You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Seems like a backend issue, I think ideally when receipt is not available during distance request update, backend should generate a new receipt based on newly selected waypoints.
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.6-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-12-08. 🎊
After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
External issue reporter
Contributor that fixed the issue
Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
@Santhosh-Sellaveldoes not require payment (Eligible for Manual Requests)
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
[@Santhosh-Sellavel] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
[@Santhosh-Sellavel] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
[@Santhosh-Sellavel] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
[@Santhosh-Sellavel] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
[@Santhosh-Sellavel] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[@stephanieelliott] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 16, 2023
Triggered auto assignment to @stephanieelliott (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.melvin-bot commentedon Oct 16, 2023
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
Platformsin OP are ✅)alitoshmatov commentedon Oct 16, 2023
Looks like receipt is required to edit distance request.
Backend is sending error saying that receipt is not found

I think expected result should be sorted out before proceeding: Should distance request be allowed to be edited if its receipt is deleted?
dummy-1111 commentedon Oct 16, 2023
This looks like a backend issue

The backend returns 404 as below
hnkuanx commentedon Oct 17, 2023
Seems like a backend issue, I think ideally when receipt is not available during distance request update, backend should generate a new receipt based on newly selected waypoints.
stephanieelliott commentedon Oct 20, 2023
Ok, thanks! Adding labels to assign an internal engineer for BE changes.
melvin-bot commentedon Oct 20, 2023
Triggered auto assignment to @danieldoglas (
Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.75 remaining items
melvin-bot commentedon Dec 1, 2023
Reviewinglabel has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".melvin-bot commentedon Dec 1, 2023
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.6-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-12-08. 🎊
After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
melvin-bot commentedon Dec 1, 2023
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
stephanieelliott commentedon Dec 8, 2023
Summarizing payment on this issue:
Upwork job is here
Santhosh-Sellavel commentedon Dec 10, 2023
Regression Steps should be enough here because the behavior was intentional earlier when it was added. Let me know your thoughts @thienlnam
Steps
stephanieelliott commentedon Dec 13, 2023
Issue for QA test here: https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/349090
All clear here, @Santhosh-Sellavel please request your payment via newdot!
Santhosh-Sellavel commentedon Jan 10, 2024
Requested on ND
JmillsExpensify commentedon Jan 14, 2024
$500 payment approved for @Santhosh-Sellavel based on this comment.