Skip to content

[HOLD for payment 2024-02-07] [$500] Expense - Green dot does not appear in LHN when the request is created in workspace chat #32924

Closed

Description

@kbecciv

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: v1.4.11-13
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: n
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Slack conversation:

Action Performed:

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com.
  2. Create a new workspace.
  3. Click FAB > Request money > Manual.
  4. Request money from a workspace chat.
  5. Note that the green dot appears in the workspace chat in LHN after the request is created.
  6. Create a new workspace.
  7. Go to the workspace chat > + > Request money.
  8. Create a manual expense in the workspace chat.
  9. Click on the expense preview to open report page.
  10. Return to the main chat.

Expected Result:

In Step 8. the green dot will appear next to workspace chat in LHN.

Actual Result:

In Step 8. the green dot does not appear next to the workspace chat in LHN, when the request is created in the workspace chat.
In Step 10, the green dot only appears after opening report page and returning to the main chat.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6310526_1702391036743.bandicam_2023-12-12_18-51-52-627__1_.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~013b75f81794691835
  • Upwork Job ID: 1734657794835312640
  • Last Price Increase: 2023-12-19
  • Automatic offers:
    • getusha | Reviewer | 28066191
    • tienifr | Contributor | 28066192

Activity

  1. github-actions commented on Dec 12, 2023

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

    1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
    2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
    3. Fix the issue yourself.
  2. melvin-bot commented on Dec 12, 2023

    @melvin-bot

    Triggered auto assignment to @nkuoch (Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.

  3. shubham1206agra commented on Dec 12, 2023

    @shubham1206agra
    Contributor

    I am gonna investigate this one in the meantime

  4. shubham1206agra commented on Dec 12, 2023

    @shubham1206agra
    Contributor

    I am unable to repro this. I am not seeing Green Dot Indicator in both cases

  5. luacmartins commented on Dec 12, 2023

    @luacmartins
    Contributor

    I can't reproduce either, but I think that we should show the green dot. It shows up if you navigate to another report and then back to the workspace chat.

  6. shubham1206agra commented on Dec 12, 2023

    @shubham1206agra
    Contributor

    True, but same behaviour is in prod I think. @kbecciv Can you confirm this?

  7. luacmartins commented on Dec 12, 2023

    @luacmartins
    Contributor

    In prod the workspace chat just disappears from the LHN in focus mode lol

  8. shubham1206agra commented on Dec 12, 2023

    @shubham1206agra
    Contributor

    In prod the workspace chat just disappears from the LHN in focus mode lol

    Same in DEV

  9. shubham1206agra commented on Dec 12, 2023

    @shubham1206agra
    Contributor

    In normal mode too

  10. luacmartins commented on Dec 12, 2023

    @luacmartins
    Contributor

    Dev had the same behavior as staging for me

  11. luacmartins commented on Dec 12, 2023

    @luacmartins
    Contributor

    I think we're missing hasOutstandingChildRequest in the chat report

  12. 57 remaining items

  13. melvin-bot commented on Jan 31, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

  14. melvin-bot commented on Jan 31, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.33-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

    If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-02-07. 🎊

    For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

  15. melvin-bot commented on Jan 31, 2024

    @melvin-bot

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    • [@getusha] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
    • [@getusha] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
    • [@getusha] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
    • [@getusha] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
    • [@getusha] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
    • [@dylanexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
  16. getusha commented on Feb 6, 2024

    @getusha
    Contributor

    BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

    [@getusha] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: N/a looks like a case we missed that required Back-End changes.
    [@getusha] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: N/a
    [@getusha] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: N/a
    [@getusha] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. Yes
    [@getusha] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.

    Regression Test Proposal

    1. Create a workspace.
    2. Open the workspace chat
    3. Press + > Manual > Request Money from the workspace chat
    4. Verify that the green dot appears next to workspace chat in LHN.

    Do we agree 👍 or 👎

  17. dylanexpensify commented on Feb 7, 2024

    @dylanexpensify
    Contributor

    today!

  18. dylanexpensify commented on Feb 12, 2024

    @dylanexpensify
    Contributor

    Payment summary:

  19. dylanexpensify commented on Feb 12, 2024

    @dylanexpensify
    Contributor

    done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Awaiting PaymentAuto-added when associated PR is deployed to productionBugSomething is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager.DailyKSv2EngineeringExternalAdded to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions