Repository navigation
Certify integer-count budgets for three ideal lever combinations (no new kappa) - #3889
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 20, 2026
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 20, 2026
Draft
Draft
Draft
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change and mathematical scope
PR #3874 leaves open whether integer child counts erase the margin of its three minimal target-reaching lever cells. This package answers that arithmetic question: all three still clear its explicit κ-cap target 1/99, tested at the correctly converted moment saving a = 1/98. It prices both an identical integer paid profile per call and a pooled paid profile, with idle counts integral before normalization in 9-call and 144-call pools.
The tightest model has
0.010351600977 < a* < 0.010351600978. Its nine-call uniform paid profile can tolerate 16 additional rank-one children in total; 17 fail. That is an additive recursive-work screen, with no mass credit. Physical realization, legal pooling, restoration, precision, the bit supplier and complete supplier admission remain open. No new κ or selected-frontier change. Integer twins allow ranks at most the named cap, including a remainder; they do not require every child to have exactly that rank.Task and overlap
Task
complex-new-helper-inventory, scope changed by the handoff-first procedure to PR3874's explicit integer-budget question. This is a planning subproblem; it does not satisfy the card's physical-construction gate.Only
research/lever-integer-twins/is added (eight files). The retained PR3874 source is read as data and remains byte-identical. Base20ecf2891d80b5acf18d980b2164fb44ea7faa90, priority revision 6; contribution heada18b03ea76fb373aeb00acc9c4fe119ac617ac83. Canonical claim and handoff.Validation
Validation completed locally on CPython 3.12: registered replay; normal and optimized checks; clean Git-free export; all 12 exact moment brackets; 224 small dynamic-program comparisons; nine malformed-input controls; a separate integer-power checker for all target signs and 24 surcharge-boundary signs, including off-by-one controls. Exact committed-byte and full source-history checks pass. The independent checker does not claim independent root-bracket or physical-realization verification. Hosted CI run 39193371151 passes both plan and registered package replay for this head.
Reproduce:
Credit
Nick Petalas (#3874 grid/open question, #3811 integer cap work, #3754 pooling), Arham Tahir (#3747 aggregation correction), jwr404 (#3757 mass accounting), Penguin/OpenAI for Maximus Putnam (#1685 concavity optimum), Douglas Colkitt/Claude (model/arithmetic), PR1012 and the retained selected supplier lineage. This applies their results to the requested cells; it does not claim them as new. Substantial OpenAI Codex assistance for ToikY; independent human/formal review unclaimed. Apache-2.0.
Entry overlap covered 592 open PR bodies; pre-submission refresh covered 594, including drafts. Live board/thread checks were manual; no complete Discussion cache, and sparse local coverage. No same-cell continuation was found within that coverage. Main and the pinned #3874 head were unchanged. Nothing is merged and no other PR is closed.
Open next questions
See the package's two next questions: derive an actual rank-8/u2 source/consumer contract and charge it against the residual moment budget; characterize legal idle pooling groups from that construction. Both are blocked by the absence of a physical implementation here. Another ideal ceiling alone would not close either obligation.