Skip to content

[No QA] Send NPS score and response date to FullStory - #104452

Merged
inimaga merged 4 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
c3024:chaitanya/103321-fullstory-nps-migrated-date
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

inimaga merged 4 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
c3024:chaitanya/103321-fullstory-nps-migrated-date

Conversation

@c3024

@c3024 c3024 commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Sends the new userMetadata fields from Auth PR 25673 to FullStory as nps_score and nps_response_date. The date is converted to Date like free_trial_end_date. Web declares it as a date in the setProperties schema and native adds the _date suffix, so FullStory types it as a date on both. Users who never answered an NPS survey have no fields, so nothing is sent for them.

Fixed Issues

$ #103321
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  1. Run npm test -- tests/unit/FullstoryUtilsTest.ts.
  2. Verify all tests pass, including the check that nps_score and nps_response_date are built from userMetadata.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A. No network behavior changes.

QA Steps

FullStory only runs on production, so this can't be tested on staging.

  1. After deploy, sign in on production as a user who has answered an NPS survey.
  2. Open that user's profile in FullStory.
  3. Verify nps_score and nps_response_date are set.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If the PR adds or modifies the UI:
    • I asked an AI agent to review the changes for accessibility issues and addressed its findings.
    • I tested with a screen reader (VoiceOver on macOS) and verified all new/changed elements are reachable with a logical focus order.
    • I verified all new/changed elements have meaningful accessible names and roles.
    • I verified state changes are announced (e.g. checked/unchecked, expanded/collapsed, selected).
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

N/A, no UI change.

Android: mWeb Chrome

N/A, no UI change.

iOS: Native

N/A, no UI change.

iOS: mWeb Safari

N/A, no UI change.

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

N/A, no UI change.

@c3024 c3024 changed the title Send NPS score and NewDot migrated date to FullStory [HOLD Auth#25673] Send NPS score and NewDot migrated date to FullStory Oct 20, 2026
@c3024 c3024 changed the title [HOLD Auth#25673] Send NPS score and NewDot migrated date to FullStory [No QA] Send NPS score and response date to FullStory Oct 30, 2026
@c3024
c3024 marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2026 14:22
@c3024
c3024 requested review from a team as code owners October 30, 2026 14:22
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from garrettmknight and thelullabyy and removed request for a team October 30, 2026 14:22
@c3024
c3024 requested a review from inimaga October 30, 2026 14:29

@inimaga inimaga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for raising this PR. Could you also update the call inside setUserVars, In the web adapter at src/libs/Fullstory/index.ts,

From:

FullStory(CONST.FULLSTORY.OPERATION.SET_PROPERTIES, {
    type: 'user',
    properties: userVars,
});

To:

FullStory(CONST.FULLSTORY.OPERATION.SET_PROPERTIES, {
    type: 'user',
    properties: userVars,
    schema: {
        properties: {
            nps_response_date: 'date',
        },
    },
});

This would explicitly tell FullStory to treat the property as a date.

@c3024

c3024 commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Done, web now declares nps_response_date as a date in the setProperties schema. Thanks!

@c3024
c3024 requested a review from inimaga November 2, 2026 12:01
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/libs/Fullstory/utils.ts 89.53% <100.00%> (ø)
src/libs/Fullstory/index.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 4871 files with indirect coverage changes

@inimaga
inimaga removed the request for review from thelullabyy November 2, 2026 13:22
@inimaga

inimaga commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If the PR adds or modifies the UI:
    • I asked an AI agent to review the changes for accessibility issues and addressed its findings.
    • I tested with a screen reader (VoiceOver on macOS) and verified all new/changed elements are reachable with a logical focus order.
    • I verified all new/changed elements have meaningful accessible names and roles.
    • I verified state changes are announced (e.g. checked/unchecked, expanded/collapsed, selected).
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@inimaga
inimaga merged commit be13fea into Expensify:main Nov 2, 2026
38 of 40 checks passed
@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 inimaga has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@OSBotify OSBotify mentioned this pull request Nov 2, 2026
75 tasks done
@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/inimaga in version: 9.5.28-4 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No help site update needed. This PR only sends NPS score and response date to FullStory for internal analytics, so nothing changes in the app that users can see or do.


view run

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Nov 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/inimaga in version: 9.5.30-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Nov 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/blimpich in version: 9.5.30-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants