You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Version Number: Reproducible in staging?: Needs Reproduction Reproducible in production?: Needs Reproduction If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): Logs:https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856 Expensify/Expensify Issue URL: Issue reported by:@shawnborton Slack conversation (hyperlinked to channel name): #Expensify Bugs
Action Performed:
As admin view the uncategorized submitted expense
Observe the Concierge categorization message
Expected Result:
Use normal message body text.
Use medium-sized buttons to match other message interactions.
Ensure styling is consistent with our current design system and previously approved specs.
Actual Result:
Message text is styled with bold/headline formatting rather than standard body text.
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Select the officially supported platforms where the issue was reproduced:
Android: App
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: App
iOS: mWeb Safari
iOS: mWeb Chrome
Windows: Chrome
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop
Platforms Tested:
On which of our officially supported platforms was this issue tested:
Android: App
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: App
iOS: mWeb Safari
iOS: mWeb Chrome
Windows: Chrome
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
Expected result with regular message style and medium-size buttons
FontUtils.fontFamily.platform.EXP_NEW_KANSAS_MEDIUM is just an example, fint style should be confirmed with design team.
and we need to verify the font weight for primary buttons ie. success style buttons as well.
and conditionally pass above style in case we want to render primary button with bold text
Also pass the font style as additional styles EXP_NEW_KANSAS_MEDIUM or whatever font style design team suggests.
What specific scenarios should we cover in automated tests to prevent reintroducing this issue in the future?
NA
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)
Reminder: Please use plain English, be brief and avoid jargon. Feel free to use images, charts or pseudo-code if necessary. Do not post large multi-line diffs or write walls of text. Do not create PRs unless you have been hired for this job.
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.1.50-0 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
@dominictb@mallenexpensify@dominictb The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
1a. Result of the original design (eg. a case wasn't considered)
1b. Mistake during implementation
1c. Backend bug
1z. Other: Design update
Where bug was reported:
2a. Reported on production (eg. bug slipped through the normal regression and PR testing process on staging)
2b. Reported on staging (eg. found during regression or PR testing)
2d. Reported on a PR
2z. Other:
Who reported the bug:
3a. Expensify user
3b. Expensify employee
3c. Contributor
3d. QA
3z. Other:
[Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to comment: NA, design update
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion: NA
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.
Link to issue:
Regression Test Proposal
Precondition:
A workspace with "Members must categorize all expenses" enabled
Test:
Submit an expense to that workspace without setting a category
Verify the auto categorization message from Concierge has normal font weight and medium sized buttons like this mockup:
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon May 5, 2025
Triggered auto assignment to @mallenexpensify (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.MelvinBot commentedon May 5, 2025
This has been labelled "Needs Reproduction". Follow the steps here: https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/16989
shawnborton commentedon May 5, 2025
cc @jasperhuangg @marcochavezf @thienlnam
dominictb commentedon May 5, 2025
@mallenexpensify I can reproduce the issue following the same steps in OP:
I can take over as C+ as per this Slack thread.
ChavdaSachin commentedon May 5, 2025
🚨 Edited by proposal-police: This proposal was edited at 2025-05-05 19:34:45 UTC.
Proposal
Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.
Concierge Categorization Message Uses Incorrect Styles
What is the root cause of that problem?
isMediumSized: trueis not passed here.App/src/pages/home/report/PureReportActionItem.tsx
Lines 663 to 668 in 700d44a
We do pass this prop to other buttons.
App/src/pages/home/report/PureReportActionItem.tsx
Line 685 in 700d44a
App/src/pages/home/report/PureReportActionItem.tsx
Line 693 in 700d44a
...
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?
pass
isMediumSized: truehere to fix the button size.App/src/pages/home/report/PureReportActionItem.tsx
Lines 663 to 668 in 700d44a
additionally pass as additional button style to fix font style and weight.
pass here if we just want categorize buttons to have normal font weight
App/src/pages/home/report/PureReportActionItem.tsx
Lines 663 to 668 in 700d44a
or pass here if we want every concierge action button to render with normal font weight.
App/src/components/ReportActionItem/ActionableItemButtons.tsx
Line 31 in d231433
Note
FontUtils.fontFamily.platform.EXP_NEW_KANSAS_MEDIUM is just an example, fint style should be confirmed with design team.
and we need to verify the font weight for primary buttons ie. success style buttons as well.
and conditionally pass above style in case we want to render primary button with bold text
Also pass the font style as additional styles EXP_NEW_KANSAS_MEDIUM or whatever font style design team suggests.
What specific scenarios should we cover in automated tests to prevent reintroducing this issue in the future?
NA
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)
Reminder: Please use plain English, be brief and avoid jargon. Feel free to use images, charts or pseudo-code if necessary. Do not post large multi-line diffs or write walls of text. Do not create PRs unless you have been hired for this job.
37 remaining items
melvin-bot commentedon May 23, 2025
Reviewinglabel has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".melvin-bot commentedon May 23, 2025
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.1.50-0 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2025-05-30. 🎊
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
melvin-bot commentedon May 23, 2025
@dominictb @mallenexpensify @dominictb The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
melvin-bot commentedon Jun 2, 2025
@mallenexpensify Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!
dominictb commentedon Jun 2, 2025
BugZero Checklist:
Bug classification
Source of bug:
Where bug was reported:
Who reported the bug:
[Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to comment: NA, design update
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion: NA
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.
Link to issue:
Regression Test Proposal
Precondition:
Test:
Do we agree 👍 or 👎
mallenexpensify commentedon Jun 3, 2025
Contributor: @dominictb paid $250 via Upwork
Contributor+: @bernhardoj due $250 via NewDot
Test case created, thx y'all
bernhardoj commentedon Jun 3, 2025
Requested in ND.
JmillsExpensify commentedon Jun 9, 2025
$250 approved for @bernhardoj