed not reproducible after revert

Hmm. Let me take a look.

@TaduJR

TaduJR commented May 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mkhutornyi

Double checked it, and addressed it.

Thanks!

@mkhutornyi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@codex review

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Review

Overall: This is a clean, well-structured fix for three deploy blockers sharing one root cause. The approach of exposing isFocusRestoreInProgress() as a synchronous flag and skipNextFocusRestore() as a one-shot opt-out is sound. Tests are thorough.

What's good

  • isRestoringFocus is safe — the try/finally block guarantees the flag resets even if .focus() throws.
  • skipNextRestore is properly one-shot — consumed on backward, cleared on forward and lateral, and reset in teardown + resetForTests. No leak risk.
  • SelectionList cursor still syncssetFocusedIndexFromRowFocus updates focusedIndex but suppresses the scroll via the existing suppressNextFocusScrollRef. Keyboard arrow-key nav continues from the restored row. Good design.
  • Codex P2 is a false positiveisFocusRestoreInProgress() is a synchronous flag that's only true during the actual .focus() call inside restoreTriggerForRoute, not based on sourceCapabilities. Genuine keyboard Tab focus will never see this flag as true.

One design question (non-blocking)

BaseSearchList does a full early return during focus restore (no focusedIndex update), while BaseSelectionList updates the index but suppresses scroll. This means after navigating back to a search list, arrow-key navigation starts from the old position rather than the restored row. The comment says this is intentional (screen-reader-only restore) — just confirming that's the desired UX?

Minor test coverage note (non-blocking)

No test verifies isFocusRestoreInProgress() resets to false if .focus() throws. The try/finally makes this obviously correct, but a one-liner test would document the contract:

jest.spyOn(trigger, 'focus').mockImplementation(() => { throw new Error('boom'); });
expect(() => restoreTriggerForRoute('route-a')).toThrow();
expect(isFocusRestoreInProgress()).toBe(false);

No blocking issues found. The fix is minimal, well-tested, and correctly addresses all three deploy blockers.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@mkhutornyi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
mweb.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov

@mkhutornyi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Blue frame shows when close RHP using Esc key. This doesn't happen on production.
Seems only happening on Expenses tab. Not reproducible on Reports/Drafts

blue.frame.mov

@mkhutornyi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot investigate this.

Repro step:

  1. Go to Spend > Expenses
  2. Click any row
  3. Press Esc key
  4. Blue border shows on selected row

Why doesn't this happen on other tabs like Spend > Reports, Spend > Drafts, etc but only Spend > Expenses tab?

blue

@mkhutornyi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I reviewed that. It's safe minor refactor. @MelvinBot double confirm

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I reviewed commit aad6e6ae33d0 and can confirm it's a safe, behavior-preserving refactor. Here's the breakdown:

What it does: Extracts the duplicated "set focused index + suppress scroll" pattern into a shared helper setFocusedIndexWithoutScrollOnChange, then calls it from both setFocusedIndexFromRowFocus and the onSelectRow handler.

Why it's safe:

  • setFocusedIndexFromRowFocus — previously inlined if (isFocusRestoreInProgress() && index !== focusedIndex) to guard the scroll suppression. The refactored version delegates the index !== focusedIndex check to the new helper and keeps the isFocusRestoreInProgress() gate itself. The else branch now explicitly calls setFocusedIndex(index) — same as before, since the old code fell through to setFocusedIndex(index) unconditionally.
  • onSelectRow handler — previously had if (indexToFocus !== focusedIndex) { suppressNextFocusScrollRef.current = true; } setFocusedIndex(indexToFocus); — this is exactly what setFocusedIndexWithoutScrollOnChange does.

No logic changes, no new behavior paths, single file touched. Confirmed safe. 👍

@MonilBhavsar MonilBhavsar changed the title fix: prevent focus-return side effects on confirmation-field save and SelectionList RHP close [CP Staging] fix: prevent focus-return side effects on confirmation-field save and SelectionList RHP close May 18, 2026

@Beamanator Beamanator left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looking pretty good here!

@MonilBhavsar
MonilBhavsar merged commit 161d0ba into Expensify:main May 18, 2026
52 checks passed
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @MonilBhavsar has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2026
…ges-The-focus-is-lost-and-does-not-return-to-triggering-element

[CP Staging] fix: prevent focus-return side effects on confirmation-field save and SelectionList RHP close

(cherry picked from commit 161d0ba)

(cherry-picked to staging by roryabraham)
@OSBotify OSBotify added the CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging label May 18, 2026
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.3.75-7 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No help site changes are required for this PR.

The changes are purely internal UI bug fixes for keyboard focus-return behavior (preventing scroll jumps, row highlights, and Enter key conflicts after back navigation). No user-facing features, workflows, settings, or terminology are affected.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.3.75-10 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No help site changes are required for this PR.

This PR fixes internal keyboard focus/scroll side effects (NavigationFocusReturn, BaseSelectionList, BaseSearchList) — it doesn't change any user-facing features, workflows, settings, labels, or terminology that the help site documents.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.3.75-14 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.3.76-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I reviewed all the changes in this PR. The modifications are purely internal bug fixes to keyboard focus-return behavior across NavigationFocusReturn, BaseSelectionList, BaseSearchList, and IOURequestStepMerchant. They fix three deploy blockers (#90838, #90839, #90845) related to:

  • Focus restoration causing the Merchant field to re-open on Enter
  • Scroll-jumping when closing the category details RHP
  • Expense row staying highlighted after closing the Spend RHP

None of these changes affect user-facing features, workflows, settings names, or terminology that would be documented in the help site.

No changes are required to Expensify's help site files under App/docs/articles.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.3.77-3 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants