Skip to content

Force charts to fallback to currency code if symbol is not supported by font - #81550

Merged
blimpich merged 12 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:do-not-render-unsupported-currency-symbols-in-charts
Feb 17, 2026
Merged

blimpich merged 12 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:do-not-render-unsupported-currency-symbols-in-charts

Conversation

@mateuuszzzzz

@mateuuszzzzz mateuuszzzzz commented Feb 5, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

  1. Currency symbol fallback (original fix)
  • Added YAxisUnit type that supports objects with {value, fallback}
  • When the chart font cannot render the currency symbol (detected via font.getGlyphIDs()), it
    falls back to the 3-letter currency code (e.g., "₹" → "INR")
  • This is a temporary solution until we properly support rendering all currency symbols in the
    chart font in the future

Other changes:

  1. Made currency display reactive to locale changes
  • Previously, getCurrencyDisplayInfoForCharts read locale directly from
    IntlStore.getCurrentLocale(), which was not reactive
  • Now we use preferredLocale from useLocalize() hook, so charts will re-render when user changes
    language settings
  • Currency symbol and position (left/right) are now correctly updated based on the app's
    preferred locale
  1. Small refactor
  • Moved currency display logic from CurrencyUtils.ts directly into SearchChartView.tsx
  • The helper function getCurrencyDisplayInfoForCharts was only used in one place, so extracting
    it to a shared utility was overkill
  • Manual memoization was removed in some places. Since the initial version of the charts code was created before we had clear guidelines for writing code with the React compiler, there are still areas with manual memoization. It’s a good idea to remove it gradually as we continue making further improvements.

Fixed Issues

$ #81112
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Test unsupported currency symbol (INR)
    • Create expenses with Indian Rupee (INR) currency
    • Open search chart view
    • Verify Y-axis labels display "INR" instead of ₹
    • Tap on a bar and verify tooltip also displays "INR"
  2. Test supported currency symbol (USD)
    - Create expenses with US Dollar (USD) currency
    - Open search chart view
    - Verify Y-axis labels display "$"
    - Tap on a bar and verify tooltip also displays "$"
  3. Test Y-axis and tooltip consistency
    - For both INR and USD, verify the currency unit shown in tooltip matches the Y-axis

Offline tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native Screenshot 2026-02-12 at 11 37 56
Android: mWeb Chrome Screenshot 2026-02-12 at 11 00 04
iOS: Native Screenshot 2026-02-12 at 10 41 47
iOS: mWeb Safari Screenshot 2026-02-12 at 10 42 48
MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2026-02-12 at 10 15 07

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Feb 5, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/components/Charts/BarChart/BarChartContent.tsx 5.40% <ø> (ø)
...c/components/Charts/LineChart/LineChartContent.tsx 9.09% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/CurrencyUtils.ts 94.91% <ø> (+11.33%) ⬆️
...rc/components/Charts/hooks/useChartLabelFormats.ts 77.77% <76.47%> (+77.77%) ⬆️
src/components/Search/SearchBarChart.tsx 12.50% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/Search/SearchLineChart.tsx 12.50% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/Charts/hooks/useTooltipData.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/Search/SearchChartView.tsx 6.38% <0.00%> (-0.44%) ⬇️
... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

@mateuuszzzzz
mateuuszzzzz force-pushed the do-not-render-unsupported-currency-symbols-in-charts branch from a66bcff to 59e9ed4 Compare February 9, 2026 07:27
@mateuuszzzzz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Let's merge #81543 first

@mhawryluk mhawryluk left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome! 📈

Comment thread src/components/Charts/hooks/useChartLabelFormats.ts Outdated
Comment thread src/components/Search/SearchChartView.tsx Outdated
@mateuuszzzzz
mateuuszzzzz marked this pull request as ready for review February 12, 2026 11:50
@mateuuszzzzz
mateuuszzzzz requested review from a team as code owners February 12, 2026 11:50
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from jjcoffee and trjExpensify and removed request for a team February 12, 2026 11:50
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jjcoffee Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team February 12, 2026 11:50
@trjExpensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Switching in @ShridharGoel to review as the C+ on this project.

@trjExpensify
trjExpensify requested review from ShridharGoel and removed request for jjcoffee February 12, 2026 14:20
trjExpensify
trjExpensify previously approved these changes Feb 12, 2026

@trjExpensify trjExpensify left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Insights project PR 👍

@ShridharGoel ShridharGoel left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add tests covering these?

  • unsupported symbol fallback to currency code
  • supported symbol keeps symbol
  • locale change updates unit/position in chart labels

Comment thread src/components/Charts/hooks/useTooltipData.ts
@mateuuszzzzz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ShridharGoel I think you can re-review


mockNumberFormat = (n: number) => n.toLocaleString('de-DE');
rerender({unit: {value: '€', fallback: 'EUR'}, position: 'right'});
expect(result.current.formatYAxisLabel(1000)).toBe('1.000€');

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But in the chart, it displays as €1,000. Is that expected?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, in European countries it is common to have currency symbol on the right so if you switch to e.g. German language in the app you will see it.

Screenshot 2026-02-17 at 09 28 23

@ShridharGoel

ShridharGoel commented Feb 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp Screenshot 2026-02-17 at 2 05 21 PM
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2026-02-16 at 7 30 20 PM

@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #81112 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested a review from blimpich February 17, 2026 08:36
@blimpich
blimpich merged commit f29220e into Expensify:main Feb 17, 2026
30 checks passed
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @blimpich has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify OSBotify mentioned this pull request Feb 17, 2026
93 tasks done
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/blimpich in version: 9.3.21-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.21-4 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants