Repository navigation
[READY FOR PAYMENT][$125] Report fields - List type report field shows "List is required" when there is an initial value #46223
Description
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: 9.0.12-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: N/A
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Issue found when executing PR #44139
Action Performed:
Precondition:
- Workspace is under Control plan
- Report fields feature is enabled
- List type report field is added, and the list has an initial value
- Go to workspace chat
- Split a manual expense
- Go to Troubleshoot > Clear cache and restart > Reset and restart
- Go to workspace chat
- Split another manual expense (because violations do not show up instantly)
- Go to expense report
Expected Result:
List type report field will not display "List is required" violation because there is an initial value
Actual Result:
List type report field displays "List is required" violation when there is an initial value
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
Bug6552686_1721913687120.20240725_212026.mp4
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
- Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01fa66587c84d7c165
- Upwork Job ID: 1823770004376025525
- Last Price Increase: 2024-08-14
- Automatic offers:
- nkdengineer | Contributor | 103527627
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @JmillsExpensifyMetadata
Metadata
Labels
Type
Projects
- Status
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon Jul 25, 2024
Triggered auto assignment to @Beamanator (
DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.github-actions commentedon Jul 25, 2024
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
francoisl commentedon Jul 25, 2024
@thienlnam is this also something about report fields we can polish with a follow-up PR?
Beamanator commentedon Jul 25, 2024
Assigning jack since this is part of your
Report Field ViolationsProject 🙏Beamanator commentedon Jul 25, 2024
Also if this is under beta we can demote, is there a report fields beta?
reportFieldsFeaturei think?thienlnam commentedon Jul 25, 2024
Yeah, we definitely can address - @jnowakow another one to fix
thienlnam commentedon Jul 25, 2024
@Beamanator That beta is for setting up report fields in NewDot - slightly unrelated to showing them, but I don't think this needs to be a blocker
53 remaining items
melvin-bot commentedon Sep 23, 2024
This issue has not been updated in over 14 days. @JmillsExpensify, @thienlnam, @war-in, @nkdengineer eroding to Weekly issue.
nkdengineer commentedon Sep 30, 2024
@JmillsExpensify Gentle bump on #46223 (comment)
TIA
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 16, 2024
This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. @JmillsExpensify, @thienlnam, @war-in, @nkdengineer eroding to Monthly issue.
P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do!
nkdengineer commentedon Oct 30, 2024
@JmillsExpensify Gentle bump on #46223 (comment)
TIA
JmillsExpensify commentedon Nov 27, 2024
Ah sorry I missed this in my filters as the payment has no date.
JmillsExpensify commentedon Nov 27, 2024
All paid out. Closing this one.
garrettmknight commentedon Jun 10, 2025
Payment summary:
JmillsExpensify commentedon Jun 10, 2025
$125 approved for @allroundexperts
allroundexperts commentedon Jun 10, 2025
@garrettmknight @JmillsExpensify My payment is $250 here (which is the standard amount for a deploy blocker PR review). We paid $125 to @nkdengineer because there proposal was used by the SWM team.
allroundexperts commentedon Jun 10, 2025
Actually, I just checked again and this was a regression issue of a PR that I reviewed. I am not due for any compensation here. I will remove the expense from the report.
JmillsExpensify commentedon Jun 10, 2025
Ah thanks!