Skip to content

Call MoveIOUToPolicy even when policy expense chat is not loaded - #69788

Merged
Valforte merged 33 commits into
mainfrom
georgia-moveiou-fix
Sep 26, 2025
Merged

Valforte merged 33 commits into
mainfrom
georgia-moveiou-fix

Conversation

@grgia

@grgia grgia commented Sep 3, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Screen.Recording.2025-09-15.at.3.11.37.PM.mov

We cannot guarantee that an admin will have the policy expense chat IDs for members in ONYX at any given time.

Therefore we are:

  • Rather than basing this button on policy expense chat, check for policy membership instead.
  • preexistingReportID is returned from BE in MoveIOUToExistingPolicy if the policy expense chat is not passed
  • Pass down the optimistic reportID

To keep things clean, in the next PR we will handle the offline optimistic data. From my testing, there may be one more BE fix to merge, so let's merge this and handle the offline opening of the report in a follow up. The app will simply not open the report optimistically if it is not loaded.

  • Optimistically create a report, populate it the expense, then allow the preexisting report middleware to clean up with the correct report

Fixed Issues

$ #68027
PROPOSAL:

Tests

See QA

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  • Create 2 Accounts. Both with USD as default.
  • 1 Account as an admin with a policy which has bank account added to Policy. This will be the PAYER
  • 1 Account as an employee B. This will be the EMPLOYEE/REQUESTOR

First: Test Move IOU and invite

  • From B/EMPLOYEE:

  • send a DM to A/PAYER

  • In the DM chat, create a USD

  • From A/PAYER:

  • Click on the dropdown in the payment button, click "pay via workspace"

  • [X]✅ Verify that a policy Expense chat is created and expense is moved

Second: Test Move IOU with Expense chat loaded

  • DO NOT LOG OUT FROM A/PAYER FOR THIS TEST

  • From B/EMPLOYEE:

  • send a second USD money request to A/PAYER

  • From A/PAYER:

  • Click on the dropdown in the payment button, click "pay via workspace"

  • [X]✅ Verify that expense is moved to existing policy expense chat

Third: Test Move IOU with Expense chat loaded

  • From B/EMPLOYEE:

  • send a third USD money request to A/PAYER

  • From A/PAYER:

  • Go to settings > troubleshoot > clear cache and restart

  • Click on the dropdown in the payment button, click "pay via workspace"

  • ✅ Verify that "moved this report to workspace" is commented, but user is not navigated.

  • ✅ Verify that clicking on " workspace" opens the policy expense chat

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

@grgia grgia self-assigned this Sep 3, 2025
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @grgia has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @grgia has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@grgia grgia changed the title Georgia moveiou fix Call MoveIOUToPolicy even when policy expense chat is not loaded Sep 3, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @grgia has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

Comment thread src/libs/actions/Report.ts Outdated
Comment on lines +5194 to +5204
optimisticData.push({
onyxMethod: Onyx.METHOD.SET,
key: `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT}${optimisticExpenseChatReportID}`,
value: {
reportID: optimisticExpenseChatReportID,
policyID,
ownerAccountID: employeeAccountID,
type: CONST.REPORT.TYPE.CHAT,
chatType: CONST.REPORT.CHAT_TYPE.POLICY_EXPENSE_CHAT,
},
});

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will remove the optimistic updates for now as the BE requires an update. I will instead break this into 2 PRs as described

Comment thread src/components/KYCWall/BaseKYCWall.tsx Outdated
Comment on lines +127 to +134
const isMember = isPolicyMember(policy, getLoginByAccountID(iouReport.ownerAccountID ?? CONST.DEFAULT_NUMBER_ID));
if (!isMember) {
const {policyExpenseChatReportID: newPolicyExpenseChatReportID} = moveIOUReportToPolicyAndInviteSubmitter(iouReport.reportID, policy.id, formatPhoneNumber) ?? {};
savePreferredPaymentMethod(iouReport.policyID, policy.id, CONST.LAST_PAYMENT_METHOD.IOU, lastPaymentMethod?.[policy.id]);
Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.REPORT_WITH_ID.getRoute(newPolicyExpenseChatReportID));
if (newPolicyExpenseChatReportID) {
Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.REPORT_WITH_ID.getRoute(newPolicyExpenseChatReportID));
}
} else {
moveIOUReportToPolicy(iouReport.reportID, policy.id, true);
const {policyExpenseChatReportID, useTemporaryOptimisticExpenseChatReportID} = moveIOUReportToPolicy(iouReport, policy, true) ?? {};

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is the main change

Comment on lines +5184 to +5185
const useTemporaryOptimisticExpenseChatReportID = !expenseChatReportId;
const optimisticExpenseChatReportID = expenseChatReportId ?? generateReportID();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as with this default to an optimisticID

@hungvu193

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@getusha Could you review this PR while I'm working on bulk pay?

@joekaufmanexpensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LMK when this is ready to test and I will do that 👍

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @grgia has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @grgia has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@joekaufmanexpensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Let us know your thoughts @getusha

@grgia

grgia commented Sep 23, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@getusha or @hungvu193 this PR needs final review if you're available

@getusha

getusha commented Sep 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewing

@getusha

getusha commented Sep 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks completely unrelated but only able to reproduce this on this branch, extra space on top.

Screenshot 2025-09-24 at 3 14 40 in the afternoon

@grgia

grgia commented Sep 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@getusha yeah I can merge main if needed, but no styles are updated here

@getusha

getusha commented Sep 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
android-rec-45.webm
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-rec-42.webm
iOS: HybridApp
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.-.2025-09-25.at.14.33.03.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.-.2025-09-25.at.14.04.59.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-09-24.at.3.56.46.in.the.afternoon.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-09-25.at.2.29.49.in.the.afternoon.mov

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested a review from MarioExpensify September 25, 2025 12:57
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@MarioExpensify Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Valforte
Valforte previously approved these changes Sep 25, 2025

@Valforte Valforte left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@grgia
grgia dismissed stale reviews from Valforte and joekaufmanexpensify via 17bca9f September 25, 2025 16:16
@grgia
grgia requested a review from Valforte September 25, 2025 16:17
@grgia

grgia commented Sep 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Valforte fixed conflicts

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 25, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 10.52632% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/components/KYCWall/BaseKYCWall.tsx 0.00% 12 Missing ⚠️
src/pages/ReportChangeWorkspacePage.tsx 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Valforte
Valforte previously approved these changes Sep 25, 2025
@Valforte

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There is this ESLint error now

/home/runner/work/App/App/src/components/KYCWall/BaseKYCWall.tsx
Warning:   160:9  warning  React Hook useCallback has unnecessary dependencies: 'onSuccessfulKYC', 'source', and 'walletTerms.source'. Either exclude them or remove the dependency array  react-hooks/exhaustive-deps

@joekaufmanexpensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks like all checks passing now. Could you re-review @Valforte ?

@Valforte
Valforte merged commit 7b004f4 into main Sep 26, 2025
25 checks passed
@Valforte
Valforte deleted the georgia-moveiou-fix branch September 26, 2025 14:47
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify OSBotify mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2025
62 tasks done
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Valforte in version: 9.2.19-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.2.19-3 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants