Skip to content

[HOLD for payment 2024-07-25] [$250] [Payment card / Subscription] When adding Payment card, there is a slight delay before it shows #44904

Description

@lanitochka17

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 9.0.4-6
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: N/A
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team

Issue found when executing PR #44361

Action Performed:

  1. Access staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Sign into a valid account (Beta enabled)
  3. Access https://staging.new.expensify.com/settings/subscription/add-payment-card
  4. Input valid card data & Save

Expected Result:

User expects that after saving the card data immediately loads and displays

Actual Result:

Several seconds go by before the card actually appears on the Sub page, leading the user to think the details did not save

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6534057_1720183810076.Add_payment_takes_a_while_to_load.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01b996dd4f4317410f
  • Upwork Job ID: 1809282225502876268
  • Last Price Increase: 2024-07-05
  • Automatic offers:
    • dominictb | Contributor | 103066195
Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @getusha

Activity

  1. added
    DeployBlockerCashThis issue or pull request should block deployment
    DeployBlockerIndicates it should block deploying the API
    on Jul 5, 2024
  2. melvin-bot commented on Jul 5, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @mountiny (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

  3. github-actions commented on Jul 5, 2024

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

    1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
    2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
    3. Fix the issue yourself.
  4. added and removed
    DeployBlockerCashThis issue or pull request should block deployment
    DeployBlockerIndicates it should block deploying the API
    on Jul 5, 2024
  5. lanitochka17 commented on Jul 5, 2024

    @lanitochka17
    Author

    @mountiny FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors

  6. mountiny commented on Jul 5, 2024

    @mountiny
    Contributor

    Not a blocker since this is behind beta

    @blimpich I hope you dont mind I will assign you.

    Are we not handling this optimistically? Feels like we should, but if not there should be some loader

  7. 61 remaining items

  8. melvin-bot commented on Jul 18, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

  9. melvin-bot commented on Jul 18, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.8-6 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

    If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-07-25. 🎊

    For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

  10. melvin-bot commented on Jul 18, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    • [@getusha] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
    • [@getusha] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
    • [@getusha] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
    • [@getusha] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
    • [@getusha] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
    • [@sonialiap] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
  11. sonialiap commented on Jul 25, 2024

    @sonialiap
    Contributor

    Payment summary:
    @getusha $250 - please request in ND - please complete the checklist
    @dominictb $250 - paid ✔️

  12. melvin-bot commented on Jul 30, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    @sonialiap, @blimpich, @getusha, @dominictb Eep! 4 days overdue now. Issues have feelings too...

  13. getusha commented on Jul 30, 2024

    @getusha
    Contributor

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    • The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: remove GBP as a currency for the subscription page #44858
    • The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/44858/files#r1697402990
    • A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: N/a
    • Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. No, seems like a slight improvement / polish
    • If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again. N/a
  14. JmillsExpensify commented on Jul 30, 2024

    @JmillsExpensify
    Contributor

    $250 approved for @getusha

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to productionBugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.DailyKSv2EngineeringExternalAdded to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor

Type

No type

Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions