Repository navigation
Display blocking view and remove download button when user have no access to the report - #42312
Conversation
…cess using reportID
|
@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
|
CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅ |
|
Hi, @parasharrajat I just used the I have tried this before my solution but I found that we shouldn't use the If we want to subscribe to the key inside Components then I think we should use Please let me know your thoughts. I will upload the screen records, and go through the PR Author Checklist again after finshing. |
| ComposerFocusManager.setReadyToFocus(); | ||
| }} | ||
| onCarouselAttachmentChange={onCarouselAttachmentChange} | ||
| shouldShowNotFoundPage={!report?.reportID} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As suggested please use data from Onyx key.
we can directly subscribe to the key: ONYXKEYS.IS_LOADING_APP key on the ReportAttachments
We can subscribe to that key in this component.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Subscriping will be through the withOnyx function?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
May be hook is better. useOnyx.
| /> | ||
| )} | ||
| {!isEmptyObject(report) && !isReceiptAttachment ? ( | ||
| {!isEmptyObject(report) && !isReceiptAttachment && !shouldShowNotFoundPage ? ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's wrap the whole view in a condition as !shouldShowNotFoundPage is common between both expressions of ternary. But we should test this thoroughly.
| /> | ||
| )} | ||
| {!isEmptyObject(report) && !isReceiptAttachment ? ( | ||
| {!shouldShowNotFoundPage && (!isEmptyObject(report) && !isReceiptAttachment ? ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
could you please tell me what is exactly wrong about it, I tested it and it works just fine, like before wrapping. The whole view now is wrapped inside ( after !shouldShowNotFoundPage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, missed the (). All good here.
| /> | ||
| )} | ||
| {!isEmptyObject(report) && !isReceiptAttachment ? ( | ||
| {!shouldShowNotFoundPage && (!isEmptyObject(report) && !isReceiptAttachment ? ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you please format this a little differently? It is hard to see the (which makes it confusing.
|
@Ahmed-Abdella Please add all videos in the checklist. |
|
Please sign the CLA #42312 (comment) |
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
@parasharrajat All Done Now. Can't use Links in iOS: Native, Android: Native and MacOS: Desktop, So recorded normal uploading and openning attachments One last thing: |
|
No don't push these files. |
Screenshots🔲 iOS / nativeScreen.Recording.2024-05-23.at.6.15.56.PM.mov🔲 iOS / SafariScreen.Recording.2024-05-23.at.6.03.22.PM.mov🔲 MacOS / DesktopScreen.Recording.2024-05-23.at.5.29.35.PM.mov🔲 MacOS / ChromeScreen.Recording.2024-05-23.at.5.29.35.PM.mov🔲 Android / ChromeScreen.Recording.2024-05-23.at.6.05.34.PM.mov🔲 Android / nativeScreen.Recording.2024-05-23.at.6.27.34.PM.mov |
|
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to open any accessible images on native devices as URLs from the web do not work. I also noticed that there are two notFound UIs for attachments.
App/src/components/AttachmentModal.tsx Line 507 in aa9bbcf
I think both are good. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer Checklist
- I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
- If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />. - I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*files and using the translation method - I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
- If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
- If the PR modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added
Designlabel so the design team can review the changes.
- If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - If the
mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps. - I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed
|
@tylerkaraszewski friendly bump for review |
|
@tylerkaraszewski If you have time could you please merge this? |
|
This has conflicts that need to be fixed now, sorry. Please update. |
|
@tylerkaraszewski solved now |
|
@tylerkaraszewski looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the |
|
Not an emergency - removing the label. Follow-up PR to fix the linter error here #42878. |
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 1.4.79-11 🚀
|
Details
Fixed Issues
$ #23374
$ PROPOSAL: #23374 comment
Tests
Offline tests
Same as above, just go offline before step 4
QA Steps
Same
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issuessection aboveTestssectionOffline stepssectionQA stepssectiontoggleReportand notonIconClick)myBool && <MyComponent />.src/languages/*files and using the translation methodSTYLE.md) were followedAvatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases)Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps.Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-05-18.at.5.27.25.AM.mov
Screen.Recording.2024-05-18.at.5.28.14.AM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-05-18.at.4.53.29.AM.1.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-05-18.at.7.16.47.AM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-05-18.at.7.21.00.AM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-05-18.at.6.09.49.AM.1.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-05-18.at.6.53.11.AM.mov