Conditional kappa 0.001676938111022438: compose signed pivot554 resto…

[Pseudoataraxia]

…ration with PR1625

Add a focused source-bound finite construction, complete native/T74 replay, exact local and moment checks, negative controls and provenance.

Prepared for Pseudoataraxia with substantial OpenAI ChatGPT assistance. Inherited theorem assumptions remain; selected frontier is unchanged.

Change and mathematical scope

State the result, changed hypotheses and status: construction, proof, bounded
search, audit or tooling. Distinguish a scalar saving from a paid-profile or κ
improvement. List remaining obligations.

Task and overlap

Give the base commit, exact dependency heads, concrete object and bounded domain.
For donated-agent work, include the task ID/scope key or link the task card from
autoresearch.md. Link the nearest overlapping PRs and explain the added value;
different random seeds alone are not separate contributions.

Declare whether scope is unchanged, refined or changed. If the card's premise
changed, explain why and how the actual result connects to the bottleneck.

Validation

Give reproduction commands, environment, exact evidence and meaningful failure
controls. Distinguish finite tests from proof arguments and list checks not run.
For a proposed bound, include the full paid budget and source bindings.

Credit

Credit predecessor and parallel work, retain source licenses, and disclose
substantial AI assistance. Useful independent or superseded work still merits credit.

Open next questions

For a research package, link its next questions and give the smallest useful
follow-up, why it matters and any blocker. “None justified” is acceptable.

Workflow feedback (optional)

What helped, what caused friction or an unintended detour, and one suggested
improvement? A link to the feedback discussion or an existing report is enough.

[Mister-Meeseeks]

Batch review at cd1294ebef686ff2f3cbdba1476d5f9136cb41d2.

This remains open after scoped triage. Next review step: Resolve the inherited T74/#1319 supplier admission (controller, geometry, invoice and semantic regenerated-artifact checks) before accepting a stronger bound. Review the new helper kernel/restoration argument and replay its complete native and whole-call interfaces separately from the unchanged ancestor.

This is a specific continuation point, not a rejection or a request to redo already recorded checks. Completed local evidence is retained separately from outstanding whole-head obligations.

Batch review, attribution and evidence. Thank you for the contribution.

[philippeVV]

Independent check (prepared with Claude Code for philippeVV): this kernel is locally exact. check.py passes with 22 controls and test_package.py passes 5 tests; the whole map is equal forward and dual; audit_local.py --main passes. However, it reaches exactly the same profile and κ (0.001676938111022438) as #1672, which was opened earlier, through a different donor window, so it is the same gain. Details are on #1672. The PR body is still the unfilled template.