Skip to content

fix: Onfido broken styles - #64449

Merged
youssef-lr merged 8 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
mkzie2:mkzie2-issue/63691
Jul 16, 2025
Merged

youssef-lr merged 8 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
mkzie2:mkzie2-issue/63691

Conversation

@mkzie2

@mkzie2 mkzie2 commented Jun 18, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #63961
PROPOSAL: #63961 (comment)

Tests

  1. Go to workspace settings > Workflows > Connect bank account
  2. Start to add bank account until you reach Onfido step
  3. Verify there's no outer white border around the Onfido section (the horizontal or rounded border are expected for now)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

NA

QA Steps

  1. Go to workspace settings > Workflows > Connect bank account
  2. Start to add bank account until you reach Onfido step
  3. Verify there's no outer white border around the Onfido section (the horizontal or rounded border are expected for now)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-06-19.at.01.05.26-compressed.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-06-19.at.00.57.33.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-06-19.at.00.56.02-compressed.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-06-19.at.00.51.53.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-06-19.at.00.53.05-compressed.mov

@mkzie2
mkzie2 marked this pull request as ready for review June 18, 2025 17:58
@mkzie2
mkzie2 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 18, 2025 17:58
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested a review from ZhenjaHorbach June 18, 2025 17:58
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ZhenjaHorbach Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team June 18, 2025 17:58
@ZhenjaHorbach

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jun 19, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp

NA

Android: mWeb Chrome
2025-07-08.16.22.07.mov
iOS: HybridApp

NA

iOS: mWeb Safari
2025-07-08.16.28.20.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
2025-07-08.16.11.04.mov
MacOS: Desktop
2025-07-08.16.11.04.mov

@ZhenjaHorbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks like we still have some style issues

2025-06-19.12.29.59.mov

@ZhenjaHorbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
2025-06-19.12.33.06.mov

@mkzie2

mkzie2 commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ZhenjaHorbach As mentioned my in proposal, that's an embedded iframe that we cannot control. Normally Onfido will allow customization via the onfido-sdk-ui here. But I have checked carefully all their releases and did not find a way to remove that horizontal line and rounded border.

@ZhenjaHorbach

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jun 19, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ZhenjaHorbach As mentioned my in proposal, that's an embedded iframe that we cannot control. Normally Onfido will allow customization via the onfido-sdk-ui here. But I have checked carefully all their releases and did not find a way to remove that horizontal line and rounded border.

Oh
Yeah
Sorry 😅
Forgot about it

But we still have a border button issue

@ZhenjaHorbach

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jun 19, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

And let's update QA steps to mention that horizontal line and rounded border are expected

@mkzie2

mkzie2 commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ZhenjaHorbach Updated.

@ZhenjaHorbach

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jun 19, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ZhenjaHorbach Updated.

Thanks !
But what about a border button issue ?

@mkzie2

mkzie2 commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ZhenjaHorbach You meant the button border, right?

@ZhenjaHorbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ZhenjaHorbach You meant the button border, right?

Oh
Yes 😅
It's time to sleep

@ZhenjaHorbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mkzie2
Any updates ?

@mkzie2

mkzie2 commented Jun 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I cannot reproduce it:

Screen.Recording.2025-06-26.at.20.25.52.mov

@ZhenjaHorbach

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jun 30, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Strange
What browser are you using?
For example, I use chrome

@mkzie2

mkzie2 commented Jul 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I used Chrome too:

Screen.Recording.2025-07-01.at.16.48.35.mov

It's supposed not to have the border because I already set to transparent:

https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/64449/files#diff-f31e818e33c110885f770bff9de21182174fb7383ce4e3d421117a15e1b9ad2aR57

@ZhenjaHorbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Okay
I will retest today or tomorrow !

@ZhenjaHorbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mkzie2
Could you update a branch to the latest version of main ?

@mkzie2

mkzie2 commented Jul 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Done.

@ZhenjaHorbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Actually yes
When I try to hover over a button
I don't see button border updates anymore

But we have a weird border when we try to select buttons using the keyboard
And if we hold down the button

2025-07-08.16.00.48.mov

@Expensify/design
Could you clarify this please?
I'm not sure if this is expected

@shawnborton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Given that these styles come from Onfido, I'm actually not sure how much customization we can do. Can someone tell us what exactly we have control over and we can provide guidance from there?

@mkzie2

mkzie2 commented Jul 10, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

what exactly we have control over

@shawnborton This is a full list of customizations https://github.com/onfido/onfido-sdk-ui/blob/master/UI_CUSTOMIZATION.md. But it's quite hard to follow. I've investigated the whole Onfido flow and found these mismatched/broken styles and tried to fix them:

Before After
Icon color Screenshot 2025-07-10 at 12 31 01 Screenshot 2025-07-10 at 12 31 27
Focused button Screenshot 2025-07-10 at 12 19 50 focus-dark
Active button Screenshot 2025-07-10 at 12 20 01 active-dark
Hover tertiary button Screenshot 2025-07-10 at 17 13 15 Screenshot 2025-07-10 at 17 10 38
Focus/Active tertiary button Screenshot 2025-07-10 at 17 13 22 Screenshot 2025-07-10 at 17 10 09
Input Screenshot 2025-07-10 at 17 20 30 Screenshot 2025-07-10 at 17 19 32
Focused/Active input Screenshot 2025-07-10 at 17 16 29 Screenshot 2025-07-10 at 17 19 36

@shawnborton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Do we have control over things like border width here?
CleanShot 2025-07-10 at 09 54 23@2x

CleanShot 2025-07-10 at 09 54 36@2x

@mkzie2

mkzie2 commented Jul 11, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Unfortunately we cannot control the button/input border width. We can mostly control the colors and border radius.

@shawnborton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sounds good, thanks for confirming. I guess let's go ahead with final review then?

@shawnborton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cc @ZhenjaHorbach

@ZhenjaHorbach

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jul 11, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I will complete a review today or on the weekend !

@ZhenjaHorbach

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jul 14, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Okay
At least it looks more consistency !

2025-07-14.14.11.25.mov

@ZhenjaHorbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM !

@youssef-lr
youssef-lr merged commit 427a1f2 into Expensify:main Jul 16, 2025
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2025
72 tasks done
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/youssef-lr in version: 9.1.83-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@m-natarajan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Failing with original bug #63961 in Desktop

1752831358061.Onfindo_Broken_style.mp4

@ZhenjaHorbach

ZhenjaHorbach commented Jul 18, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Failing with original bug #63961 in Desktop

1752831358061.Onfindo_Broken_style.mp4

It's not a bug
Since the Onfido library currently does not provide styles to fix this

Снимок экрана 2025-07-18 в 18 38 22

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.1.83-5 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants