Skip to content

Part 1 - Remove onyx connect for the key: ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT in Parser lib - #100121

Merged
inimaga merged 8 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
hoangzinh:66386-remove-onyx-connect-report-pr1
Oct 2, 2026
Merged

inimaga merged 8 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
hoangzinh:66386-remove-onyx-connect-report-pr1

Conversation

@hoangzinh

@hoangzinh hoangzinh commented Sep 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

This is Part 1 of a series focused on removing Onyx.connect for the key ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT in the Parser library. In this pull request, we will:

  • Introduce a new hook useReportIDToNameMap
  • Pass that map at the six call sites that convert report action comment HTML back to markdown (according to Group A here)

Why a plain useOnyx + useMemo hook (not a selector or a context provider)? We benchmarked all three (Reassure, on a 20k-report account) before deciding:

  • Selector — rejected. A useOnyx(COLLECTION.REPORT, {selector}) returning a same-size map makes Onyx run deepEqual over the entire report collection on every COLLECTION.REPORT write, related or not. That's ~7.70 ms/write at 20k reports (~1.44 ms for deepEqual alone + ~5.85 ms for map rebuild) — versus the ~0.03 ms Parser.htmlToMarkdown re-run it would save by skipping a re-render. It also violates PERF-11 ("selector maps an entire collection -> expensive deepEqual").

  • Context provider — rejected. It gives no re-render benefit: its useMemo recomputes a new map reference on every report write, so consumers re-render exactly as often as the plain hook. It only adds indirection plus an always-mounted global computation that runs even when no consumer is open.

  • Raw inline hook — chosen. No large-map deepEqual (cheap shallowEqual), PERF-11-compliant, and only computes while a consumer component is mounted. The extra re-renders it "costs" are trivial (the Parser reparse is ~0.03 ms), far cheaper than the selector's per-write comparison.

Approach re-renders on unrelated report churn per-write cost @20k PERF-11
selector few ~1.44 ms deepEqual no
context provider many (same as raw) map rebuild + provider layer yes
raw useMemo hook many (cheap) map rebuild + ~0.03 ms reparse yes

What's next: validate group B/C/D here

Fixed Issues

$ #66386
PROPOSAL: #66386

Tests

  1. Create a room, e.g. #general.
  2. In a workspace chat, send a message mentioning that room: Hey #general team.
  3. Verify #general renders as a room-mention link.
  4. Copy (exercises getClipboardText): right-click the message -> Copy to clipboard, then paste into something outside the app — a plain text editor, or the browser address bar. Verify it reads Hey #general team and not Hey #Hidden team
  5. Paste (exercises useHtmlPaste): with the same message still on the clipboard, paste into the app's main composer. Verify #general again.
  6. Edit via context menu: right-click the message -> Edit comment
  7. Verify the edit composer shows Hey #general team, not #Hidden. Press Escape.
  8. Edit via ArrowUp: with the composer empty, press the Up arrow. Verify the edit box opens showing Hey #general team.
  9. Unchanged save: open the edit box again and press Enter without typing anything. Verify no (edited) label appears, the message is unchanged.
  10. Real edit: open the edit box, append please, and save. Verify the message becomes Hey #general team please with #general still rendering as a mention link.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If the PR adds or modifies the UI:
    • I asked an AI agent to review the changes for accessibility issues and addressed its findings.
    • I tested with a screen reader (VoiceOver on macOS) and verified all new/changed elements are reachable with a logical focus order.
    • I verified all new/changed elements have meaningful accessible names and roles.
    • I verified state changes are announced (e.g. checked/unchecked, expanded/collapsed, selected).
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Screen.Recording.2026-09-24.at.00.36.05.mov

@20k

20k commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

\o/ thanks for letting me know

@hoangzinh hoangzinh closed this Sep 6, 2026
@hoangzinh hoangzinh reopened this Sep 9, 2026
@hoangzinh
hoangzinh force-pushed the 66386-remove-onyx-connect-report-pr1 branch from 86d67fe to 25c0fb7 Compare September 17, 2026 17:03
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...nents/TextInput/BaseTextInput/HtmlPasteHandler.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...nput/BaseTextInput/implementation/index.native.tsx 85.39% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
src/hooks/useHtmlPaste/index.ts 83.15% <100.00%> (+23.58%) ⬆️
...rc/libs/Clipboard/getClipboardText/index.native.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/libs/actions/Report/index.ts 72.61% <100.00%> (ø)
...report/ContextMenu/BaseReportActionContextMenu.tsx 87.73% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
...inbox/report/ReportActionCompose/useEditMessage.ts 89.28% <100.00%> (+0.39%) ⬆️
...inbox/report/useDraftMessageVideoAttributeCache.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/hooks/useReportIDToNameMap.ts 88.88% <88.88%> (ø)
...rt/ReportActionCompose/ComposerWithSuggestions.tsx 63.63% <50.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️
... and 3 more
... and 12 files with indirect coverage changes

- Create useReportIDToNameMap hook mirroring useAccountIDToNameMap
- Add Parser and hook unit tests for reportIDToName
@hoangzinh
hoangzinh force-pushed the 66386-remove-onyx-connect-report-pr1 branch from 25c0fb7 to 1ec31d3 Compare September 23, 2026 13:03
Part of removing the module-level Onyx.connect for COLLECTION.REPORT in
src/libs/Parser.ts.

Only HTML that reaches the client from the server carries the
`<mention-report reportID="..."/>` form that reportIDToName resolves; the
client's own markdown-to-HTML rule emits `<mention-report>#room</mention-report>`,
which round-trips without the map. Report action comment HTML is the field
confirmed to carry the reportID form, so its six call sites now pass the map
explicitly rather than relying on the module-level fallback.

Components and hooks read the map from useReportIDToNameMap. Module-scope
helpers and the action layer take it as a parameter instead: getClipboardText,
setClipboardMessage and setClipboardMessageWithCleanedMentions gain an optional
argument so the many callers that copy translated strings stay untouched, and
editReportComment receives it from useEditMessage so the unchanged-message guard
resolves mentions the same way the draft was seeded. Seeding the draft and
diffing against it must use the same map, or an untouched save persists
"#Hidden" over the original mention.

Behavior is unchanged while Parser still falls back to the module-level map.

Refs: Expensify#66386
Two failures introduced in 25c0fb7 that block CI.

ParserTest used a literal computed key (`{['42']: ...}`), which trips
no-useless-computed-key; writing the quoted form instead trips the
numeric-key naming rule. Assign after construction, matching the style the
accountIDToName tests in the same file already use.

useReportIDToNameMapTest passed a record of template-literal keys to
Onyx.multiSet, whose `Partial<OnyxInputKeyValueMapping>` parameter rejects the
resulting `[x: string]` index signature. Use one Onyx.set per report: the keys
narrow correctly and the null entry still exercises the skip path.
@hoangzinh hoangzinh changed the title Remove onyx connect for the key: ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT in Parser lib - Part 1 Part 1 - Remove onyx connect for the key: ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT in Parser lib Sep 23, 2026
@hoangzinh
hoangzinh marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2026 14:41
@hoangzinh
hoangzinh requested review from a team as code owners September 23, 2026 14:41
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from dylanexpensify and shubham1206agra and removed request for a team September 23, 2026 14:41
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Sep 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@shubham1206agra Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team September 23, 2026 14:41
Comment thread src/hooks/useReportIDToNameMap.ts
Comment thread src/hooks/useReportIDToNameMap.ts Outdated
Comment thread src/hooks/useReportIDToNameMap.ts Outdated
Comment thread src/hooks/useReportIDToNameMap.ts Outdated
CONSISTENCY-15: spell out the reportID-to-name relationship in the doc
comments instead of using an arrow.

CLEAN-REACT-PATTERNS-0: drop the manual useMemo. The file compiles with
React Compiler under both Babel and OXC (verified with
check-compiler.sh), so the derived map is memoized automatically.
@shubham1206agra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Screen.Recording.2026-09-24.at.5.15.30.PM.mov

@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Sep 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #66386 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested a review from inimaga September 24, 2026 11:47

@dylanexpensify dylanexpensify left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Product input not required.

Comment thread src/hooks/useHtmlPaste/index.ts Outdated
@@ -42,6 +44,8 @@ const insertAtCaret = (target: HTMLElement, insertedText: string, maxLength: num
};

const useHtmlPaste: UseHtmlPaste = (textInputRef, preHtmlPasteCallback, isActive = false, maxLength = CONST.MAX_COMMENT_LENGTH + 1) => {
const reportIDToName = useReportIDToNameMap();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we avoid subscribing to reports here when HTML paste is disabled? This hook also runs for regular text fields, so updates to any report now make each field rebuild the full report-name map, even though it never uses it. That adds unnecessary work for accounts with lots of reports.

@hoangzinh hoangzinh Sep 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch @inimaga . There are 23 type="markdown" inputs, so the hook does need the map for those, but every other text field in the app is paying for nothing.

Digging into where the cost actually is: the subscription itself is cheap — Onyx keeps one frozen collection snapshot per key (OnyxCache.js) and hands the same reference to every subscriber (OnyxUtils.js), so the reports aren't duplicated. What duplicates is the derived map: on a 20k-report fixture it's ~3.3 ms to rebuild and ~176 KB retained, per mounted input, on every report write.

So rather than gating the subscription, I'd move the build into the paste callback and resolve only handlePastedHTML is triggered:

const [reports] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT);

const handlePastedHTML = useCallback(
    (html: string) => {
        paste(Parser.htmlToMarkdown(html, {reportIDToName: buildReportIDToNameMap(reports)}));
    },
    [paste, reports],
);

It runs once per paste instead of once per report write.

Being upfront about what that doesn't solve: the hook still subscribes, so regular text fields still re-render on report writes — just without the rebuild. If you'd rather they hold no subscription at all, I can additionally move the useHtmlPaste call into a small child rendered only when isMarkdownEnabled (conditional render instead of conditional hook).

// in BaseTextInput/implementation/index.tsx, replacing the direct useHtmlPaste call
{isMarkdownEnabled && <HtmlPasteHandler inputRef={input} maxLength={maxLength} />}

function HtmlPasteHandler({inputRef, maxLength}: HtmlPasteHandlerProps) {
    const reportIDToName = useReportIDToNameMap();
    useHtmlPaste(inputRef, undefined, true, maxLength, reportIDToName);
    return null;
}

Happy to do any option; let me know what your preferences are.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for digging into this. Let’s use the small child component so regular text fields don’t subscribe to reports at all. Building the map only when HTML is pasted also makes sense. That avoids both the unused subscriptions and repeated map builds. The child should call the revised useHtmlPaste directly, without calling useReportIDToNameMap.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@inimaga I added in this commit 66f0c56. Also add unit tests to cover this in 3647305

…HTML

Addresses review feedback: useHtmlPaste is shared by every TextInput, so reading
the report collection in the hook body made plain text fields subscribe to
reports and rebuild the name map on every report write, even though a
non-markdown input never registers the paste listener at all.

Two changes:

- Build the map inside handlePastedHTML rather than in render, so it costs
  nothing until a paste happens. buildReportIDToNameMap is exported from
  useReportIDToNameMap for this; the hook itself is unchanged.
- Move the useHtmlPaste call into a small HtmlPasteHandler child that
  BaseTextInput renders only when the input is markdown. A hook cannot be
  called conditionally, but a component can be rendered conditionally, so
  plain text fields now mount nothing and hold no subscription.

Applied to both platform files even though useHtmlPaste is a no-op on native,
to keep the two implementations parallel.
@inimaga

inimaga commented Sep 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Conflicts 😬

Neither behaviour was covered: the existing useHtmlPaste suite only exercises
handlePastePlainText, so every test passed both before and after the paste path
started resolving report mentions, and would still pass if the map were dropped.

Adds two guards, each verified to fail when its change is reverted:

- useHtmlPasteTest gains a handlePastedHTML block that dispatches the text/html
  clipboard flavour carrying <mention-report reportID>, asserting it lands as
  the room name, plus the #Hidden case for a report absent from Onyx. Removing
  the map turns the first into "Hey #Hidden team".
- BaseTextInputImplementationTest asserts the paste hook mounts for
  type="markdown" and not for a plain input, guarding the report subscription
  against leaking back into every text field in the app.

The second is a new file because BaseTextInputTest mocks
BaseTextInput/implementation away to inspect forwarded props, so anything
needing the real implementation rendered cannot live there.
# Conflicts:
#	src/components/TextInput/BaseTextInput/implementation/index.tsx
@hoangzinh
hoangzinh force-pushed the 66386-remove-onyx-connect-report-pr1 branch from 138be75 to 6e75639 Compare September 30, 2026 23:32
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

Main added two member-work-arrangement cases to ContextMenuActionsCopyMessageTest
that assert the single-argument getClipboardText. setClipboardMessage now always
forwards a second argument, so these go the same way as the other
translated-string branches: the explicit `undefined` records that those paths
deliberately carry no report name map.
@hoangzinh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Conflicts 😬

@inimaga I resolved conflicts 😬

@inimaga
inimaga merged commit 5441128 into Expensify:main Oct 2, 2026
35 of 37 checks passed
@inimaga

inimaga commented Oct 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks! LGTM

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 inimaga has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Oct 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify OSBotify mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2026
59 tasks done
@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Oct 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/inimaga in version: 9.5.2-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No help site update is needed. This PR is an internal refactor: it replaces Onyx.connect with a new useReportIDToNameMap hook for converting room mentions back to markdown. Copy, paste, and edit behavior stays the same, so no help article sentence becomes wrong.


view run

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Oct 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.5.2-4 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants