Refactored ConfirmModal usage to useConfirmModal

[abbasifaizan70]

Explanation of Change

This PR refactored ConfirmModal usage to useConfirmModal in the following files:

PopoverReportActionContextMenu.tsx
TravelTerms.tsx
RoomMemberDetailsPage.tsx
ReportParticipantDetailsPage.tsx
EditReportFieldPage.tsx

Fixed Issues

$ #76695
PROPOSAL: #76695 (comment)

Tests

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PopoverReportActionContextMenu - Delete Comment

1. Right-click any message → Select "Delete"
2. Modal appears with "Delete comment" title and red Delete button
3. Click "Delete" → Message deleted
4. Click "Cancel" → Modal closes, message stays
5. Test: ESC closes, Enter deletes

---

TravelTerms - Verify Company Modal

1. Settings → Travel → Accept terms
2. If verification error occurs → Modal appears
3. Modal shows rocket image, "Verify your company" title
4. Click confirm → Creates concierge message
5. Note: Hard to trigger, backend-dependent

---

RoomMemberDetailsPage - Remove Room Member

1. Open workspace room → Members → Click member name
2. Click "Remove from room" button
3. Modal: "Remove from room" with member name
4. Click "Remove" → Member removed
5. Click "Cancel" → Modal closes
6. Test: Button disabled for yourself/owner/admin

---

ReportParticipantDetailsPage - Remove Group Member

1. Open group chat (3+ people) → Members → Click member
2. Click "Remove from group" (admin only)
3. Modal: "Remove from group" with member name
4. Click "Remove" → Member removed
5. Click "Cancel" → Modal closes
6. Test: Button disabled for yourself, hidden for non-admins

---

EditReportFieldPage - Delete Report Field

1. Open expense report → Report Details
2. Scroll to "Report fields" → Click custom field (e.g., "13" or "Project")
3. Click three-dot menu (⋮) → Select "Delete"
4. Modal: "Delete" with confirmation prompt
5. Click "Delete" → Field deleted after 200ms, navigates back
6. Click "Cancel" → Modal closes
7. Note: Three-dot menu only shows for deletable fields (not Title)

Offline tests

same as tests.

QA Steps

same as tests.

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
  • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
  • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

PopoverReportActionContextMenu.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.1.32.58.AM.mov

---

RoomMemberDetailsPage.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.1.38.17.AM.mov

---

ReportParticipantDetailsPage.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.1.42.38.AM.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

PopoverReportActionContextMenu.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.1.48.28.AM.mov

---

RoomMemberDetailsPage.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.1.49.34.AM.mov

---

ReportParticipantDetailsPage.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.1.50.01.AM.mov

iOS: Native

PopoverReportActionContextMenu.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.2.00.23.AM.mov

---

RoomMemberDetailsPage.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.2.00.42.AM.mov

---

ReportParticipantDetailsPage.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.2.01.07.AM.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

PopoverReportActionContextMenu.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.2.19.45.AM.mov

---

RoomMemberDetailsPage.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.2.20.55.AM.mov

---

ReportParticipantDetailsPage.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.2.21.29.AM.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

PopoverReportActionContextMenu.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.12.48.05.AM.mov

---

TravelTerms.tsx

---

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.5.49.27.PM.mov

---

RoomMemberDetailsPage.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.12.57.48.AM.mov

---

ReportParticipantDetailsPage.tsx

Screen.Recording.2026-01-16.at.12.58.30.AM.mov

---

EditReportFieldPage.tsx

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/pages/Travel/TravelTerms.tsx	0.00%	29 Missing ⚠️
src/pages/EditReportFieldPage.tsx	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/pages/EditReportFieldPage.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/Travel/TravelTerms.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[melvin-bot]

@ZhenjaHorbach Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[melvin-bot]

@roryabraham Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[abbasifaizan70]

@ZhenjaHorbach The PR is ready for review for the remaining modals.

[roryabraham]

conflicts

[abbasifaizan70]

@roryabraham please have a look.

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.3.11-19 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎	cancelled 🔪

[jponikarchuk]

@abbasifaizan70 @ZhenjaHorbach Could you please provide more steps on how to trigger the modal for these tests?

• TravelTerms - Verify Company Modal
• EditReportFieldPage - Delete Report Field

[abbasifaizan70]

@abbasifaizan70 @ZhenjaHorbach Could you please provide more steps on how to trigger the modal for these tests?

• TravelTerms - Verify Company Modal
• EditReportFieldPage - Delete Report Field

@jponikarchuk You can modify the AcceptSpotnanaTerms response for testing using Chrome Dev Tools to test TravelTerms.
https://blog.logrocket.com/chrome-devtools-api-mocking/

{
    "code": 666,
    "jsonCode": 666,
    "type": "Expensify\\Error\\SpotnanaError",
    "UUID": "F2DA6AD0-0A44-4EAF-9C76-6C2E61625C8F",
    "message": "Please contact your Account manager or sales@expensify.com to get a demo of travel and have it enabled for your company.",
    "title": "",
    "data": {
        "onyxData": [
            {
                "onyxMethod": "merge",
                "key": "travelProvisioning",
                "value": {
                    "error": "additionalVerificationRequired"
                }
            }
        ]
    },
    "htmlMessage": "",
    "onyxData": [
        {
            "onyxMethod": "merge",
            "key": "travelProvisioning",
            "value": {
                "error": "additionalVerificationRequired"
            }
        }
    ],
    "requestID": "9c476148db114c6b-SJC"
}

For EditReportFieldPage i did a manual change locally to test this modal.

@ZhenjaHorbach, if you have more ways to test, then let her know. Thanks.

[jponikarchuk]

Thanks @abbasifaizan70, Verify Company Modal works fine
@ZhenjaHorbach We still need your help, how can we get Delete Field modal for EditReportFieldPage - Delete Report Field test? Could you please provide more steps in precondition, we are not able to find it

bandicam.2026-02-03.20-56-24-314.mp4

[ZhenjaHorbach]

Thanks @abbasifaizan70, Verify Company Modal works fine @ZhenjaHorbach We still need your help, how can we get Delete Field modal for EditReportFieldPage - Delete Report Field test? Could you please provide more steps in precondition, we are not able to find it

bandicam.2026-02-03.20-56-24-314.mp4

Unfortunately, I also used mocks

[m-natarajan]

@abbasifaizan70 @ZhenjaHorbach @roryabraham QA team unable to get the delete field modal, Can this one please be tested internally, The workaround suggested didn't give expected result.

[abbasifaizan70]

I also used mocks

I also used mocks to test it locally.

[Julesssss]

@abbasifaizan70 @ZhenjaHorbach @roryabraham QA team unable to get the delete field modal, Can this one please be tested internally, The workaround suggested didn't give expected result.

@roryabraham I'm not blocking on this as the issues appears to be perf improvement. But can you check out @m-natarajan's comment please

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.3.12-1 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	failure ❌