For the PTCLM tests run as part of test/tools/test_driver.sh, baseline comparisons fail due to a seg fault, at least on cheyenne. I have seen this for blf84 and blfc4 (note that smfg4 is currently failing so the corresponding blfg4 didn't run.
CLM_compare.sh: comparing /glade/scratch/sacks/clmTests/test-driver.18805.bl/TSMscript_tools.PTCLM.PTCLMmkdata.PTCLM_USUMB_clm4_5^buildtools/map_1km-merge-10min_HYDRO1K-merge-nomask_to_1x1pt_US-UMB_nomask_aave_da_c171024.nc
with /glade/scratch/sacks/clmTests/test-driver.18805/TSMscript_tools.PTCLM.PTCLMmkdata.PTCLM_USUMB_clm4_5^buildtools/map_1km-merge-10min_HYDRO1K-merge-nomask_to_1x1pt_US-UMB_nomask_aave_da_c171024.nc
forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
Image PC Routine Line Source
cprnc.cheyenne 0000000000888395 Unknown Unknown Unknown
cprnc.cheyenne 0000000000886157 Unknown Unknown Unknown
cprnc.cheyenne 00000000008333C4 Unknown Unknown Unknown
cprnc.cheyenne 00000000008331D6 Unknown Unknown Unknown
cprnc.cheyenne 00000000008013D6 Unknown Unknown Unknown
cprnc.cheyenne 0000000000804FD0 Unknown Unknown Unknown
libpthread.so.0 00007FFFED3D5870 Unknown Unknown Unknown
cprnc.cheyenne 0000000000475A0E Unknown Unknown Unknown
cprnc.cheyenne 0000000000405965 compare_vars_mod_ 293 compare_vars_mod.F90.in
cprnc.cheyenne 0000000000404E1B compare_vars_mod_ 199 compare_vars_mod.F90.in
cprnc.cheyenne 000000000041387A MAIN__ 92 cprnc.F90
cprnc.cheyenne 000000000040381E Unknown Unknown Unknown
libc.so.6 00007FFFED03FB25 Unknown Unknown Unknown
cprnc.cheyenne 0000000000403729 Unknown Unknown Unknown
CLM_compare.sh: error doing comparison, cprnc error= 174
TBLscript_tools.sh: error from CLM_compare.sh= 2; see /glade/scratch/sacks/clmTests/test-driver.18805/TBLscript_tools.PTCLM.PTCLMmkdata.PTCLM_USUMB_clm4_5^buildtools/cprnc.map_1km-merge-10min_HYDRO1K-merge-nomask_to_1x1pt_US-UMB_nomask_aave_da_c171024.nc.out for details
For the PTCLM tests run as part of
test/tools/test_driver.sh, baseline comparisons fail due to a seg fault, at least on cheyenne. I have seen this forblf84andblfc4(note thatsmfg4is currently failing so the correspondingblfg4didn't run.