Skip to content

[HOLD for payment 2024-04-15] [$500] IOU - Opening IOU receipt leads to not here page #39404

Description

@kbecciv

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 1.4.59-0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: n
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team

Action Performed:

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to FAB > Request money.
  3. Create a manual request with receipt from user that has no unsettled IOU.
  4. In 1:1 DM, click on the IOU preview.
  5. Click on the receipt.

Expected Result:

Receipt opens without issue.

Actual Result:

Opening IOU receipt leads to not here page

Workaround:

n/a

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6435480_1712058058413.receipt.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0170155bec83d697ff
  • Upwork Job ID: 1775191991451828224
  • Last Price Increase: 2024-04-02

Activity

  1. melvin-bot commented on Apr 2, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @iwiznia (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

  2. kbecciv commented on Apr 2, 2024

    @kbecciv
    Author

    We think that this bug might be related to #wave-collect - Release 1

  3. github-actions commented on Apr 2, 2024

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

    1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
    2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
    3. Fix the issue yourself.
  4. bernhardoj commented on Apr 2, 2024

    @bernhardoj
    Contributor

    Proposal

    Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

    Opening the money request receipt shows not found page.

    What is the root cause of that problem?

    The condition to show the not found page is checking whether the report parentReportID is not the same as the transaction reportID.

    shouldShowNotFoundPage={(report?.parentReportID ?? '') !== transaction?.reportID}

    When this code is made, we can only open the receipt from the transaction thread, so report parentReportID will point to the IOU/expense report, which is the same as transaction reportID.

    However, after the one transaction report view PR, we are showing the receipt and other money request fields in the IOU report, so the condition is always false because IOU report parentReportID points to the chat report.

    What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

    We should check whether the report is a money request report or not. If it's a money request report, we just take the reportID, otherwise take the parentReportID.

    const moneyRequestReportID = ReportUtils.isMoneyRequestReport(report) ? report?.reportID : report?.parentReportID;
    
    shouldShowNotFoundPage={(moneyRequestReportID ?? '') !== transaction?.reportID}
    
  5. shubham1206agra commented on Apr 2, 2024

    @shubham1206agra
    Contributor

    @bernhardoj Can you update your solution to cover Track Expense on selfDM?

  6. bernhardoj commented on Apr 2, 2024

    @bernhardoj
    Contributor

    I don't see the problem with track expense

  7. shubham1206agra commented on Apr 2, 2024

    @shubham1206agra
    Contributor

    Just make a track expense with the receipt. And try to open the receipt.

  8. bernhardoj commented on Apr 2, 2024

    @bernhardoj
    Contributor
    Screen.Recording.2024-04-02.at.23.40.39.mov

    Works fine.

  9. shubham1206agra commented on Apr 2, 2024

    @shubham1206agra
    Contributor

    Oh. Looks like a BE issue, then. Please continue here.

  10. added
    ExternalAdded to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor
    on Apr 2, 2024
  11. 25 remaining items

  12. melvin-bot commented on Apr 8, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

  13. melvin-bot commented on Apr 8, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.60-13 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

    If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-04-15. 🎊

    For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

    • @bernhardoj requires payment (Needs manual offer from BZ)
    • @dukenv0307 requires payment (Needs manual offer from BZ)
  14. melvin-bot commented on Apr 8, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    • [@dukenv0307] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
    • [@dukenv0307] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
    • [@dukenv0307] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
    • [@dukenv0307] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
    • [@dukenv0307] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
    • [@alexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
  15. alexpensify commented on Apr 12, 2024

    @alexpensify
    Contributor

    @dukenv0307 and @bernhardoj - please submit a request here:

    https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0170155bec83d697ff

    On Monday, I can complete the payment process. Thanks!

  16. bernhardoj commented on Apr 13, 2024

    @bernhardoj
    Contributor

    Applied!

  17. dukenv0307 commented on Apr 15, 2024

    @dukenv0307
    Contributor

    @dukenv0307 and @bernhardoj - please submit a request here:

    @alexpensify Thanks, I've applied to the job too

  18. melvin-bot commented on Apr 15, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    Payment Summary

    Upwork Job

    BugZero Checklist (@alexpensify)

    • I have verified the correct assignees and roles are listed above and updated the neccesary manual offers
    • I have verified that there are no duplicate or incorrect contracts on Upwork for this job (https://www.upwork.com/ab/applicants/1775191991451828224/hired)
    • I have paid out the Upwork contracts or cancelled the ones that are incorrect
    • I have verified the payment summary above is correct
  19. alexpensify commented on Apr 15, 2024

    @alexpensify
    Contributor

    @dukenv0307 and @bernhardoj - I've sent you offers via Upwork. Please accept and I can complete the payment process.

  20. bernhardoj commented on Apr 16, 2024

    @bernhardoj
    Contributor

    @alexpensify accepted

  21. alexpensify commented on Apr 16, 2024

    @alexpensify
    Contributor

    Thanks, I was able to complete the payment to @bernhardoj.

    @dukenv0307, please accept the offer in Upwork, and I can complete the process. Thanks!

  22. dukenv0307 commented on Apr 17, 2024

    @dukenv0307
    Contributor

    @alexpensify I accepted the UW offer

  23. alexpensify commented on Apr 17, 2024

    @alexpensify
    Contributor

    Perfect, @dukenv0307 has been paid via Upwork. Closing since everyone has been paid via Upwork.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to productionBugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.DailyKSv2EngineeringExternalAdded to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions