Skip to content

docs: Bind four remaining P1 test-port contracts - #744

Merged
mergify[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/plan-p1tests-20261008
Oct 8, 2026
Merged

mergify[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/plan-p1tests-20261008

Conversation

@Cuarroc

@Cuarroc Cuarroc commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Vier weitere P1-Testports sind als getrennte PLAN-Verträge vorbereitet.
Sender, Priorität und zwei vollständige Store-Testbereiche bleiben jeweils unter 300 Diffzeilen; bestehende Ports werden erhalten.
Root übernimmt Abnahme und Startzuweisung; die Tests sind noch nicht in das Repository portiert.

Report

Only docs/PLAN.md +77/-3 (80 ALL), base origin/main 85ab286 (#681 merged21:42:27Z). Chief disposition of Root-delegated proposal msg-0mv02koqa-49ce4f1b, qualified by qfytpd's contract evidence msg-0mv02o72m-1e798c11. Four independent single-file test-port packages, no size exception. Existing #731/#732/#734 have distinct file lists; #733's handed-off head is unchanged.

Package Exclusive target Frozen P1 range Owner preparation ALL / tests
DR-07c tools/denkraum/sender.test.mjs sender whole 214 / 12
DR-07d tools/denkraum/priority.test.mjs priority whole, supplements DR-05 110 / 6
DR-07e1 tools/denkraum/store-receipts.test.mjs store1-34 +35-169 169 / 10
DR-07e2 tools/denkraum/store-answers-migration.test.mjs store1-34 +170-359 224 / 18

The ALL counts are qfytpd's measured scratch preparation, not Chief's repo implementation measurement. Each actual implementation diff, including imports/duplicated header/ROOT constant, must be measured and remain <=300. Source ranges, exact start lines for all28 store test blocks, full raw SHA256 manifest and permitted D2-only changes are in PLAN. Chief independently rehashed all3 original files and read the complete block-boundary mapping:10+18, no omitted or duplicated store test. Raw file rows109/213/358 exclude the final empty split element; newline-split source numbering/targets are distinguished from actual Git ALL. No source/test files written or tests executed here to claim port completion.

Allowed deviations: synthetic ROOT, constructor rootAgentId fixtures (owner measured sender18/e1 13/e2 8/priority0), CRLF-to-LF and necessary split-boundary blank lines. Preserve embedded child source in store P1:251 inside test starting:248; it has no ROOT and putQuestion does not need it. No shared helper, runtime, package.json, delivery or Playwright changes. Changed server root gate/allowlist can expose a sender HTTP deviation: document compiling RED and obtain a separately scoped Root disposition; do not silently fix production inside a parity port or manufacture RED for already-green imported tests.

Owner proposed existing qfytpd; Root/active execution coordinator binds each actual server execution site after fresh model/vendor/quota/RAM/cargo/slot/ownership checks. One branch/worktree/Draft PR per cut. Same owner executes sequentially, without artificial cross-file predecessor dependencies. Reuse existing port→node→suite/prepush→Root handoff, no new team/dispatcher/agent/QA. Pure test port Tier C; Root may explicitly request B, requiring one foreign vendor at the actual candidate. Runtime findings are newly tiered separately. Ready only after Root head acceptance; Mergify only.

Two previously queued metadata corrections included: WT is already decided as userF1 in PLAN inbox, so remove its stale predecessor wording without changing capabilities; Z4-ARCH-11 now links native verified pending ticket0e7793b4. The proposal's related UUID was invalid; actual parent55ea21ce-1f3d-4fcb-9bf7-704db5660b19 is native-verified and bound in PLAN, no mailbox/plumbing repair.

Evidence

Get-FileHash SHA256 on sender/priority/store:3/3 exact manifest matches, source block inspection exit0; existing PR/state/file-list reads exit0. git diff --check exit0; parseGoals Z1-Z4 problems[]. Normal precommit/secret scan exit0; full own-head bash scripts/ci/gates.sh lane prepush exit0, 132s, candidate6d6612acde0980e1fe01d6d585e112037a842989. First attempt exceeded the native SSH300s limit while Rust compiled after a build lock: incomplete, discarded. After verifying no own gate/cargo survived, fresh resource check22:05:48Z showed12799MiB available and no cargo; complete retry on unchanged head exited0. Denkraum86/86 and hygiene26 files/0 findings in the first attempt are partial evidence only; final full lane is authoritative. Documentation Tier C.

NICHT ABGEDECKT

No repo implementation or future node/prepush/review/acceptance/Windows evidence for these four ports. Owner's101/101 scratch passes used old P1server plus root shim and are not proof on current repo server. Future sender HTTP retry/save routes must run against composed R676 gate/allowlist. Parent P1 coverage/product behavior is not complete from this documentation. Live resource/vendor/owner availability is rechecked at dispatch. Linux excludes cfg(windows) tests and Windows clippy; prepush excludes browser smoke/frontend build/linux workflow gates and external service state. Bounded open PR file checks are not exhaustive process ownership proof. No new worker, Ready/TODO promotion, installation or release performed.

Root-Abnahme (22:16Z)

Stufe C (nur docs/PLAN.md, +77/-3). Chief-prepush Exit 0 am festen Head. Vier P1-Paritätstestports DR-07c/d/e1/e2 als Verträge angenommen. Ready + review-ok gebunden an 6d6612a.

Preserve frozen source hashes, complete store test ranges and bounded D2 deviations. Correct the decided WT predecessor and existing ARCH-11 ticket reference.

No-Test: PLAN contracts and verified metadata only

Co-Authored-By: Codex GPT-6.1-Sol <noreply@openai.com>
@Cuarroc
Cuarroc marked this pull request as ready for review October 8, 2026 22:16
@Cuarroc Cuarroc added the review-ok Pipeline: review disposition complete, no open high finding label Oct 8, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6d6612acde

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/PLAN.md
Comment on lines +80 to +83
| DR-07c | P1-Sender-Tests portieren; HTTP-Verhalten gegen aktuellen Repo-Server belegen | bestehende Denkraum-Lane qfytpd nach Root-Zuweisung | #681 gemergt; Basis `85ab286`; unabhängig von 07d/e1/e2 | Server | C bei reinem Testport; Root kann B verlangen | Startvertrag unten, noch kein Branch/Commit/Dispatch | nur sender.test.mjs; gemeldete 214 ALL/12 Tests; ≤ 300 tatsächlich; P1/D2-Mapping, Node/Suite/prepush grün, Root-Abnahme | 55ea21ce |
| DR-07d | P1-Prioritäts-Tests portieren; ergänzt DR-05 | bestehende Denkraum-Lane qfytpd nach Root-Zuweisung | #681 gemergt; Basis `85ab286`; DR-05-Verknüpfung kein neuer Dateivorgänger | Server | C bei reinem Testport; Root kann B verlangen | Startvertrag unten, noch kein Branch/Commit/Dispatch | nur priority.test.mjs; gemeldete 110 ALL/6 Tests; ≤ 300 tatsächlich; P1/D2-Mapping, Node/Suite/prepush grün, Root-Abnahme | 55ea21ce |
| DR-07e1 | P1-Store-Receipt-/Recovery-Tests vollständig portieren | bestehende Denkraum-Lane qfytpd nach Root-Zuweisung | #681 gemergt; Basis `85ab286`; unabhängig von e2 | Server | C bei reinem Testport; Befund neu einstufen | Startvertrag unten, noch kein Branch/Commit/Dispatch | nur store-receipts.test.mjs; gemeldete 169 ALL/10 Tests; ≤ 300 tatsächlich; eingefrorenes P1 1–34 + 35–169, Node/Suite/prepush grün | 55ea21ce |
| DR-07e2 | P1-Store-Antwort-/Migrations-Tests vollständig portieren | bestehende Denkraum-Lane qfytpd nach Root-Zuweisung | #681 gemergt; Basis `85ab286`; unabhängig von e1 | Server | C bei reinem Testport; Befund neu einstufen | Startvertrag unten, noch kein Branch/Commit/Dispatch | nur store-answers-migration.test.mjs; gemeldete 224 ALL/18 Tests; ≤ 300 tatsächlich; eingefrorenes P1 1–34 + 170–359, Child-Source unverändert, Node/Suite/prepush grün | 55ea21ce |

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Verwende für alle vier Ports einen gültigen Status

Die Status-Zelle muss mit einem der acht in PLAN definierten Werte beginnen, aber alle vier neuen Zeilen beginnen mit Startvertrag. parseGoals() klassifiziert DR-07c/d/e1/e2 deshalb reproduzierbar als invalid, sodass HQ-Zählungen nicht erkennen können, ob die Pakete geplant, bereit oder in Arbeit sind. Präfixiere die Angaben beispielsweise mit Geplant:, damit der kanonische PLAN für Abgleich und Dispatch auswertbar bleibt.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L130-L133

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-08T22:21:35.217581Z 6d6612a Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@mergify mergify Bot added the queued label Oct 8, 2026
@mergify
mergify Bot merged commit 76f8e83 into main Oct 8, 2026
17 checks passed
@mergify
mergify Bot deleted the codex/plan-p1tests-20261008 branch October 8, 2026 22:38
@mergify

mergify Bot commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merge Queue Status

This pull request spent 15 minutes 3 seconds in the queue, including 14 minutes 44 seconds running CI.

Required conditions to merge
  • check-success = gates (linux)
  • check-success = gates (windows)
  • check-success = red-first
  • github-review-approved [🛡 GitHub repository ruleset rule main-pr-required-checks]
  • label != do-not-merge
  • any of [🛡 GitHub repository ruleset rule main-pr-required-checks]:
    • check-success = @github-actions/gates (linux)
    • check-neutral = @github-actions/gates (linux)
    • check-skipped = @github-actions/gates (linux)
  • any of [🛡 GitHub repository ruleset rule main-pr-required-checks]:
    • check-success = @github-actions/gates (windows)
    • check-neutral = @github-actions/gates (windows)
    • check-skipped = @github-actions/gates (windows)
  • any of [🛡 GitHub repository ruleset rule main-pr-required-checks]:
    • check-success = @github-actions/red-first
    • check-neutral = @github-actions/red-first
    • check-skipped = @github-actions/red-first
  • any of [🛡 GitHub repository ruleset rule main-pr-required-checks]:
    • check-neutral = @mergify/Mergify Merge Protections
    • check-skipped = @mergify/Mergify Merge Protections
    • check-success = @mergify/Mergify Merge Protections

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

review-ok Pipeline: review disposition complete, no open high finding

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant