Skip to content

ci: rewrite storage policy for Blacksmith sticky disks and colocated cache - #395

Merged
DecisionNerd merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/385-blacksmith-storage-policy
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

DecisionNerd merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/385-blacksmith-storage-policy

Conversation

@DecisionNerd

@DecisionNerd DecisionNerd commented Aug 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Closes #385.

Test plan

  • python3 scripts/ci/test-ci-storage-policy.py
  • CI Gate green

Made with Cursor


View with [code]smith Autofix with [code]smith
Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need. Autofix is disabled.

Note

Update CI storage policy script and docs for Blacksmith sticky disks

  • Expands the README.md with a new section documenting allowed and forbidden CI storage patterns, expected sticky-disk keys, and notes on PR/macOS/Windows behavior.
  • Updates error messages in test-ci-storage-policy.py to give actionable guidance: the actions/cache violation now names stickydisk as the correct alternative, and the Maturin sccache:true violation now explains the GitHub-integrated backend and recommends sticky SCCACHE_DIR/target.
  • No logic or detection changes — only message text and documentation are updated.

Macroscope summarized f286bd4.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 43 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: ad12a442-0856-4a3a-928b-50502b678cef

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d8844b and f286bd4.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • .github/workflows/README.md is excluded by !**/*.md, !**/.github/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • scripts/ci/test-ci-storage-policy.py

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation tooling Developer tooling and automation release:none No release note or version impact labels Aug 4, 2026
Document Blacksmith-first allowed/forbidden storage rules so Binding RC
and publish-track can use sticky target/ and colocated cache honestly.

Closes #385.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@DecisionNerd
DecisionNerd force-pushed the ci/385-blacksmith-storage-policy branch from 83d9e8e to f286bd4 Compare August 4, 2026 16:26
@DecisionNerd
DecisionNerd merged commit af88fed into main Aug 4, 2026
18 checks passed
@DecisionNerd
DecisionNerd deleted the ci/385-blacksmith-storage-policy branch August 4, 2026 17:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation release:none No release note or version impact tooling Developer tooling and automation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ci: rewrite storage policy for Blacksmith sticky disks and colocated cache

1 participant