Skip to content

[HOLD for payment 2024-03-19] [HOLD for payment 2024-03-18] By clicking on highlighted WS user, the checkbox is not selected or opening the details of the member #37942

Closed

Description

@kavimuru

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 1.4.49-0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: no, new feature
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: applause internal team
Slack conversation:

Action Performed:

  1. Access staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Sign into an account
  3. Create a workspace
  4. Go to WS settings and add members
  5. Tap on the users highlighted name

Expected Result:

User expects the checkbox to highlight when the user selects the name, or a redirect

Actual Result:

The checkbox does not highlight when the user clicks on the members name, clicking on the name "highlights" as if something should happen, but nothing does.
NOTE : In production checkbox getting selected

Workaround:

unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6406307_1709857752247.WS_user_does_not_highlight.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Activity

  1. added
    DeployBlockerCashThis issue or pull request should block deployment
    BugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.
    on Mar 8, 2024
  2. melvin-bot commented on Mar 8, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @bfitzexpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

  3. github-actions commented on Mar 8, 2024

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

    1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
    2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
    3. Fix the issue yourself.
  4. melvin-bot commented on Mar 8, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @marcaaron (Engineering), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

  5. kavimuru commented on Mar 8, 2024

    @kavimuru
    Author

    @marcaaron FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors.

  6. ahmedGaber93 commented on Mar 8, 2024

    @ahmedGaber93
    Contributor

    I think it is related to #37715 and will fix in a follow up issue #37927.
    to fix this we need to navigate to user profile on item click and keep select by checkbox only by add Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.PROFILE.getRoute(item.accountID)); before return here

  7. marcaaron commented on Mar 8, 2024

    @marcaaron
    Contributor
  8. marcaaron commented on Mar 8, 2024

    @marcaaron
    Contributor

    @ahmedGaber93 I don't see this issue in that list so assuming this is a blocker unless @luacmartins says otherwise.

  9. 10 remaining items

  10. luacmartins commented on Mar 8, 2024

    @luacmartins
    Contributor

    Tested in staging, it's a pass!

  11. changed the title [-]By clicking on highlighted WS user, the checkbox is not selected or opening the details of the member[/-] [+][HOLD for payment 2024-03-18] By clicking on highlighted WS user, the checkbox is not selected or opening the details of the member[/+] on Mar 11, 2024
  12. melvin-bot commented on Mar 11, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

  13. melvin-bot commented on Mar 11, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.49-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

    If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-03-18. 🎊

  14. melvin-bot commented on Mar 11, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    • [@luacmartins] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: #35715 workspace member details page #37715
    • [@luacmartins] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: we were aware of the issue, but since this a new feature we're still building part of the functionality, which is the case here.
    • [@luacmartins] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
    • [@luacmartins] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. N/A
    • [@luacmartins] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
    • [@bfitzexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
  15. changed the title [-][HOLD for payment 2024-03-18] By clicking on highlighted WS user, the checkbox is not selected or opening the details of the member[/-] [+][HOLD for payment 2024-03-19] [HOLD for payment 2024-03-18] By clicking on highlighted WS user, the checkbox is not selected or opening the details of the member[/+] on Mar 12, 2024
  16. melvin-bot commented on Mar 12, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.50-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

    If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-03-19. 🎊

  17. melvin-bot commented on Mar 12, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    • [@luacmartins] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
    • [@luacmartins] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
    • [@luacmartins] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
    • [@luacmartins] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
    • [@luacmartins] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
    • [@bfitzexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
  18. luacmartins commented on Mar 12, 2024

    @luacmartins
    Contributor

    This feature is still a WIP so I don't think we need to worry about the checklist above now. We're addressing all these issues in follow ups.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to productionBugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.EngineeringWeeklyKSv2

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions