Repository navigation
[HOLD for payment 2024-01-25] [HOLD for payment 2024-01-03] Expense - Expense preview with a manual and ongoing scan does not show "x request, y scanning" #33512
Description
Activity
- addedDeployBlockerCashThis issue or pull request should block deploymentThis issue or pull request should block deployment
on Dec 22, 2023 github-actions commented
on Dec 22, 2023 on Dec 22, 2023 – with GitHub ActionsContributorMore actions👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
- Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
- Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
- Fix the issue yourself.
Triggered auto assignment to @rlinoz (
Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.This is a regression from #32469
- addedReviewingHas a PR in reviewHas a PR in reviewWeeklyKSv2KSv2and removedHourlyKSv2KSv2
on Dec 22, 2023 Opened a PR to fix it
- removedDeployBlockerCashThis issue or pull request should block deploymentThis issue or pull request should block deployment
on Dec 25, 2023 PR is up and merged, but I dont think this needs to be CPed its a minor change so demoting this to not a blocker
Per this comment #33576 (comment) this is still failing on some platforms cc @kbecciv do you have more details?
It failed on mWeb, Desktop and IOS app
RPReplay_Final1703593634.mp4
30 remaining items
- addedBugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.
on Jan 18, 2024 Triggered auto assignment to @twisterdotcom (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.@allroundexperts is due payment for reviewing the PR
This would be on Jan 25 right? The automation should send offers to you both. But I will handle it then if not.
Moving to weekly since it is on hold for payment.
Okay, so I think the payment summary is just:
- @allroundexperts to be paid $500 via NewDot Manual Requests (C+)
Reacted by Rodrigo Lino da Costa and Sibtain Ali$500 payment approved for @allroundexperts based on comment above.
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: 1.4.16-3
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Slack conversation:
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
The expense preview in the workspace chat will show "x request, y scanning
Actual Result:
The expense preview in the workspace chat just shows "Receipt", as if the receipt in the Scan request is part of the manual expense
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
Bug6324154_1703264366246.bandicam_2023-12-22_21-52-25-983__2_.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub