You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[HOLD for payment 2024-04-15] [Violations] [$500] Multilevel tags - "no longer valid" violation is shown after selecting all the tags #38044
Version Number: 1.4.50-2 Reproducible in staging?: y Reproducible in production?: n If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): Logs:https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856 Expensify/Expensify Issue URL: Issue reported by: Applause internal team Slack conversation:
Action Performed:
Precondition:
User is an employee of Collect workspaces that have independent and dependent multilevel tags.
Tag requirement is toggled on.
Go to staging.new.expensify.com
Go to workspace chat.
Create a manual request without tags.
Go to request details page.
Select all the tags.
Expected Result:
Tag violation will disappear after selecting the tags.
Actual Result:
After selecting all the tag, the last tag shows "no longer valid".
Workaround:
unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
@grgia FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors.
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.60-13 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
[@dukenv0307] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
[@dukenv0307] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
[@dukenv0307] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
[@dukenv0307] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
[@dukenv0307] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[@laurenreidexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: N/A
The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: N/A
A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: N/A
Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. No
If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again. N/A
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon Mar 11, 2024
Triggered auto assignment to @laurenreidexpensify (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.github-actions commentedon Mar 11, 2024
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
melvin-bot commentedon Mar 11, 2024
Triggered auto assignment to @grgia (
Engineering), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.kavimuru commentedon Mar 11, 2024
@grgia FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors.
kavimuru commentedon Mar 11, 2024
We think this bug might be related to #wave6-collect-submitters. cc @greg-schroeder
grgia commentedon Mar 11, 2024
Maybe related to #37461
grgia commentedon Mar 11, 2024
Asked in slack https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C07J32337/p1710167047439949
53 remaining items
melvin-bot commentedon Apr 8, 2024
Reviewinglabel has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".melvin-bot commentedon Apr 8, 2024
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.60-13 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-04-15. 🎊
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
melvin-bot commentedon Apr 8, 2024
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
laurenreidexpensify commentedon Apr 15, 2024
Payment Summary:
laurenreidexpensify commentedon Apr 15, 2024
Waiting on @dukenv0307 to complete checklist and confirm regression steps
laurenreidexpensify commentedon Apr 17, 2024
Bump for checklist @dukenv0307
dukenv0307 commentedon Apr 19, 2024
BugZero Checklist:
dukenv0307 commentedon Apr 19, 2024
@laurenreidexpensify Sorry for the delay. I completed the checklist ^