Don't show approve button while scanning by bernhardoj · Pull Request #63212 · Expensify/App

bernhardoj · 2025-05-31T04:49:21Z

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #62743
PROPOSAL: #62743 (comment)

Tests

Same as QA Steps

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as QA Steps

QA Steps

Precondition: Disable delay submissions

Open a workspace setting
Disable delay submissions
Create scan expense on the workspace chat
Verify the report preview button doesn't show approve
Open the expense report
Verify there is no approve button
Press the more button
Verify there is no approve option

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

android.mp4

Android: mWeb Chrome

android.mweb.mp4

iOS: Native

ios.mp4

iOS: mWeb Safari

ios.mweb.mp4

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

web.mp4

MacOS: Desktop

desktop.mp4

melvin-bot · 2025-05-31T04:49:27Z

@ishpaul777 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

ishpaul777 · 2025-06-02T18:43:01Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: HybridApp
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: HybridApp
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp

Screen.Recording.2025-06-04.at.2.41.39.AM.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screen.Recording.2025-06-04.at.4.17.19.AM.mov

iOS: HybridApp

Screen.Recording.2025-06-04.at.4.09.15.AM.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screen.Recording.2025-06-04.at.12.50.18.AM.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2025-06-04.at.12.45.41.AM.mov

MacOS: Desktop

Screen.Recording.2025-06-04.at.10.36.05.PM.mov

ishpaul777 · 2025-06-02T19:31:09Z

        hasNoticeTypeViolations(report.reportID, violations, true) ||
        hasWarningTypeViolations(report.reportID, violations, true);
    const reportTransactions = transactions ?? getReportTransactions(report?.reportID);
+    const isAnyReceiptBeingScanned = transactions?.some((transaction) => isReceiptBeingScanned(transaction));


@bernhardoj can you please clarify why not using isPendingCardOrScanningTransaction, as used in canApproveIOU?

I follow the logic from ReportPreviewActionUtils.canSubmit. In IOU.canSubmitReport, we also use isPendingCardOrScanningTransaction, but ReportPreviewActionUtils.canSubmit doesn't use it.

make sense 👍

dangrous · 2025-06-04T19:48:19Z

This created a whole bunch of workflow errors, but I'm pretty sure they shouldn't be errors? For example this one says it can't find isReceiptBeingScanned but I don't know why since it's imported at the top of the file.

@bernhardoj @ishpaul777 can you take a look at these to confirm:

[Due for payment 2025-07-14] [Due for payment 2025-06-16] [Due for payment 2025-06-13] Investigate workflow job failing on main: lint / ESLint check #63474
[Due for payment 2025-07-14] [Due for payment 2025-06-16] [Due for payment 2025-06-13] Investigate workflow job failing on main: typecheck / typecheck #63475
[Due for payment 2025-07-14] [Due for payment 2025-06-16] [Due for payment 2025-06-13] Investigate workflow job failing on main: test / test (job 3) #63476
[Due for payment 2025-07-14] [Due for payment 2025-06-16] [Due for payment 2025-06-13] Investigate workflow job failing on main: test / test (job 1) #63477

I'm rerunning the flows to see if that fixes it.

dangrous · 2025-06-04T19:57:28Z

oh shoot it looks like on the latest main the isReceiptBeingScanned import is removed.

ishpaul777 · 2025-06-04T20:01:08Z

@dangrous i'll create a PR

dangrous · 2025-06-04T20:03:09Z

Thank you!

yeah it looks like in isSubmitAction, etc. we replaced isReceiptBeingScanned with isScanning due to some new background logic - let's use that here too.

ishpaul777 · 2025-06-04T20:14:30Z

@dangrous here it is

bernhardoj · 2025-06-05T04:37:22Z

@ishpaul777 thanks for handling it!

github-actions · 2025-06-05T21:43:57Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/dangrous in version: 9.1.60-1 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

github-actions · 2025-06-09T14:27:47Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.1.61-0 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

github-actions · 2025-06-09T15:00:40Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/dangrous in version: 9.1.62-0 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

github-actions · 2025-06-09T16:31:51Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.1.62-0 🚀

platform	result
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

don't show approve button while scanning

f305b97

bernhardoj requested a review from a team as a code owner May 31, 2025 04:49

melvin-bot Bot requested review from ishpaul777 and removed request for a team May 31, 2025 04:49

ishpaul777 reviewed Jun 2, 2025

View reviewed changes

ishpaul777 approved these changes Jun 4, 2025

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot Bot requested a review from dangrous June 4, 2025 17:14

dangrous approved these changes Jun 4, 2025

View reviewed changes

dangrous merged commit 47b104c into Expensify:main Jun 4, 2025

github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2025

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2025-06-05 #63609

Closed

65 tasks done

melvin-bot Bot mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2025

[Due for payment 2025-06-16][$250] Approve button appears when the receipt is scanning #62743

Closed

4 of 16 tasks

Conversation

bernhardoj commented May 31, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

melvin-bot Bot commented May 31, 2025

Uh oh!

ishpaul777 commented Jun 2, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

ishpaul777 Jun 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

bernhardoj Jun 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ishpaul777 Jun 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

dangrous commented Jun 4, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dangrous commented Jun 4, 2025

Uh oh!

ishpaul777 commented Jun 4, 2025

Uh oh!

dangrous commented Jun 4, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ishpaul777 commented Jun 4, 2025

Uh oh!

bernhardoj commented Jun 5, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 5, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 9, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 9, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 9, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

bernhardoj commented May 31, 2025 •

edited

Loading

ishpaul777 commented Jun 2, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dangrous commented Jun 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dangrous commented Jun 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading