Skip to content

Research: exact four-call minimum for an infinite-dihedral target - #2186

Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
1337isnot1337:research/cycle-20261014-y
Oct 15, 2026
Merged

Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
1337isnot1337:research/cycle-20261014-y

Conversation

@1337isnot1337

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Result

This package gives an exact, scoped minimum of four paid factors for the fixed two-register target diag([rs],[sr]) in F2[D_infinity], where D_infinity=<r,s | r^2=s^2=1>. Each factor is D_N(g)=I+([g]+[1])N, g in {r,s}, with N any rank-one idempotent in M2(F2).

The full 12-factor alphabet was enumerated through length 3: 1, 12, 144, and 1,728 words (1,885 total), with no target hit. The direct four-call word is checked as a positive control. Thus the exact minimum is four in this formal model; a three-call mechanism would have saved one call (25%). This is a bounded negative result, not a universal lower bound or a selected supplier / κ improvement.

Reproduce

python3 -I -B research/dinf-opposite-translation-two-role-seedc1fb29/verify.py
python3 scripts/research_package.py --package research/dinf-opposite-translation-two-role-seedc1fb29 --check-only

The verifier checks the faithful Z semidirect C2 normal form, independently scans all 16 binary 2x2 matrices for the six rank-one idempotents, checks the four-call construction and wrong-label/dropped-factor controls, and emits per-depth digests and support histograms. Local replay and package metadata/pin check pass under Python 3.14.7. The verifier uses only the standard library.

Pins and overlap

  • Base: 0fdd7d82de03e43c9e5a1000dfbcd380d1b687d2 (canonical main was refreshed before submission and remains at this commit).
  • Selected-record SHA-256: 10b9e340fd8e354a37a0c4813c90e5de1dd42044b5f6aca4a3fc5a42b685fa32.
  • Priority revision 4; seed c1fb29dcb0611f4296d6ffcca54b3d48; task bit-new-register-model; catalogue SHA-256 d46eb6d5b3e279428753d770653663fbdf1063e55c255ea073d768f344927ef7.
  • Discussion Ten-instance independent research session: interface and verifier audits #1884 mentions infinite-dihedral group algebras as a broad future direction. This package fixes a two-register opposite-translation endpoint and exhausts its complete radius-three word ball; it does not assert a general per-reflection bound.

The final open-PR search found no matching D-infinity/opposite-translation PR. A cached complete Discussion snapshot (821 records) found only the broad #1884 note. A fresh full Discussion pagination attempt stalled, so no fresh complete Discussion sweep is claimed; the current coordination thread and #1884 were checked directly before submission.

Scope and attribution

All factors cost one paid call; equality in the full group algebra enforces arbitrary dirty-state behavior. The result covers only this target, these two reflection labels, two registers, and rank-one idempotents over F2. It does not count a physical implementation, recursive child/interface expense, or imply a new κ.

Prepared by Cinna Davis with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance in target selection, exact search implementation, verification controls, and package preparation. No selected frontier or frozen source was changed.

@Mister-Meeseeks
Mister-Meeseeks merged commit a767486 into CrocSwap:main Oct 15, 2026
55 of 61 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants