RUM-8112: Fix gradients not showing in compose

[jonathanmos]

What does this PR do?

A brief description of the change being made with this pull request.

Motivation

What inspired you to submit this pull request?

Additional Notes

Anything else we should know when reviewing?

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

• Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
• Make sure you discussed the feature or bugfix with the maintaining team in an Issue
• Make sure each commit and the PR mention the Issue number (cf the CONTRIBUTING doc)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 23 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 72.39%. Comparing base (d8e09d6) to head (d2a6dd0).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...onreplay/compose/internal/utils/ReflectionUtils.kt	25.00%	6 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...eplay/compose/internal/utils/BackgroundResolver.kt	91.01%	4 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...y/compose/internal/reflection/ComposeReflection.kt	37.50%	0 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
...l/mappers/semantics/AbstractSemanticsNodeMapper.kt	0.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                            Coverage Diff                             @@
##           jmoskovich/pass-logger-through-mappers    #3471      +/-   ##
==========================================================================
+ Coverage                                   72.24%   72.39%   +0.16%     
==========================================================================
  Files                                         965      966       +1     
  Lines                                       35618    35672      +54     
  Branches                                     5930     5949      +19     
==========================================================================
+ Hits                                        25729    25824      +95     
+ Misses                                       8277     8182      -95     
- Partials                                     1612     1666      +54     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ionreplay/compose/internal/utils/SemanticsUtils.kt	68.45% <100.00%> (-2.43%)	⬇️
...l/mappers/semantics/AbstractSemanticsNodeMapper.kt	77.36% <0.00%> (ø)
...y/compose/internal/reflection/ComposeReflection.kt	36.96% <37.50%> (+36.96%)	⬆️
...eplay/compose/internal/utils/BackgroundResolver.kt	91.01% <91.01%> (ø)
...onreplay/compose/internal/utils/ReflectionUtils.kt	4.40% <25.00%> (+3.13%)	⬆️

... and 39 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[jonathanmos]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7a91816d84

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[0xnm]

We shouldn't do like this, ideally. Is there a possibility to inject the logger into the particular method calls where needed?

[satween]

Also note that it could be named sdk ( Datadog.getInstance("some name here") )

[jonathanmos]

👍 Logger injection will be handled here

[0xnm]

same as above

The base branch was changed.