Skip to content

[NO QA] Increase Sentry profiling sample rate to 50% - #103388

Merged
rlinoz merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
rodrigo-sentry-profiling-50-percent
Oct 8, 2026
Merged

[NO QA] Increase Sentry profiling sample rate to 50%#103388
rlinoz merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
rodrigo-sentry-profiling-50-percent

Conversation

@rlinoz

@rlinoz rlinoz commented Oct 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Increase Sentry's profileSessionSampleRate from 0.1 (10%) to 0.5 (50%) to collect more profiles. Trace sampling and the profiling lifecycle remain unchanged.

We have headroom to increase profiling and this will be helpful to get better perf.

Fixed Issues

$ https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C0A3FPPTGJY/p1790206320465189

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

No offline behavior changes are expected. Offline testing has not been performed.

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@rlinoz rlinoz changed the title Increase Sentry profiling sample rate to 50% [NO QA] Increase Sentry profiling sample rate to 50% Oct 7, 2026
@rlinoz
rlinoz marked this pull request as ready for review October 7, 2026 20:47
@rlinoz
rlinoz requested review from a team as code owners October 7, 2026 20:47
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from joekaufmanexpensify and removed request for a team October 7, 2026 20:47
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-07T20:57:28.499171Z a89a5b8 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested a review from grgia October 7, 2026 20:47
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@grgia Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team October 7, 2026 20:47
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 7, 2026 •
edited by github-actions Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/setup/telemetry/setupSentry.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 10 files with indirect coverage changes

@joekaufmanexpensify

joekaufmanexpensify commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No product review needed.

@joekaufmanexpensify
joekaufmanexpensify removed their request for review October 7, 2026 21:23
grgia
grgia approved these changes Oct 8, 2026
View reviewed changes

@grgia grgia left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

requested configuration change; no linked issue or proposal.

can you link the request in the issue?

@rlinoz

rlinoz commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Linked to sentry's suggestion

@rlinoz
rlinoz merged commit f2d50d4 into main Oct 8, 2026
56 of 61 checks passed
@rlinoz
rlinoz deleted the rodrigo-sentry-profiling-50-percent branch October 8, 2026 11:14
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 rlinoz has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #103388.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-android-Adhoc-f2d50d4-c822bcb-f217dc1a25bbe8fbda8a8e66c6625d56d1fa8a20/index.html https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-ios-device-AdHoc-f2d50d4-c822bcb-72e72c8899fd8b7d3033c2c99d046d1fe1ff76dc/index.html
Android iOS
Web 🕸️
https://103388.pr-testing.expensify.com
Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@OSBotify OSBotify mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2026
Closed
90 tasks done
@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/rlinoz in version: 9.5.6-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@MelvinBot

MelvinBot commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No help site update needed. This PR only raises the internal Sentry profiling sample rate, which users can't see.

view run

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Oct 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 9.5.6-6 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@grgia grgia grgia approved these changes

Assignees

@rlinoz rlinoz

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@rlinoz @joekaufmanexpensify @OSBotify @MelvinBot @grgia