Repository navigation
Prove the all-pair P104 consumer budget obstruction - #2741
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 16, 2026
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Extends Jose Manuel's four-pair screen to every integer
p>=1, with the actual widthm=16p+9,W=208p,p+1forward calls andpdual calls. Even forgiving 416 rank units per dual, supplying the other 102 corrections free, allowing full-width idle children and adding any finite number of fully paid banks cannot meet the selected saving.Only
research/p104-all-pair-consumer-budget/is added. It contains the scoped proof, exact receipt, source pins, retained predecessor notices, standalone checker, tests and opt-in replay hook. Proof and assumptions. Canonical claim.Credit Jose Manuel/jmbarrancoml for the p=4 calculation and rank-discount argument; ywz65 for #2458/#2712 and the physical-dual lineage; commdata2338 for #2662; Nick Petalas for #2550; Ross Richardson for #2445. Full native-channel, geometry and template credit remains in the package. #2729's local fusion allowance and #2675's monotone-history relaxation concern different questions.
Evidence
E,F,I,UP,Band staged whitespace checks pass.0374b3e6a532dac112813523d605288c416418c1, priority revision 5. Refreshed main7b39515117fe26e75d16c268877391f1bdaa5640has unchanged guidance, selected record, runner and live inputs. Both dependency heads are unchanged. Final overlap covered 751 open PRs and 1,368 Discussion records with complete pagination, followed by targeted thread reads; it is a metadata search, not proof of novelty.Merge Danger
Door: two-way. One isolated research package and bounded opt-in replay.
Blast Radius: research.
The result assumes the explicitly stated one-unpaid-coordinate coverage law and endpoint-progress limit. Changed profiles, call multiplicities, paid-work sharing or consumer coverage are outside it. Native correctness remains inherited; physical hosting, precision/tape, all-size admission and a complete multiplication theorem are not verified. No selected-frontier or kappa change, independent human review, formal-kernel proof or hosted-CI success is claimed.
Next useful work needs a changed complete profile or a justified replacement consumer/coverage law, not another pair count or idle repacking of these exact words.