Switch izumi aux_clm category non-debug fates testmods from nag to intel#1524
Conversation
Also updating fates external to incorporate fix to fates issue 791.
Also paring back SMS Fates Hydro test from izumi aux_clm due to excess of coverage. Updating externals to point to latest fates. Updating Expected failures list with SMS Fates hydro failure on izumi and out-dated testmod name.
|
Testing on izumi complete. All expected tests pass. All tests b4b with expected exception of fates testmods: Note that the |
|
Testing on cheyenne complete. All expected tests pass. All tests b4b with expected exception of fates testmods for |
|
Because of the update in the "sci" version of FATES there are tests that change answers on both izumi and cheyenne: ERP_Ld9.f45_f45_mg37.I2000Clm50FatesRs.cheyenne_intel.clm-FatesColdDefAllVars ERS_D_Ld5.f10_f10_mg37.I2000Clm50Fates.izumi_nag.clm-FatesColdDef |
Description of changes
In ctsm5.1.dev059 I accidentally introduced tests to the izumi
aux_clmlist that are failing with the nag compiler due to fates issue 771. This PR changes those tests from nag to intel so as to provide parity in coverage between cheyenne and izumi, while avoiding the aforementioned issue.This PR also takes the opportunity to update the externals pointer to the latest version of fates which includes a fix for a different nag issue. It also removes two tests from the izumi fates suite: a fine grid, 3-day
ERPtest in the izumi fates testsuite which was failing MEMLEAK sporadically, and theFatesAllVarstestmod. After discussion with @ekluzek, based on related comments from @billsacks, and review of alternate coverage, it was agreed that removing these two tests would not be detrimental to overall testing. Finally, it also cleans up some additional out-of-date entries in the expected failures list.Specific notes
Contributors other than yourself, if any: @ekluzek
CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #): None
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? Yes, for fates testmods (since the FATES tag updated the science version)
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No
Testing performed, if any: Passes as expected
aux_clmcheyenneaux_clmizumifatesizumifatescheyenne