You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[$250] Pay with business BA - System message is "paid x", while thread header is "paid x elsewhere" #48560
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
After discussion in Slack we think this is probably a regression from the linked PR, we are going to work with @bondydaa@brandonhenry@allroundexperts to fix this regression!
Trying to replicate this again and I am not able to get the option for "Pay with business bank account". If I try using Pay with Expensify then the text is for thread title and system message.
I'm not following this. Can you confirm these steps and include a video to confirm it's not reproducible:
Create a workspace
Enable Workflows > Make or Track Payments > Connect bank account
Submit an expense to the workspace
Click "Pay with Expensify" to pay it via the connected bank account
Click reply on the "paid $x.xx" system message to open a thread
Also unrelated to this issue but, while checking I noticed that an expense is greyed out even when no changes were done after going offline Here are some rough steps for it:
Follow steps from original issue
Turn off offline mode
Clear the error
Check that payment button is visible
Turn on offline mode
Validate that the expense is not greyed out
Can you confirm if this is something that needs to be changed?
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon Sep 4, 2024
Triggered auto assignment to @isabelastisser (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.melvin-bot commentedon Sep 4, 2024
Triggered auto assignment to @AndrewGable (
DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.github-actions commentedon Sep 4, 2024
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
AndrewGable commentedon Sep 4, 2024
Trying to figure out which PR introduced this since it doesn't happen on prod
AndrewGable commentedon Sep 4, 2024
@bondydaa / @MariaHCD - I am curious if you think this revert revert PR could possibly be related? #48421
AndrewGable commentedon Sep 4, 2024
After discussion in Slack we think this is probably a regression from the linked PR, we are going to work with @bondydaa @brandonhenry @allroundexperts to fix this regression!
60 remaining items
isabelastisser commentedon Oct 3, 2024
@allroundexperts, can you please provide an update? Thanks!
allroundexperts commentedon Oct 7, 2024
Since this is no longer reproducible, I think we can close this issue.
trjExpensify commentedon Oct 7, 2024
I'm not following this. Can you confirm these steps and include a video to confirm it's not reproducible:
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 9, 2024
📣 It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸
jaydamani commentedon Oct 10, 2024
@trjExpensify
It shows "Paid x with expensify" for both header and message which seems correct.
1.New.Expensify.-.Google.Chrome.2024-10-10.18-39-25.mp4
Also unrelated to this issue but, while checking I noticed that an expense is greyed out even when no changes were done after going offline Here are some rough steps for it:
Can you confirm if this is something that needs to be changed?
isabelastisser commentedon Oct 10, 2024
@allroundexperts can you follow up on the comments above? Thanks!
isabelastisser commentedon Oct 15, 2024
@allroundexperts, please provide an update! I will DM you for visibility, thanks!
trjExpensify commentedon Oct 16, 2024
Great, so this bug is resolved and we can close this.